Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Isomerization model, cooperative

Figure 5, Steady states of the cooperative isomerization model, showing sub-critical (t) = 1), critical (t) — 4), and supercritical (t) = 5 curves of mole fraction x as a function of the forward activation energy t. The deterministic transitions for r/ = 5 are indicated by arrows the dashed line denotes an equal areas construction which determines the unique equilibrium transition (22). Figure 5, Steady states of the cooperative isomerization model, showing sub-critical (t) = 1), critical (t) — 4), and supercritical (t) = 5 curves of mole fraction x as a function of the forward activation energy t. The deterministic transitions for r/ = 5 are indicated by arrows the dashed line denotes an equal areas construction which determines the unique equilibrium transition (22).
RMD Simulation of Chemical Nucleation (22). A series of microscopic computer experiments was performed using the cooperative isomerization model (Eq. 2). This system was selected for the trial simulations for several reasons First, only two chemical species are involved, so that a minimal number of particles is needed. Second, the absence of buffered chemicals (e.g., A and B in the Trimolecular reaction of the next section) eliminates the need for creation or destruction of particles in order to maintain constant populations (19., 22j. Third, the dynamical model of the cooperative mean-field interaction can be examined as a convenient means of introducing cubic or higher nonlinearity into molecular models based on binary collisions. Finally, the need for a microscopic simulation is most apparent for transitions between multi -pie macroscopic states. Indeed, the characterization of spatially localized fluctuations is of obvious importance to the understanding of nucleation phenomena. As for the equilibrium vapor-liquid and liquid-solid transitions, detailed simulations at the molecular level should provide deep physical insight into chemical nucleation processes whkh is unattainable from theory, higher-level simulation, or experiment. [Pg.249]

Fig. 6. A highly idealized model for the plasma albumin molecule to account for the N-F transformation and its relationship to the titration anomaly, the cooperative detergent binding, and the altered solubility behavior of the low pH form. The model contains four folded amphipathic subunits, the hydrophobic surfaces being buried in the N form and exposed in the F form. Holes around the periphery of the molecule represent the 10 to 12 strong binding sites for detergent ions which are destroyed, upon isomerization, with the exposure of a large number of weaker sites. Reprinted with permission from Foster (1960). Copyright by Academic Press, Inc. Fig. 6. A highly idealized model for the plasma albumin molecule to account for the N-F transformation and its relationship to the titration anomaly, the cooperative detergent binding, and the altered solubility behavior of the low pH form. The model contains four folded amphipathic subunits, the hydrophobic surfaces being buried in the N form and exposed in the F form. Holes around the periphery of the molecule represent the 10 to 12 strong binding sites for detergent ions which are destroyed, upon isomerization, with the exposure of a large number of weaker sites. Reprinted with permission from Foster (1960). Copyright by Academic Press, Inc.
A cooperative model for isomerization was proposed to explain the effect of intense laser irradiation. In this model, the formation of excited or transient states in close proximity can transiently provide enough free volume for isomerization to occur. This work with NOSH has been complemented by studies using 6-nitro-BIPS and NIPS [109,110]. This cooperative model is shown in Figure 12. [Pg.397]

Fig. 5. Conceptual schematic of the receptor conformational states elicited by binding to partial (L, ) or full (Ly) agonists, and a depiction of the correlation between the various conformational states and their ability to bind with G proteins. Solid lines show the conformational distributions hypothesized from soluble ternary complex data analyzed by the simple ternary complex model. When a partial agonist binds with a receptor (L R) in this model, the receptor forms a conformational state which has an intermediate affinity for G protein, consequendy leading to formation of intermediate amounts of L RG. On the other hand, the dotted line represents the potential receptor conformations induced by a partial agonist consistent with the extended ternary complex model, which includes the isomerization of receptor between R and R, the only receptor conformation allowed to bind with G protein. For this model, the interactions of a partial agonist with a receptor would result in two populations of ligand-bound receptors with only one (LR ) able to bind with G protein. The x-axis is analogous to the cooperativity factor a. Fig. 5. Conceptual schematic of the receptor conformational states elicited by binding to partial (L, ) or full (Ly) agonists, and a depiction of the correlation between the various conformational states and their ability to bind with G proteins. Solid lines show the conformational distributions hypothesized from soluble ternary complex data analyzed by the simple ternary complex model. When a partial agonist binds with a receptor (L R) in this model, the receptor forms a conformational state which has an intermediate affinity for G protein, consequendy leading to formation of intermediate amounts of L RG. On the other hand, the dotted line represents the potential receptor conformations induced by a partial agonist consistent with the extended ternary complex model, which includes the isomerization of receptor between R and R, the only receptor conformation allowed to bind with G protein. For this model, the interactions of a partial agonist with a receptor would result in two populations of ligand-bound receptors with only one (LR ) able to bind with G protein. The x-axis is analogous to the cooperativity factor a.
First Order Chemical Phase Transition in a Cooperative Isomerization Reaction. S convenient model of a first order transition is provided by a reversible isomerization reaction in a macroscopically homogeneous system... [Pg.242]

A Discrete Model of Cooperative Isomerization. The algorithm which implements the method of reactive molecular dynamics (RMD) is understood best in the context of a specific application. Therefore let us specialize now to the simple isomerization reaction (Eq. 2) to address the questions of "chemical nucleation" raised in that context. Only the main ideas are stressed here. [Pg.244]


See other pages where Isomerization model, cooperative is mentioned: [Pg.358]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.574]    [Pg.246]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.248 , Pg.249 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info