Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Linear back prediction

Back propagation network (single) Linear projection Fixed shape, sigmoid [a, 0], minimum output prediction error... [Pg.34]

In most cases, the sample titer curves followed the predicted titer standard curve based upon known concentration ratios. Observed variations in linearity were traced back to inconsistencies in labeling rather than cross-reactivity or sample preparation issues such as pipetting or mixing errors. Overall, antigen arrays performed better than antibody arrays. While the exact reasons for the... [Pg.203]

Let us now come back to the issue of linearity of the isotherm and dependency of Kld on the sorbate concentration. In numerous field studies in which both particle-associated and dissolved concentrations of PAHs are measured, apparent Kioc values are up to two orders of magnitude higher than one would have predicted from a simple absorption model (Gustafsson and Gschwend, 1999). If a natural soil or sediment matrix includes impenetrable hydrophobic solids on which the chemical of interest may absorb, the overall Kioc value must reflect both absorption into recent natural organic matter and absorption onto these surfaces. [Pg.304]

Back-transformed to the corresponding %abs scale, this model is still slightly more accurate than the model derived by Zhao et al., which is based on Abraham s linear free solvation parameters. By its construction, our model avoids the prediction of negative %abs-values or those greater than 100, which can easily occur in most other methods (see Fig. 11.4). [Pg.177]

In bioanalysis, extracted samples are usually stored in either autosampler vials or wells in a plate (such as 96-well plate) sealed with pierceable caps or covers. During injection, the autosampler needle has to pierce the caps or covers to load samples. The debris may completely or partially block the autosampler needle, which would result in no sample or variably low sample volumes injected. Accordingly, no or randomly low IS responses are observed. As most autosamplers have a built-in needle flushing mechanism, the debris in the needle might be flushed out later partially or completely. Therefore, the injected volume can be back to normal at a later time without an operator s intervention. Apparently, when a needle will be blocked and when the blocked needle will be cleared by flushing, as well as how it will be blocked (completely or partially) are difficult to predict. Hence, there would be no clear pattern for this type of IS variations. However, the affected injections normally have lowered IS responses (Fig. 9). Despite lowered IS responses, the accuracy of quantitation can usually be maintained except for situations where no or very low amount of samples are injected, resulting in responses outside the limit of linear range or unacceptable S/N. [Pg.17]

It was evident in the earliest profiles obtained for dissolved °Th that this prediction does not hold, in that concentrations of dissolved °Th were observed to increase with depth in a nearly linear fashion (Bacon and Anderson, 1982 Nozaki et al., 1981). These results were interpreted to indicate that sorption processes are a reversible reaction in which particulate thorium may be released back into solution, as represented by k-i in Figure 1 (Bacon and Anderson, 1982 Nozaki et al., 1981). Neglecting advection and diffusion, mass balance equations for dissolved and particulate thorium can be written, respectively, as... [Pg.3101]

The shear stress o and the normal stress differences Ny and N2 are all predicted to be linear in the shear rate y. This scaling has indeed been observed for LCPs in Region II (Kiss and Porter 1980b Moldenaers and Mewis 1986 Back et al. 1993b). In contrast, for isotropic polymeric materials, is proportional to y at low shear rates. As noted earlier, if s is identically zero, then there are no domain interactions, and hence the stresses never reach a steady state. However, in the singular limit that approaches zero without reaching it, from Eq. (11-35) we find that a /r -f iiikll and N N2 0 hence only a is nonzero as this limit is approached. [Pg.542]


See other pages where Linear back prediction is mentioned: [Pg.75]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.482]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.482]    [Pg.491]    [Pg.497]    [Pg.789]    [Pg.425]    [Pg.393]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.449]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.310]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.477]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.1030]    [Pg.478]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.613]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.375]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.700]    [Pg.327]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.129 ]




SEARCH



Linear prediction

© 2024 chempedia.info