Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Linear expansion coefficients, determination

The eigenvalues of this mabix have the form of Eq. (68), but this time the matrix elements are given by Eqs. (84) and (85). The symmetry arguments used to determine which nuclear modes couple the states, Eq. (81), now play a cracial role in the model. Thus the linear expansion coefficients are only nonzero if the products of symmebies of the electronic states at Qq and the relevant nuclear mode contain the totally symmebic inep. As a result, on-diagonal matrix elements are only nonzero for totally symmebic nuclear coordinates and, if the elecbonic states have different symmeby, the off-diagonal elements will only... [Pg.285]

This is perhaps the easiest method to understand. It is based on the variational principle (Appendix B), analogous to the HF method. The trial wave function is written as a linear combination of determinants with the expansion coefficients determined by requiring that the energy should be a minimum (or at least stationary), a procedure known as Configuration Interaction (Cl). The MOs used for building the excited Slater determinants are taken from a Hartree-Fock calculation and held fixed. Subscripts S, D, T etc. indicate determinants which are singly, doubly, triply etc. excited relative to the... [Pg.101]

The linear expansion coefficient a (= 1/2 and J/2 are the radii of gyration in the perturbed and unperturbed state, respectively) is determined from the penetration function F which is defined by 64)... [Pg.29]

Fig. 22. Linear expansion coefficient as of cellulose acetate (CA)-solvent systems plotted as a function of Mw 7). The lines are determined by the least-square method. Numbers on the lines denote the total degree of substitution F of CA. O CA(0.49)-DMAc CA(i.75)-DMAc A CA(2.46)-DMAc A CA(2.46)-acetone jL CA(2.46)-THF CA(2.92)-DMAc... Fig. 22. Linear expansion coefficient as of cellulose acetate (CA)-solvent systems plotted as a function of Mw 7). The lines are determined by the least-square method. Numbers on the lines denote the total degree of substitution F of CA. O CA(0.49)-DMAc CA(i.75)-DMAc A CA(2.46)-DMAc A CA(2.46)-acetone jL CA(2.46)-THF CA(2.92)-DMAc...
Using the calculated m, the integers km for the appropriate cos and sin forms to be used in the linear expansion are determined next. Since the Zj displacements can be expressed either in terms of q, pm and m, or as the linear sum a (1)+6m (cosm)+(sinm), the coefficients have been shown [208] to follow as... [Pg.223]

The linear thermal expansion coefficient determination of filled polyketone systems... [Pg.77]

A pair of relationships which are useful in manipulating the quantities involved in the use of the discrete variational method when used in conjunction with a basis-expansion approach. Any function which is a linear expansion of the basis functions and for which we have a physical space representation evaluated at our choice of coordinates may have its expansion coefficients determined by multiplication by the inverse of... [Pg.375]

The coefficient of thermal expansion can be determined in two different ways. The first, and most direct, is simply to take a single crystal of ice and measure its dimensions as a function of temperature. From the symmetry of the crystal the results can be expressed in terms of two linear expansion coefficients a = l dljdT) in directions parallel to the r-axis and to an a-axis respectively. Alternatively X-ray diffraction methods can be used to measure the c and a dimensions of the unit cell as a function of temperature. These two methods do not, in fact, measure exactly the same thing, since in a real crystal there will be an equilibrium concentration of vacancies and interstitial molecules, and these concentrations will change with temperature. As we shall see, however, the experimental results for ice are not sufficiently accurate to enable a meaningful distinction to be drawn. [Pg.130]

Kimmel and Andrews [195] have summarized measurements of the PAN Tg, up to the year 1965. The values fall into two ranges. For static measurements, distinct changes in the temperature dependence of the measured property are observed around 85 95°C. Higher values of Tg, 105 140°C, are obtained using dynamic mechanical and dielectric measurements, Tg values of 85 and 87°C, based on the linear expansion coefficient, were reported by Bohn et al. [120] and Howard [196]. Howard determined the Tg for a series of (AN-VA) copolymers by measuring the linear expansion coefficient of copolymer discs. The Tg for the PAN homopolymer was determined to be 87°C. Upon incorporation of VA, the value of Tg... [Pg.861]

On the other hand, the linear combination of atomic orbitals - molecular orbital (LCAO-MO) theory, is actually the same as Hartree-Fock theory. The basic idea of this theory is that a molecular orbital is made of a linear combination of atom-centered basis functions describing the atomic orbitals. The Hartree-Fock procedure simply determines the linear expansion coefficients of the linear combination. The variables in the Hartree-Fock equations are recursively defined, that is, they depend on themselves, so the equations are solved by an iterative procedure. In typical cases, the Hartree-Fock solutions can be obtained in roughly 10 iterations. For tricky cases, convergence may be improved by changing the form of the initial guess. Since the equations are solved self-consistently, Hartree-Fock is an example of a self-consistent field (SCF) method. [Pg.40]

AN APPARATUS FOR DETERMINATION OF LINEAR EXPANSION COEFFICIENT OF PLASTICS. [Pg.161]

A second model with segmental diffusion as the rate-determining step has been introduced by Mahabadi and O Driscoll [100]. Although it shows great similarity to the model of Horie, Mita and Kambe [111], it has some specific and improved features (i) it predicts the termination rate coefficient for all possible i-j combinations (instead of only i-i) and (ii) it also includes a physically more correct relation for the linear expansion coefficient Mahabadi and O Driscoll [100], have pointed out that the correlation that Horie et al. used to descibe a was inconsistent with literature data. [Pg.42]

Given the product ansatz for the coupled-cluster wave function (13.1.7), let us consider its optimization. We recall that, in Cl theory, the wave function (13.1.8) is determined by minimizing the expectation value of the Hamiltonian with respect to the linear expansion coefficients ... [Pg.129]

In Chapters 6 and 7 we have encountered two types of optimization problem (i) that which arises when we vary the orbitals in a wavefunc-tion of 1-determinant form and (ii) that which results when we vary the linear expansion coefficients in a wavefimction of many-determinant or Cl form such as (7.2.3). Optimization of the wavefunction with respect to linear parameters is a simple matter, depending only on solution of a large set of linear equations. But the optimization of even a relatively simple wavefunction with respect to orbital variations raises more difficult problems, typical of non-linear variation methods, as we have seen in both chapters. [Pg.255]

The use of -Ga20s wafers for heteroepitaxial purposes depends on lattice mismatch, thermal expansion coefficient and electrical properties. The first issue is discussed in detail in section 2.2 for the case of GaN epitaxy. The linear expansion coefficients have been determined hrom the measurements shown in Fig. 4 (right). The coefficients along the b- and o-axes are the same, with a value of 5.9 x 10 K. The homogeneous in>plane expansion of the a-plane contrasts with the about three times smalW mq>ansk>n coeffident along the o-axis (1.9 X 10- K-i). [Pg.80]

Equation (2.18) is a linear variation function. (The summation indices prevent double-counting of excited configurations.) The expansion coefficients cq, c, c%, and so on are varied to minimize the variational integral. o) is a better approximation than l o)- In principle, if the basis were complete. Cl would provide an exact solution. Here we use a truncated expansion retaining only determinants D that differ from I Tq) by at most two spin orbitals this is a singly-doubly excited Cl (SDCI). [Pg.13]

However, due to the normalization constraint, there is one linear dependancy in the expansion coefficients. If we simply solve equation 78 for the coefficients, they may no longer be normalized, and if we solve for N — 1 of the coefficients and invoke the normalization condition to determine the Nth, the energy may not be stationary about it. So we construct the function... [Pg.14]


See other pages where Linear expansion coefficients, determination is mentioned: [Pg.122]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.1041]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.2338]    [Pg.612]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.430]    [Pg.538]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.459]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.27 ]




SEARCH



Determination, coefficient

Expansivity linear

Linear coefficients

Linear expansion coefficient

© 2024 chempedia.info