Individual structure-complexation property models

E-state indices, counts of atoms determined for E-state atom types, and fragment (SMF) descriptors. Individual structure-complexation property models obtained with nonlinear methods demonstrated a significantly better performance than the models built using MLR. However, the consensus models calculated by averaging several MLR models display a prediction performance as good as the most efficient nonlinear techniques. The use of SMF descriptors and E-state counts provided similar results, whereas E-state indices led to less significant models. For the best models, the RMSE of the log A- predictions is 1.3-1.6 for Ag+and 1.5-1.8 for Eu3+. 

The above-mentioned complexity of the relationships between the structure and properties of textiles is further complicated by the non-linear mechanical properties of individual fibres caused by their visco-elastic behaviour, friction between fibres and threads, anisotropy, and statistical distribution of all properties. Modelling such complex materials requires application of a combination of experimental, analytical, and numerical methods, which will be considered in this chapter. 

Gas-phase solvation has so far given only very indirect evidence concerning the structure and details of molecular interactions in solvation complexes. Complex geometries and force constants, which are frequently subjects of theoretical calculations, must therefore be compared with solution properties, however, the relevant results are obscured by influences arising from changes in the bulk liquid or by the dynamic nature of the solvation shells. With few exceptions, structural information from solutions cannot be adequately resolved to yield more than a semiquantitative picture of individual molecular interactions. The concepts used to convert the complex experimental results to information for structural models are often those of solvation numbers 33>, and of structure-making or structure-... 

Crystals of stoichiometric 1 1 mixtures of compounds that can complex with each other have been shown to form preferentially to pure crystals of the individual components. In some cases these crystals may have potential non-linear optical properties. An interesting example is the 1 1 mixture of p-aminobenzoic acid and 3,5-dinitrobenzoic acid. (15) A view of the crystal structure is shown in figure 3. Examination of this figure leads one to the hypothesis that the preference for the mixed crystal may be due to a) a more stable H-bonding interaction between the different benzoic acids in the hetero-dimer than in the homo-dimer b) the ability of the mixed crystal (hetero- dimers) to H-bond between their amino and nitro groups. It is likely that both of these factors play a role in the stability of the crystal structure. Calculational modelling can aid in determining the importance of these factors. 

In the Reusch model , the complexes have the liquid properties of polymer electrolytes and this suggests a family of conformations rather than a single defined structure. In the Seebach model , several PHB molecules surround the PolyP unit. Individual PHB chains are free to adopt various positions in the phospholipid lattice hence, a well-defined structure is again unlikely. Further studies may help us in choosing one of these two proposed models. 

Recently, Riviere and Brooks (2007) published a method to improve the prediction of dermal absorption of compounds dosed in complex chemical mixtures. The method predicts dermal absorption or penetration of topically applied compounds by developing quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) models based on linear free energy relations (LFERs). The QSPR equations are used to describe individual compound penetration based on the molecular descriptors for the compound, and these are modified by a mixture factor (MF), which accounts for the physical-chemical properties of the vehicle and mixture components. Principal components analysis is used to calculate the MF based on percentage composition of the vehicle and mixture components and physical-chemical properties. 

However, this assumption is not necessarily justified. Even for a well-faceted nanoparticle there are a number of nonequivalent adsorption sites. For example, in addition to the low-index facets, the palladium nanoparticle exhibits edges and interface sites as well as defects (steps, kinks) that are not present on a Pd(l 1 1) or Pd(lOO) surface. The overall catalytic performance will depend on the contributions of the various sites, and the activities of these sites may differ strongly from each other. Of course, one can argue that stepped/kinked high-index single-crystal surfaces (Fig. 2) would be better models (64,65), but this approach still does not mimic the complex situation on a metal nanoparticle. For example, the diffusion-coupled interplay of molecules adsorbed on different facets of a nanoparticle (66) or the size-dependent electronic structure of a metal nanoparticle cannot be represented by a single crystal with dimensions of centimeters (67). It is also shown below that some properties are merely determined by the finite size or volume of nanoparticles (68). Consequently, the properties of a metal nanoparticle are not simply a superposition of the properties of its individual surface facets. 

---