Lapse rate moist

Figure 2. Schematic vertical profiles (a) h (dashed) and h (solid) and (b) q (dashed) and q (solid), (c) The temperature profile, corresponding to cpT = h — gZ — Lyq, illustrates die constant lapse rate within the boundary layer and the reduced lapse rate above the boundary layer. The boundary level (1 km) is indicated by die horizontal dashed line in each panel. These profiles illustrate typical climatic values that are determined by moist convective adjustment in the free atmosphere and dry adiabatic convection in the boundary layer. [Used by permission of Geological Society of America, from Forest et al. (1999), Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., Vol. Ill, Fig. 2, p. 500.]...

C02 assimilation. The amount of C02 available for photosynthesis decreases with decreasing C02 partial pressure at higher elevations, but this effect is offset by the increase in diffusion speed at lower air pressure (Gale 1972, 1973). The lower temperature at higher altitudes, however, decreases diffusion speed, and therefore the temperature lapse rate of the particular mountain determines whether C02 availability decreases (dry-moist lapse rate) or stays relatively constant (very wet lapse rate) (Smith and Donahue 1991). The lower air pressure at altitude does not just decrease C02 partial pressure but also 02 partial pressure, which results in lower photorespiration rates and more efficient photosynthesis. When all these effects are modeled, photosynthetic rates generally decrease with altitude, unless the temperature lapse rate is very low (which could occur in extremely wet mountain ranges), but the photosynthetic limitation is much less than expected based on just the partial pressure decrease (Terashima et al. 1995 Smith and lohnson 2007). 

The term mw/m is equal to the mass mixing ratio of water in the air parcel, wv. Dividing this expression by dz and once more using (1.3), we find the expression for the moist adiabatic lapse rate ... 

Moist Adiabatic Lapse Rate Calculation Calculate the moist adiabatic lapse rate at 0°C and 1 atm. An expression for the water vapor saturation vapor pressure as a function of temperature is given in Table 17.2. 

Our previous discussion focused on a rising air parcel. The same conclusions are applicable to a sinking air parcel. If A > T, then the atmosphere enhances its motion, whereas if A < T, the atmosphere suppresses it. Finally, if the air parcel is saturated with water vapor, one would need to use the moist adiabatic lapse rate Ts instead of T in the discussion above. 

If the environmental lapse rate lies between the dry and moist values, then the stability of the atmosphere depends on whether the rising air is saturated. When an air parcel is not saturated, then the dry adiabatic lapse rate is the relevant reference state and the atmosphere is stable. For a saturated air parcel inside a cloud, the moist adiabatic rate is the applicable criterion for comparison and the atmosphere is unstable. Therefore a cloudy atmosphere is inherently less stable than the corresponding dry atmosphere with the same lapse rate. 

In meteorology, it is experienced that the dry adiabatic rate is -1 °C per 100 m change in altitude. In reality, the atmosphere laps rate can reduce from -0.6 to -0.7 °C per 100 m. The moist adiabatic rate is around -0.6 °C per 100 m of change in altitude. When the water condenses out as it rises, it adds latent heat due to evaporation. This is why its lapse rate is below that of dry air. ... 

If a parcel of air being lifted dry adiabatically achieves a relative humidity of 100% (i.e., becomes saturated), water vapor condenses to form a cloud, and latent heat of condensation is released. (This discussion does not consider the latent heat that can be released when ice is present.) Thus, the parcel now cools at a rate less than dry adiabatic, the rate depending on whether all or part of the condensate stays within the parcel. If all of it remains, the first law of thermodynamics can again be used to derive the moist adiabatic lapse rate. The resulting lapse rate is not constant as is the diy adiabatic lapse rate, bnt is dependent on pressnre and temperature. For 1000 kPa and 20°C, this lapse rate is 4°C km , while at the same pressnre and a temperatnre of 0°C, it increases to 6°C km. At temperatnres below abont —30°C, the moist adiabatic lapse rate approximates the diy adiabatic rate. 

Numerous in-cloud measxnements, along with theoretical and laboratory studies, have indicated that entrainment takes place that is, air in the environment surroimding a parcel of air is mixed into the parcel and becomes part of the rising current. A rising parcel of cloudy air into which dry air is entrained cools at a faster rate than moist adiabatic, because heat is required (1) to evaporate sufficient condensate, increasing the mixing ratio of the air to saturation, and (2) to warm the air from its original temperature to the parcel temperature. The lapse rate in an entrained parcel of air falls somewhere between the moist and dry adiabatic rates. 

The parametrization of cumulus cloud rainfall utilizes some form of one-dimensional cloud model. These are called cumulus cloud parametrization schemes. Then-complexity ranges from instantaneous readjustments of the temperature and moisture profile to the moist adiabatic lapse rates when the relative humidity exceeds saturation, to representations of a set of one-dimensional cumulus clouds with a spectra of radii. These parametrizations typically focus on deep cumulus clouds, which produce the majority of rainfall and diabatic heating associated with the phase changes of water. Cumulus cloud parametrizations remain one of the major uncertainties in mesoscale models since they usually have a number of tunable coefficients, which are used to obtain the best agreement with observations. Also, since mesoscale-model resolution is close to the scale of thunderstorms, care must be taken so that the cumulus parametrization and the resolved moist thermodynamics in the model do not double count this component of the and Sq.. 

FIGURE 4 Examples of absolutely stable, conditionally unstable, and absolutely unstable environmental lapse rates (solid lines) relative to the dry and moist adiabatic process lapse rates (dashed lines) experienced by parcels of air displaced vertically from point A. Parcels follow the dry (DD) and moist (MM) adiabatic process curves. 

When the parcel of air originally located at point A in Fig. 4 is displaced upward along either curves DD or MM (representing dry and moist adiabatic processes, respectively), the air becomes increasingly colder than the surrounding temperatures indicated by the SS curve. By virtue of its negative buoyancy, the parcel descends back to equilibrium point A. When the parcel is displaced downward, it becomes increasingly warmer than profile SS and positive buoyancy returns it to point A. Environmental lapse rate SS is said to be absolutely stable because a parcel of air displaced either dry or moist adiabatically returns to its equilibrium level. 

Now consider temperature profile UU. When an air parcel at point A is displaced adiabatically upward (downward) along DD or MM, it becomes increasingly warmer (colder) than the environment and continues to rise (sink). Thus environmental lapse rate UU is said to be absolutely unstable because a parcel of air continues to ascend or descend once it has been displaced either moist or dry adiabatically from its equilibrium level. 

It is possible for an environmental lapse rate to be both stable and unstable, depending on whether or not the air parcel is saturated. Profile CC is said to be conditionally unstable because it is stable for dry adiabatic processes but unstable for moist adiabatic processes. 

Wet adiabatic lapse rates can be determined from Fig. 4.7, which is a skew T-log P diagram, or adiabatic chart. Qn this chart, dry adiabats are lines having a nearly constant slope of 9.8 °C/1000 m (5.4 °F/1000 ft). The wet adiabats (also called moist or saturated adiabats) are curved and have slopes that not only vary with the temperature at which the adiabat originates but also change along the length of the adiabats. Note that the wet adiabats tend to approach the slope of the dry adiabats at low temperatures, at which the absolute amoimt of moisture in saturated air is small (see Table 4.3). 

---