Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Lipinski’s “rule of five

To become familiar with Lipinski s Rule of Five"... [Pg.597]

In general, the first step in virtual screening is the filtering by the application of Lipinski s Rule of Five [20]. Lipinski s work was based on the results of profiling the calculated physical property data in a set of 2245 compounds chosen from the World Drug Index. Polymers, peptides, quaternary ammonium, and phosphates were removed from this data set. Statistical analysis of this data set showed that approximately 90% of the remaining compounds had ... [Pg.607]

The genesis of in silico oral bioavailability predictions can be traced back to Lip-inski s Rule of Five and others qualitative attempts to describe drug-like molecules [13-15]. These processes are useful primarily as a qualitative tool in the early stage library design and in the candidate selection. Despite its large number of falsepositive results, Lipinski s Rule of Five has come into wide use as a qualitative tool to help the chemist design bioavailable compounds. It was concluded that compounds are most likely to have poor absorption when the molecular weight is >500, the calculated octan-l-ol/water partition coefficient (c log P) is >5, the number of H-bond donors is >5, and the number of H-bond acceptors is >10. Computation of these properties is now available as an ADME (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion) screen in commercial software such as Tsar (from Accelrys). The rule-of-5 should be seen as a qualitative, rather than quantitative, predictor of absorption and permeability [16, 17]. [Pg.450]

Interestingly, the PRCC is relatively free of compounds that violate Lipinski s Rule of Five (ROF) [15] as shown in Table 13.1. Similar ROF behavior has also been observed by Oprea [16] for other compound databases including the ACD and the MDDR (MDL Drug Data Report, MDL Information Systems, San Leandro, CA). [Pg.324]

None of these methods gives a perfect prediction, particularly because H-bonding potential needs to be overlaid over intrinsic lipophilicity. For this reason Lipinski s rule-of-five becomes valuable in defining the outer limits in which chemists can work [9]. Lipinski defined the boundaries of good absorption potential by demonstrating that poor permeability is produced by ... [Pg.41]

The pioneers of bioavailability modeling can be traced back to year 2000. Andrews and coworkers [57] developed a regression model to predict bioavailability for 591 compounds. Compared to the Lipinski s "Rule of Five," the false negative predictions were reduced from 5% to 3%, while the false positive predictions decreased from 78% to 53%. The model could achieve a relatively good correlation (r2 = 0.71) for the training set. But when 80/20 cross-validation was applied, the correlation was decreased to q1 — 0.58. [Pg.114]

The optimization of physicochemical properties can be dealt with by applying simple thresholds such as Lipinski s rule-of-five (19). The rule states that if a compound violates any two of the following rules it is predicted to have poor oral absorption ... [Pg.340]

This has been shown to work well for a diverse set of libraries (see Note 2) (4). In Fig. 17.3, the offset is calculated for the oxazolidine library for properties related to Lipinski s rule of five (8) the number of hydrogen bond acceptors (HBA), the number of hydrogen bond donors (HBD), the number of non-hydrogen atoms (NHA), and the calculated log P (9). [Pg.340]

They found that with regard to absorption, which is primarily passive in fish, compounds that are ionized are less likely to be taken up than neutral compounds, and that increased bioavailability was a function of molecular weight (<500), logPe/w (<5), H-bond acceptors (<4—5), and H-bond donors (<7-10) based on drug design from Lipinski s rule of five [57, 58]. de Wolf et al. [59] recommended that compounds with a molecular length of >4.3 nm indicates no uptake or bioconcen-... [Pg.417]

Lipinski s Rule of Five for Orally Active Drugs... [Pg.32]

It is not always clear if any of the new scaffolds are significantly superior to nature s peptides or nucleotides. Just like the latter, all oligomers inherently suffer from the disadvantage of increasingly likely violation of Lipinski s Rule of Five or other descriptors of drug-like properties as the number of residues in the sequence... [Pg.96]


See other pages where Lipinski’s “rule of five is mentioned: [Pg.617]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.428]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.482]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.476]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.344]    [Pg.473]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.337]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.33 , Pg.443 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.30 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.2195 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.6 , Pg.42 , Pg.452 ]




SEARCH



Lipinski

Lipinski rule

Lipinski rule of five

Lipinski’s rule

Rule of five

S , five

© 2024 chempedia.info