Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Integral transforms property

The theoretical basis on which this kind of analysis is based is a Fourier transform property of the global integrated intensity on the reciprocal space. [Pg.137]

Integral-Transform Method A number of integral transforms are used in the solution of differential equations. Only one, the Laplace transform, will be discussed here [for others, see Integral Transforms (Operational Methods) ]. The one-sided Laplace transform indicated by L[f(t)] is defined by the equation L[f(t)] = Jo f t)e st dt. It has numerous important properties. The ones of interest here are L[f(t)] = sL[f(t)] -/(0) L[f"(t) = /(0) f( 0) ... [Pg.34]

First, it is possible to simplify the secular equation (2) by means of symmetry. It can be shown by group theory (140) that, in general, the integrals Hi and Si are nonzero only if the orbitals < , and j have the same transformation properties under all the symmetry elements of the molecule. As a simple example, the interaction between an s and a pn orbital which have different properties with respect to the nodal plane of the pn orbital is clearly zero. Interaction above the symmetry plane is cancelled exactly by interaction below the plane (Fig. 13). It is thus possible to split the secular determinant into a set of diagonal blocks with all integrals outside these blocks identically zero. Expansion of the determinant is then simply the product of those lower-order determinants, and so the magnitude of the... [Pg.16]

The most common technique for the derivation of fundamental solutions is to use integral transforms, such as, Fourier, Laplace or Hankel transforms [29, 39]. For simple operators, such as the Laplacian, direct integration and the use of the properties of the Dirac delta are typically used to construct the fundamental solution. For the case of a two-dimensional Laplace equation we can use a two-dimensional Fourier transform, F, to get the fundamental solution as follows,... [Pg.516]

Integral transforms can be used to solve ordinary differential equations by converting them to algebraic equations. In what follows, the convolution properties of the different transforms have been listed, followed by the methods of integral transform used to solve (a) one-dimensional diffusion equations in the infinite and semi-infinite domains and (b) Laplace equations in the cylindrical geometries. [Pg.156]

This relation describes not only periodic deformations of a liquid surface. Using methods of integral transformations it is possible to show that the dynamic surface elasticity is a fundamental surface property and its value determines the system response to a small arbitrary surface dilation [161]. With this method it is also possible to determine the dynamic elasticity of liquid-liquid interfaces where the surfactant is soluble in both adjacent phases [133]. Moreover, similar transformations lead to an expression for the dynamic surface elasticity for the case when the mechanism of the slow step of micellisation is determined by scheme (5.185) or for frequencies corresponding to the fast step of micellisation [133,134]. However, as stated above, it is the slow process which mainly influences the adsorption kinetics from micellar solutions. [Pg.484]

In the case of the electron-repukion integrals, we noted that the electron-repulsion operator (l/ri2) was sphe ic dly symmetric" and so it is only the permutation (transformation) properties of the basis functions which mattered in using molecular symmetry. The situation is similar in the case of the one-electron integrals ... [Pg.239]

The tramsformation properties of the electron-repulsion integrals are not explicitly needed in an SCF calculation since they appear in particular linear combinations which have one-electron transformation properties (within the matrices J and K). [Pg.633]

The fact that the two matrices and K. were calculated from different orderings of the repulsion integrals does not affect the transformation properties, of course. There is no reason why the relationship between the electron-repulsion integrals... [Pg.644]

The application of the Sturm-Liouville integral transform using the general linear differential operator (11.45) has now been demonstrated. One of the important new components of this analysis is the self-adjoint property defined in Eq. 11.50. The linear differential operator is then called a self-adjoint dijferential operator. [Pg.501]

Before we apply the Sturm-Liouville integral transform to practical problems, we should inspect the self-adjoint property more carefully. Even when the linear differential operator (Eq. 11.45) possesses self-adjointness, the self-adjoint property is not complete since it actually depends on the type of boundary conditions applied. The homogeneous boundary condition operators, defined in Eq. 11.46, are fairly general and they lead naturally to the self-adjoint property. This self-adjoint property is only correct when the boundary conditions are unmixed as defined in Eq. 11.46, that is, conditions at one end do not involve the conditions at the other end. If the boundary conditions are mixed, then the self-adjoint property may not be applicable. [Pg.501]

Obviously, we can define an inner product to have any form at this point, but there will be only one definition of the inner product that will make the operator L self-adjoint, a property discussed earlier in the application of integral transforms. The inner product (i.e., the operation between two elements) is not known at this stage, but it will arise naturally from the analysis of the associated eigenproblem. [Pg.529]

Having defined the eigenfunctions (i.e., the orthogonal basis), the inner product and the self-adjoint property, we are ready to apply the integral transform to the physical system (Eq. 11.189). [Pg.533]

Thus, to solve the problem up to this point we have used the inner product, the eigenproblem and the self-adjoint property of the linear operator. It is recalled that the actions taken so far are identical to the Sturm-Liouville integral transform treated in the last section. The only difference is the element. In the present case, we are dealing with multiple elements, so the vector (rather than scalar) methodology is necessary. [Pg.534]

This equation describes many transient heat and mass transfer processes, such as the diffusion of a solute through a slab membrane with constant physical properties. The exact solution, obtained by either the Laplace transform, separation of variables (Chapter 10) or the finite integral transform (Chapter 11), is given as... [Pg.578]

This set of equations has been solved analytically in Chapter 11 using the finite integral transform method. Now, we wish to apply the orthogonal collocation method to investigate a numerical solution. First, we note that the problem is symmetrical in at = 0 and as well as in at = 1. Therefore, to make full use of the symmetry properties, we make the transformations... [Pg.594]

The evaluation of R[C], Eq. (32), requires the same computational work as a single SCF iteration, and the iterative solution of the Cl equations (complete in the given basis) requires the same work as an SCF treatment since no integral transformation is required. The present formulation of the two-electron problem is not only formally simple, but it is also ideally suited for applications. These advantages are basically a consequence of the transformation properties (24)-(26), which result from the special ansatz (19) for the wavefunction. [Pg.511]

These techniques are clearly related to the direct Cl method of Roos and of Siegbahn and are probably best called matrix oriented direct Cl procedures . The matrix formulation—essentially derived from the transformation properties (24)-(26) —reduces logic in computer codes to a minimum and makes these methods ideally suited for vector computers. The matrix oriented formulations do not require a complete integral transformation. This fact is an advantage mainly for large basis sets and small numbers of correlated electron pairs since the integral transformation is relatively unimportant otherwise. ... [Pg.511]

We have used the fact that the integration in this matrix element runs over electronic coordinates, and does not affect the nuclear coordinates. The Wigner-Eckart theorem can be applied to derive the selection rules. Since the Hamiltonian is invariant under the elements of the symmetry group, the transformation properties of the operator part in this matrix element will be determined by the partial derivatives, d/dQry-Aswt have seen in Sect. 1.3, a partial derivative in a variable has the same transformation properties as the variable itself. The operator part is thus given by ... [Pg.129]

Based on the Fourier inverse transformations properties, the inverse Fourier transformation of Eq. (5.17) involves only the inversion of the sign in the appeared exponential. Generally, the Fourier transformation of integral form has a inverse transformation still as an integral form, yet, in this case being about the electronic density in a crystal, i.e., presenting a periodicity. Thus, the inverse transformation of the Eq. (5.17) will be written as a sum, generating the electronic density equation ... [Pg.505]

The Kronig-Kramers relationships are a very general set of integral transforms that find wide application in phjreical problems. They are intimately related to Hilbert transforms which, subject to certain integrability and analyticity conditions, allow the real and imaginary parts of a complex function f(z) = u iv to >t expressed as a pair of transform mates. This property follows from the fact that u and v are not completely independent when / z) is analytic in the whole upper half of the complex plane. [Pg.87]

In order to evaluate this contribution one needs only all excitation energies and corresponding transition dipole moments for molecule A and also for molecule B. Both can be obtained from the poles and residues of a polarization propagator for molecule A and separately for molecule B as described in Section 7.4. However, it is preferable to avoid the simultaneous summation over all states and express the dispersion energy in terms of molecular properties. This can be achieved by using the following integral transform... [Pg.171]

We would like to express the dispersion energy in terms of response properties of molecules A and B since this allows for a physical interpretation of the dispersion interaction. Such an expression is obtained applying an integral transform to avoid the summation of the A and B excitation energies in the denominator of O Eq. 11.115 and using the multipole expansion of the perturbing operator... [Pg.387]

The Fourier integral transformation as formulated in Eqs. 1 and 2 has the mathematical property (known as Rayleigh s or Parseval s theorem)... [Pg.2938]


See other pages where Integral transforms property is mentioned: [Pg.230]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.627]    [Pg.423]    [Pg.2279]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.485]    [Pg.2937]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.181]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.162 ]




SEARCH



Integral property

Integral transformation

Property integration

Transform integral

Transform properties

© 2024 chempedia.info