Indifferent states between

In every example that we have discussed, we have pointed out that it is possible to transfer matter at constant pressure and temperature between the phases present without causing any change in the composition of any phase. This observation permits another definition of an indifferent state of... 

In this discussion of indifferent states we have always used the entropy, energy, and volume as the possible extensive variables that must be used, in addition to the mole numbers of the components, to define the state of the system. The enthalpy or the Helmholtz energy may also be used to define the state of the system, but the Gibbs energy cannot. Each of the systems that we have considered has been a closed system in which it was possible to transfer matter between the phases at constant temperature and pressure. The differentials of the enthalpy and the Helmholtz and Gibbs energies under these conditions are... 

Comparison of (29.77) with (29.63) shows immediately the close similarity between the indifferent line of a polyvariant system, and the equilibrium line of a monovariant system. This similarity is perhaps less surprising when we remember that all equilibrium states of a monovariant system are indifferent states. Thus (29.63) can be regarded as a particular case of (29.77), for in this case, since w = l,... 

The other determinants defining the indifferent state can be formed by replacing the last line of (29.100), by one of the other lines of (29.96) which have not been used that is to say the line relating to a component between (i/jg+l) and Cg. The development of such a determinant will make use of the same set of minors as in (29.101), and we have in general... 

Similarity between Indifferent States and Monovariant Systems. 

In the same way, for an indifferent state of a closed poly variant system, the temperature is sufficient to determine p and the composition of the phases, but not the masses of the individual phases. Furthermore, as we have seen, the law governing the variations hp and hT along an indifferent line, are of just the same form as the law which relates Sp and ST along the equilibrium states of a monovariant system. However, a profound difference is apparent between monovariant systems, and indifferent states of a pol3rvariant system when we consider the possibility of a closed system moving along the line of indifference. A closed mono variant system can clearly traverse its indifferent line, for this is simply its equilibrium line on the other hand, for a polyvariant closed system the ability to move along the indifferent line is exceptional as we shall now proceed to show. 

FIGURE 2-2. Standard gamble for a chronic health status. The subject is offered the choice between A and B. A involves the certainty of living in health state /(a suboptimal health state) for a specified period of time. 6 involves an intervention that could lead to full health for the same period of time or immediate death. The probabilities associated with the outcomes of healthy and dead are p and 1 — p, respectively. As p is varied, the indifference point between choices A and B represents the utility of state /. 

The alternatives between which an individual has to decide may be actions, or states of affairs or intricate combinations of actions and consequences. But it may be useful at this stage to consider the simple case of an individual s choice between alternative quantities of commodities (or characteristics) which are constrained to lie within a convex set. Fig. 1 illustrates the case with two goods, the chosen quantities of which cannot lie outside the convex set bounded by CS and the two axes, and two alternative points of view, or forms of assessment Ix is the highest indifference curve achievable with respect to the first ordering (point of view) and /j that for the second ordering. For any given ordinal representation of u(( ) and u2( ), as we... 

The experience of the Department of the Interior over the past years has clearly revealed one basic fact—water problems, in one form or another, touch all 50 states of the union. These problems vary from area to area, ranging from shortage to excess. Regardless of the cause, as a nation we can no longer regard with indifference the increasing imbalance between the supply and demand for water in the United States. 

This fact, of course, throws no light on the question whether there exists an indifferent relative motion of both molecules or whether for some reason or other only one definite configuration occurs in practice (i.e. one representing a state of equilibrium), or finally whether we must suppose that an equilibrium between several configurations is rapidly reached. 

FIGURE 2-3. Time tradeoff for a chronic health state. The subject chooses between living a varying amount of time in full health (x) and living a specified amount of time it) in state /. The length of time in full health is shortened until the subject is indifferent between the two choices. The value of health state i hj) is then calculated by dividing x/t. 

C. Equilibrium between Solid and Liquid Phases only. I. The Components are Completely Miscible in the Liquid State. a) The pure components only occur as solid phases. Polymorphism of components. Determination of the equilibrium curve. Example, b) Compounds are formed with a congruent meltings point. The indifferent point. Determination of the composition of a compound by thermal analysis. Examples, (c) Compounds are formed with an %ncongruent melting-point. Determination of the composition of the coinpound by thermal analysis. Example. (d) Solid solutions or " mixed crystals are formed, i) The two components can form an unbroken series of solid solutions. Examples. Melting-point curve. Example. Fractional crystallisation of solid solutions, h) The two components do not form a continuous series of solid solutions. Examples. Changes in solid solutions with the temperature. II. The Components are not Completely Miscible in the Liquid State. Suspended transformation. 

To get the main idea of the charge effect on adsorption kinetics, it is sufficient to consider an aqueous solution of a symmetric (z z) ionic surfactant in the presence of an additional indifferent symmetric (z z) electrolyte. When a new interface is created or the equilibrium state of an interfacial layer disturbed a diffusion transport of surface active ions, counterions and coions sets in. This transport is affected by the electric field in the DEL. According to Borwankar and Wasan [102], the Gouy plane as the dividing surface marks the boundary between the diffuse and Stem layers (see Fig. 4.10). When we denote the surfactant ion, the counterion and the coion, respectively, with the indices / = 1, 2 and 3, the transport of the ionic species with valency Z/ and diffusion coefficient A, under the influence of electrical potential i, is described by the equation [2, 33] ... 

---