Intercomponent interaction level

In Fig. 15.15, the dependence bjj) is adduced, which is broken down into two parts. On the first of them, corresponding to the range oiT= 293 363 K, the intercomponent interaction level is intensified at / decreasing (i.e., b reduction is observed and on the second one, corresponding to the range of T = 373 413K, = const independent on value f. These results correspond... 

Amorphous glassy polymers as natural nanocomposites puts forward to the foreground their study intercomponent interactions, that is, interactions nanoclusters - loosely packed matrix. This problem plays always one of the main roles at multiphase (multicomponent) systems consideration, since the indicated interactions or interfacial adhesion level defines to a great extent such systems properties [42]. Therefore, the authors of Ref. [43] studied the physical principles of intercomponent adhesion for natural nanocomposites on the example of PC. 

Hence, the stated above results have demonstrated, that interactions nanoclusters-loosely packed matrix type (large friction or perfect adhesion) is defined by nanoclusters butt-end and side (cylindrical) surfaces areas ratio or their geometry if the first from the mentioned areas is larger that the second one then a large friction nanoclusters-loosely packed matrix is realized if the second one exceeds the first one, then between the indicated structural components perfect adhesion is realized. In the second from the indicated cases intercomponent adhesion level does not depend on the men-... 

The associated bottom-up process thus relies on the identification of building blocks connected by weak (i.e., noncovalent) interactions and possessing specific physicochemical properties, which can be further tuned by intercomponent communications operating at the (supra)molec-ular level (Lehn, 1995). 

---