Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Langevin equation statistics

Kramers solution of the barrier crossing problem [45] is discussed at length in chapter A3.8 dealing with condensed-phase reaction dynamics. As the starting point to derive its simplest version one may use the Langevin equation, a stochastic differential equation for the time evolution of a slow variable, the reaction coordinate r, subject to a rapidly statistically fluctuating force F caused by microscopic solute-solvent interactions under the influence of an external force field generated by the PES F for the reaction... [Pg.848]

In order to proceed now to a statistical mechanical description of the corresponding relaxation process, it is convenient to solve the equation of motion for the creation and destruction operators and cast them in a form ressembling a Generalized Langevin equation. We will only sketch the procedure. [Pg.306]

The set of equations (50) can be formally considered as generalized Langevin equations if the operator Fj(t) can be interpreted as a stochastic quantity in the statistical mechanical sense. If the memory function does not correlate different solute modes, namely, if Kjj =Sjj Kj, then a Langevin-type equation follows for each mode ... [Pg.307]

The interpretation of the Langevin equation presents conceptual difficulties that are not present in the Ito and Stratonovich interpretation. These difficulties are the result of the fact that the probability distribution for the random force rip(f) cannot be fully specihed a priori when the diffusivity and friction tensors are functions of the system coordinates. The resulting dependence of the statistical properties of the random forces on the system s trajectories is not present in the Ito and Stratonovich interpretations, in which the randomness is generated by standard Wiener processes Wm(f) whose complete probability distribution is known a priori. [Pg.131]

In either interpretation of the Langevin equation, the form of the required pseudoforce depends on the values of the mixed components of Zpy, and thus on the statistical properties of the hard components of the random forces. The definition of a pseudoforce given here is a generalization of the metric force found by both Fixman [9] and Hinch [10]. An apparent discrepancy between the results of Fixman, who considered the case of unprojected random forces, and those of Hinch, who was able to reproducd Fixman s expression for the pseudoforce only in the case of projected random forces, is traced here to an error in Fixman s use of differential geometry. [Pg.151]

In the traditional interpretation of the Fangevin equation for a constrained system, the overall drift velocity is insensitive to the presence or absence of hard components of the random forces, since these components are instantaneously canceled in the underlying ODF by constraint forces. This insensitivity to the presence of hard forces is obtained, however, only if both the projected divergence of the mobility and the force bias are retained in the expression for the drift velocity. The drift velocity for a kinetic interpretation of a constrained Langevin equation does not contain a force bias, and does depend on statistical properties of the hard random force components. Both Fixman and Hinch nominally considered the traditional interpretation of the Langevin equation for the Cartesian bead coordinates as a limit of an ordinary differential equation. Both authors, however, neglected the possible existence of a bias in the Cartesian random forces. As a result, both obtained a drift velocity that (after correcting the error in Fixman s expression for the pseudoforce) is actually the appropriate expression for a kinetic interpretation. [Pg.151]

This is the Langevin equation [271, 490]. The fluctuating force, f, varies so rapidly that it cannot be described as a function of time directly. Instead, only certain statistical properties can be defined. [Pg.327]

The plan of the article is as follows. First, we discuss the phenomenon of hydrodynamic interaction in general terms, and at the same time, we present some convenient notation. Then, we give the usual argument leading to the Fokker-Planck equation. After that we derive the Langevin equation that is formally equivalent to the Fokker-Planck equation, together with a statistical description of the fluctuating force. [Pg.326]

In another paper, R. Kuho (Kcio University, Japan) illustrates in a rather technical and mathematical fashion tire relationship between Brownian motion and non-equilibrium statistical mechanics, in this paper, the author describes the linear response theory, Einstein s theory of Brownian motion, course-graining and stochastization, and the Langevin equations and their generalizations. [Pg.260]

This section consists of two major parts. The first part (sections B through G) is a review of the statistical description of the Markov processes and of the Langevin equation. The topics considered here are the fundamental definitions and properties that play a central role in the understanding of the theoretical models used to describe unimolecular reactions. Section... [Pg.77]

This section is organized as follows in subsection A the approaches based on the assumption of heat bath statistical equilibrium and those which use the generalized Langevin equation are reviewed for the case of a bounded one-dimensional Brownian particle. A detailed analysis of the activation dynamics in both schemes is carried out by adopting AEP and CFP techniques. In subsection B we shall consider a case where the non-Markovian eharacter of the variable velocity stems from the finite duration of the coherence time of the light used to activate the chemical reaction process itself. [Pg.411]

We are interested in the case s -C 1 because if s is large, then the dynamics tends to become more and more irregular and eventually well-approximated by stochastic dynamics (such as the Langevin equation) and a statistical description will be valid. [Pg.425]

However, neither of these models is adequate for describing multiffactal statistical processes as they stand. A number of investigators have recently developed multifractal random walk models to account for the multiffactal character of various physiological phenomena, and here we introduce a variant of those discussions based on the fractional calculus. The most recent generalization of the Langevin equation incorporates memory into the system s dynamics and has the simple form of Eq. (131) with the dissipation parameter set to zero ... [Pg.66]

Thus, we observe that when the memory kernel in the fractional Langevin equation is random, the solution consists of the product of two random quantities giving rise to a multifractal process. This is Feller s subordination process. We apply this approach to the SRV time series data discussed in Section II and observe, for the statistics of the multiplicative exponent given by Levy statistics, the singularity spectrum as a function of the positive moments... [Pg.68]


See other pages where Langevin equation statistics is mentioned: [Pg.90]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.585]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.412]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.365]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.84]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.76 , Pg.77 , Pg.78 , Pg.79 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.76 , Pg.77 , Pg.78 , Pg.79 ]




SEARCH



Equation Langevine

Langevin

Langevin equation

Langevin statistics

Statistical equations

© 2024 chempedia.info