Intramolecular electron delocalization interactions

Dithiolene complexes with the maleonitriledithiolate (mnt) ligand form highly delocalized systems and are widespread in studies of conducting and magnetic materials. The electronic properties have been extensively studied with various computational methods including Hiickel and extended Hiickel approaches to identify the nature of the orbitals involved in intramolecular and intermolecular interactions. These structural properties allow the complexes to interact in the solid state via short stacking S, S and short interstack S---S contacts.10 4-1048... 

The intramolecular flexibilities of poly(1,4-phenylene oxide), polyi2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide), poly(2-methyl-6-phenyl-1,4-phenylene oxide), and poly 2,6-diphenyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) are evaluated through estimation of the resistance to rotation about the Cj 4—0 bonds in their backbones. A 6-12 potential is used to account for the van der Waals interactions between nonbonded atoms and groups encountered during the backbone rotations, while the twofold intrinsic potential to rotation about the C14—0 bonds resulting from the -electron delocalization is also included. 

An increase in the electronic coupling interaction results in the disappearance of the ET barrier and complete delocalization of the transferred electron between the donor and the acceptor. Such effects have been extensively studied for intramolecular ET in bridged intervalence compounds [57]. As regards intermolecular systems, the only spectrally and structurally characterized system has been that of NO+/arene complexes [28]. 

The balance of electrostatic and delocalization interactions in an isolated molecule may be perturbed by the influence of the solvent. In calculations based on Eq. 7, the analysis of solvation-energy terms suggested that the electrostatic contribution stabilizing the ap orientation of the acetal s ment is the conformationally dominant term. For example, in 2-methoxyoxane, the difference in energy of the (ap, ap) and (ap, sc) conformers in water, compared to that in the isolated molecule, caused by solute-solvent electrostatic interactions alone, amounts to 4 kJ.mor. Accordingly, the inter-and intra-molecular, electrostatic interactions operate in reverse directions in acetals. Whereas the intramolecular, electrostatic interactions are responsible, together with delocalization interactions, for the aiq)earance of the anomeric, reverse anomeric, and exo-anomeric effects, the solute-solvent electrostatic interactions lessen their im nitude, and may even cancel them. Of course, the solvent may also influence the electron distribution and energy of MO s in a molecule. In this way, the orbital interactions of lone-pairs and delocalization contributions to the anomeric effect may be scaled by the solvent, but this mechanism of the environmental effect is, in most cases, of only minor importance. 

Abstract In this chapter we discuss the influence of ir-electron delocalization on the properties of H-bonds. Hence the so-called resonance-assisted hydrogen bonds (RAHBs) are characterized since such systems are mainly classified in the literature as those where TT-electron delocalization plays a very important role. Both the intramolecular and intermolecular RAHBs are described. RAHBs are often indicated as very strong interactions thus, their possible covalent nature is also discussed. Examples of the representative crystal structures as well as the results of the ab initio and DFT calculations are presented. Additionally the RAHB systems, and the other complexes where rr-electron delocalization effects are detectable, are characterized with the use of the QTAIM (Quantum Theory Atoms in Molecules ) method. The decomposition scheme of the interaction energy is applied to expand the knowledge of the nature of the RAHBs. 

There is no difference between the enol-keto and keto-enol 0-H- 0 H-bridge and no difference for the double-single conjugated bonds, especially if R1 and R3 substituents are equivalent. Hence Buemi and Zuccarello [13] proposed to use A = (1 — Q/Qo) since in such a case 0 corresponds to the system with the lack of TT-electron delocalization and A = 1 to the full delocalization with the movement of H-atom to the middle of O- O distance or nearly so. It is worth mentioning that, similar for intramolecular H-bonds, an enhancement of H-bond strength may be observed for intermolecular interactions [3, 5]. Scheme 3 presents an example of a system often found in crystal structures. 

Abstract The agostic bond defines an intramolecular interaction where a a bond is geometrically close to an electron deficient centre (often a transition metal). The computational studies on this energetically weak interaction are reviewed and discussed. Various types of a bonds have been considered (C-H, C-C, Si-H, Si-C, B-H). It is suggested that a C-X bond in which X carries a lone pair should preferably not be viewed as agostic. The factors that contribute to his occurrence are discussed. In particular, the agostic interaction is very sensitive to steric effects. Explanations based on molecular orbital analysis, electron delocalization and topological analysis of the electron density are presented. 

---