Intracellular urea concentration

Now, let us examine the limitations of the one-compartment model. First, the entire blood and tissue are assumed to be in equilibrium. However, it is well known that intracellular urea concentration may be significantly different frmn die extracellular compartment. Moreover, urea may be preferentially produced in certain organs like the brain, heart, muscle, etc. An accurate treatment requires a multicompartment model. 

With an increase in pH, there is an increased absorption of mercuric chloride [6, 7], whereas accumulation of mercury in the intestinal tissue decreases. Mercury absorption is inversely proportional to its accumulation in the tissue. An increase in water absorption due to hypotonicity or an increase in concentration of sodium ions or urea increases the mercury absorption and accumulation in the epithelial cell, without change in the intracellular distribution pattern [8], Thus, the absorption of mercury is thought to accompany the solvent drag and to be influenced by pH change in the intestinal lumen. 

The consequences of disordered osmolality are due to the changes in volume which arise as w ater moves in or out of cells to maintain osmotic balance. Note that of the three examples above, only glucose cau.ses significant lluid movement. Gluco.se cannot freely enter cells, and an increasing ECF concentration causes waterto move out of cells and leads to intracellular dehydration. Urea and ethanol permeate cells and do not cause such lluid shifts, as long as concentration changes occur slowly. 

By extracting water from intracellular compartments, osmotic diuretics expand the extracellular fluid volume, decrease blood viscosity, and inhibit renin release. These effects increase RBF, and the increase in renal medullary blood flow removes NaCl and urea from the renal medulla, thus reducing medullary tonicity. Under some circumstances, prostaglandins may contribute to the renal vasodilation and medullary washout induced by osmotic diuretics. A reduction in medullary tonicity causes a decrease in the extraction of water from the DTL, which limits the concentration of NaCl in the tubular fluid entering the ATL. This latter effect diminishes the passive reabsorption of NaCl in the ATL. In addition, osmotic diuretics may also interfere with transport processes in the TAL. 

The relative proportion of extra- and intracellular fluid has been determined by the dilution technique. Chemicals of known distribution in the body fluids are administered, and the volume of a given fluid compartment can be measured by determining the concentration of these chemicals. For example, Evans blue, bromosulftalein, iodinated albumin, and iodine 131 are used to determine plasma volume. Urea, thiourea, deuterium, and tritiated water are useful for determining the total body fluids. Thiocyanate, iodide, sulfate, mannitol, sucrose, raffmose, chloride 36, chloride 38, and bromide 32 are used to determine extracellular space. 

As already mentioned, irritability, inability to concentrate, and borderline mental distortions are observed in uremic patients. These symptoms may develop into severe disorientation, delusions, and psychosis as the disease evolves. Dialysis does not always restore the psychiatric balance in uremic patients. Some patients have been observed to deteriorate mentally even when the blood urea content is reduced. Two explanations have been proposed for this discrepancy. One mechanism proposes that urea is removed more rapidly from extra- than intracellular fluid as a result, water is pumped in the intracellular space. 

---