Itinerant oscillator theory

Both vibrational and rotovibrational relaxation can be described analyti-caDy as multiplicative stochastic processes. For these processes, RMT is equivalent to the stochastic Liouville equation of Kubo, with the added feature that RMT takes into account the back-reaction from the molecule imder consideration on the thermal bath. The stochastic Liouville equation has been used successfully to describe decoupling in the transient field-on condition and the effect of preparation on decay. When dealing with liquid-state molecular dynamics, RMT provides a rigorous justification for itinerant oscillator theory, widely applied to experimental data by Evans and coworkers. This implies analytically that decoupling effects should be exhibited in molecular liquids treated with strong fields. In the absence of experimental data, the computer runs described earlier amount to an independent means of verifying Grigolini s predictions. In this context note that the simulation of Oxtoby and coworkers are semistochastic and serve a similar purpose. 

This experimental result has to be compared with the prediction of the model of (5.69). This model can be studied by using the CFP. The results of ref. 14 are illustrated by Figs. 19 and 20. This figures show that the qualitative agreement between the theory based on the nonlinear itinerant oscillator of Eq. (5.69) and the experiment of Fig. 18 is indeed satisfactory. 

The theory of the Brownian motion on which the itinerant oscillator model is based is distinguished by a characteristic feature, namely, the concept of a collision rate which is the inverse of the time interval between successive collision events of the Brownian particle with its surroundings. In the words of Einstein [71] ... 

In the Introduction the problem of construction of a theoretical model of the metal surface was briefly discussed. If a model that would permit the theoretical description of the chemisorption complex is to be constructed, one must decide which type of the theoretical description of the metal should be used. Two basic approaches exist in the theory of transition metals (48). The first one is based on the assumption that the d-elec-trons are localized either on atoms or in bonds (which is particularly attractive for the discussion of the surface problems). The other is the itinerant approach, based on the collective model of metals (which was particularly successful in explaining the bulk properties of metals). The choice between these two is not easy. Even in contemporary solid state literature the possibility of d-electron localization is still being discussed (49-51). Examples can be found in the literature that discuss the following problems high cohesion energy of transition metals (52), their crystallographic structure (53), magnetic moments of the constituent atoms in alloys (54), optical and photoemission properties (48, 49), and plasma oscillation losses (55). 

---