Irreducible representation definition

D. Definitions of Young diagrams, tableaux, and operators should be understood, as well as the property of the Young operator of projecting onto an irreducible representation (Theorems 1 and 2). 

There is an important surjective group homomorphism from 5 U (2) to 50(3). We will find the homomorphism useful in Section 6.6 for deriving the list of irreducible representations of 50(3) from the list of irreducible representations of 50(2). There is no a priori reason to expect such a homomorphism between two arbitrary groups, so the fact that 50(2) and 50(3) are related in this way is quite special. Here is the definition of 4> ... 

In this section we will use the idea of invariant subspaces of a representation (see Definition 5.1) to define irreducible representations. Then we will prove Schur s lemma, which tells us that irreducible representations are indeed good building blocks. 

Definition 6.2 Suppose (G, V, p) is a representation and (G. VE, pyy) is a subrepresentation. Suppose that (G, VE, pw) is an irreducible representation. Then we call VE an irreducible subspace or an irreducible invariant subspace... 

We start with a convenient definition. Just as prime powers play a particular role in number theory, Cartesian sums of copies of one irreducible representation play a particular role in representation theory. 

Since it can be shown that "( ), like the original Hamiltonian H, commutes with the transformation operators Om for all operations R of the point group to which the molecule belongs, the MOs associated with a given orbital energy will form a function space whose basis generates a definite irreducible representation of the point group. This is exactly parallel to the situation for the exact total electronic wavefunctions. 

The hydrides HM(PF3)4, M = Co, Rh, Ir, possess a structure simUar to that of HCo(CO)4. In C3v skeletal symmetry the filled metal orbitals are of symmetry e(2), the Rh-H a bond transforms as a, and the metal-phosphorus a bonds span the irreducible representations a,(2) + e. Three low-energy peaks (Table XXIX) (169, 227) have been detected in the UPS of HCo(PF3)4, and overlapping of ionization occurs with the Rh and Ir compounds (Fig. 28). While the assignments cannot be regarded as definitive at the present time, the first two peaks in the UPS of HCo(PF3)4 probably correspond to the two 2E ionic states of predominant metal character. 

The angular momentum components span a definite irreducible representation (IR) of the given point group (Table 9), and thus its matrix element vanishes unless the direct product of the IRs for the bra kets contains the IR of the Ifl-operator hence... 

For a symmetrical atomic or molecular system, these considerations place a severe restriction on the possible eigenfunctions of the system. All possible eigenfunctions must form bases for some irreducible representation of the group of symmetry operations. The form of the possible eigenfunctions is also determined to a large extent since they must transform in a quite definite way under the operations of the group. 

The determinantal functions must be linearly independent and eigenfunctions of the spin operators S2 and Sz, and preferably they belong to a specified row of a specified irreducible representation of the symmetry group of the molecule [10, 11]. Definite spin states can be obtained by applying a spin projection operator to the spin-orbital product defining a configuration [12]. Suppose d>0 to be the solution of the Hartree-Fock equation. From functions of the same symmetry as d>0 one can build a wave function d>,... 

In general, symmetry conditions are part of the characterization of a definite type of quantity in a physical space. Tensors and tensor spaces were universal objects for the representation of the linear group transformations that are fundamental for the expansion of the chemical quantum theory of bonding. All the irreducible representations could then be characterized by some symmetry condition inside some tensor power of the state space, symbolized as V. Thus, a broad correspondence between the representations of the symmetric group and the irreducible representations inside the state space (representations of order k ) played an important role for the answer to the first question. 

Since the left-hand sides are identical, it is seen that, due to the phase difference in the definition of the F (/) function and the 3-j symbol [analogously to Eq. (18)], the two reduced matrix elements in Eqs. (28a) and (28b) are identical. The operator set as well as the sets of functions are supposed to transform according to irreducible representations, and the labels i and as introduce extra parameters when necessary. 

---