Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Lattice model mean-field

Correlation between liquid behavior at thermodynamic equilibrium and that during flow follows from the mean-field approach, which assumes that liquids are structureless and that the dynamic behavior can be considered a semiequilibrium state. Evidently, this approach is unable to explain kinetic phenomena. The S-S lattice-hole mean-field theory does not consider polymeric chain structure, but its effects are reflected in the values of the characteristic reducing parameters, P, T, V, and tlie L-J interaction parameters. Characteristically, the PVT data rarely show secondary transformation temperatures at about 0.8r and 1.2r, which are evident in derivative properties (see Figures 6.1 and 6.2). By contrast, all flow models (e.g., reptation, cell structures, hole jumping) implicitly postulate that such configurational or conformational changes affect liquid dynamic behavior. [Pg.259]

The thermodynamics of self-assembly has been widely investigated using simple phenomenological models, mean field-based lattice models, and more sophisticated self-consistent field theory... [Pg.187]

Coleman ST, McKinnon WR, Dahn JR (1984) Lihtium intercalation in LixMogSeg a model mean-field lattice gas. Phys Rev B 29 4147 149... [Pg.545]

Lattice models have been studied in mean field approximation, by transfer matrix methods and Monte Carlo simulations. Much interest has focused on the occurrence of a microemulsion. Its location in the phase diagram between the oil-rich and the water-rich phases, its structure and its wetting properties have been explored [76]. Lattice models reproduce the reduction of the surface tension upon adsorption of the amphiphiles and the progression of phase equilibria upon increasmg the amphiphile concentration. Spatially periodic (lamellar) phases are also describable by lattice models. Flowever, the structure of the lattice can interfere with the properties of the periodic structures. [Pg.2380]

A number of theoretical models have been proposed to describe the phase behavior of polymer—supercritical fluid systems, eg, the SAET and LEHB equations of state, and mean-field lattice gas models (67—69). Many examples of polymer—supercritical fluid systems are discussed ia the Hterature (1,3). [Pg.225]

To illustrate the complexity of the phase behavior in a more compact way it is instructive to employ a mean-field lattice-gas model. The relative simplicity of the grand potential... [Pg.63]

Recently, Vigil and Willmore [67] have reported mean field and lattice gas studies of the oscillatory dynamics of a variant of the ZGB model. In this example oscillations are also introduced, allowing the reversible adsorption of inert species. Furthermore, Sander and Ghaisas [69] have very recently reported simulations for the oxidation of CO on Pt in the presence of two forms of oxygen, namely chemisorbed atomic O and oxidized metal surface. These species, which are expected to be present for reaction under atmospheric pressure, are relevant for the onset of oscillatory behavior [69]. [Pg.406]

FIG. 13 Phase diagram of a vector lattice model for a balanced ternary amphiphilic system in the temperature vs surfactant concentration plane. W -I- O denotes a region of coexistence between oil- and water-rich phases, D a disordered phase, Lj an ordered phase which consists of alternating oil, amphiphile, water, and again amphi-phile sheets, and L/r an incommensurate lamellar phase (not present in mean field calculations). The data points are based on simulations at various system sizes on an fee lattice. (From Matsen and Sullivan [182]. Copyright 1994 APS.)... [Pg.661]

The LST is a finitely parameterized model of the action of a given CA rule, >, on probability measures on the space of configurations on an arbitrary lattice. In a very simple manner - which may be thought of as a generalization of the simple mean field theory (MFT) introduced in section 3.1.3. - the LST provides a sequence of approximations of the statistical features of evolving CA patterns. [Pg.247]

The simplest treatment of the lattice-gas model is through the mean-field or randommixing approximation, which is treated in a number of textbooks (see, e.g.. Refs. 1 and 4). We give a short summary of its application to liquid-liquid interfaces, since it nicely illustrates under what conditions the phases separate. [Pg.166]

The lattice gas model of Bell et al. [33] neither gave any detailed mechanism of the orientational ordering nor separated the contributions of the headgroup and the acyl chain. Lavis et al. [34] discussed Ref. 33 critically and concluded that the sharp kink point in the isotherm at transition was an artifact of the mean field approximation used. An improved correspondence to experimental data was claimed by the use of the real-space renormalization group method [35]. The same authors returned to the problem [35] and concluded that in addition to the orientation of the molecules, chain melting had to be included in a model which could interpret the phase transitions. [Pg.539]

Prausnitz and coworkers [91,92] developed a model which accounts for nonideal entropic effects by deriving a partition function based on a lattice model with three categories of interaction sites hydrogen bond donors, hydrogen bond acceptors, and dispersion force contact sites. A different approach was taken by Marchetti et al. [93,94] and others [95-98], who developed a mean field theory... [Pg.512]

The quality of the mean-field approximation can be tested in simulations of the same lattice model [13]. Ideally, direct free-energy calculations of the liquid and solid phases would allow us to locate the point where the two phases coexist. However, in the present studies we followed a less accurate, but simpler approach we observed the onset of freezing in a simulation where the system was slowly cooled. To diminish the effect of supercooling at the freezing point, we introduced a terraced substrate into the system to act as a crystallization seed [14]. We verified that this seed had little effect on the phase coexistence temperature. For details, see Sect. A.3. At freezing, we have... [Pg.9]

Figure 3a shows the mean-field predictions for the polymer phase diagram for a range of values for Ep/Ec and B/Ec. The corresponding simulation results are shown in Fig. 3b. As can be seen from the figure, the mean-field theory captures the essential features of the polymer phase diagram and provides even fair quantitative agreement with the numerical results. A qualitative flaw of the mean-field model is that it fails to reproduce the crossing of the melting curves at 0 = 0.73. It is likely that this discrepancy is due to the neglect of the concentration dependence of XeS Improved estimates for Xeff at high densities can be obtained from series expansions based on the lattice-cluster theory [68,69]. Figure 3a shows the mean-field predictions for the polymer phase diagram for a range of values for Ep/Ec and B/Ec. The corresponding simulation results are shown in Fig. 3b. As can be seen from the figure, the mean-field theory captures the essential features of the polymer phase diagram and provides even fair quantitative agreement with the numerical results. A qualitative flaw of the mean-field model is that it fails to reproduce the crossing of the melting curves at 0 = 0.73. It is likely that this discrepancy is due to the neglect of the concentration dependence of XeS Improved estimates for Xeff at high densities can be obtained from series expansions based on the lattice-cluster theory [68,69].
In order to understand the thermodynamic issues associated with the nanocomposite formation, Vaia et al. have applied the mean-field statistical lattice model and found that conclusions based on the mean field theory agreed nicely with the experimental results [12,13]. The entropy loss associated with confinement of a polymer melt is not prohibited to nanocomposite formation because an entropy gain associated with the layer separation balances the entropy loss of polymer intercalation, resulting in a net entropy change near to zero. Thus, from the theoretical model, the outcome of nanocomposite formation via polymer melt intercalation depends on energetic factors, which may be determined from the surface energies of the polymer and OMLF. [Pg.272]

Certain difficulties remain, however, with this approach. First, such an important feature as a secondary structure did not find its place in this theory. Second, the techniques of sequence design ensuring exact reproduction of the given conformation are well developed only for lattice models of polymers. The existing techniques for continuum models are complex, intricate, and inefficient. Yet another aspect of the problem is the necessity of reaching in some cases beyond the mean field approximation. The first steps in this direction were made in paper [84], where an analog of the Ginzburg number for the theory of heteropolymers was established. [Pg.212]

Although the simple mean-field expression (Eqn (7.10)) for a lattice-gas model has been used to understand intercalation systems qualitatively... [Pg.181]

Simulations [73] have recently provided some insights into the formal 5c —> 0 limit predicted by mean field lattice model theories of glass formation. While Monte Carlo estimates of x for a Flory-Huggins (FH) lattice model of a semifiexible polymer melt extrapolate to infinity near the ideal glass transition temperature Tq, where 5c extrapolates to zero, the values of 5c computed from GD theory are too low by roughly a constant compared to the simulation estimates, and this constant shift is suggested to be sufficient to prevent 5c from strictly vanishing [73, 74]. Hence, we can reasonably infer that 5 approaches a small, but nonzero asymptotic low temperature limit and that 5c similarly becomes critically small near Tq. The possibility of a constant... [Pg.138]


See other pages where Lattice model mean-field is mentioned: [Pg.2307]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.705]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.5008]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.534]    [Pg.550]    [Pg.2363]    [Pg.2367]    [Pg.2368]    [Pg.2371]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.668]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.673]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.541]    [Pg.512]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.141]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.115 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.115 ]




SEARCH



Field modeling

Lattice Field Model

Lattice models

Mean model

Mean-field

Mean-field models

© 2024 chempedia.info