In-ground barriers

Remediation of many contaminated sites has been achieved by covering the surface with clean material incorporating a low-permeability layer. Whereas this may reduce infiltration and form a physical barrier to the contamination it may not necessarily control adequately the movement of contaminants. In order to provide adequate control it may be necessary to use such cover systems in conjunction with vertical and horizontal in-ground barriers or cut-offs to achieve partial or total isolation of the site. This isolation, in its extreme, can involve the complete enclosure of a site within an impermeable barrier to inhibit the ingress or egress of leachate and gasses in all directions. The following types of containment will be examined ... 

In-ground Barriers. In-ground barriers can be used to isolate, usually by... 

The effectiveness and applicability of barrier methods vary according to the types and nature of contaminants present, physical conditions of the site and the design life of the barrier. The long-term integrity of barrier materials may, in some cases where specific contaminants are present, not be known. Also, at present there is only limited experience with the installation of some barrier types. For example, horizontal in-ground barriers have only been installed in a few instances. Particular problems with their installation include ensuring the... 

A wide range of methods can be used to form in ground barriers. Some typical examples are shown in Figure 7.2. Comprehensive guidance on barrier design and construction has been given in CIRIA Report C149 (Card, 1995), CIRIA Special Publication 124 (Privett et al, 1996) and CIRIA Report C 557 (Barry et al, 2001). The reader is referred to these documents for more detailed information. 

It has also been known for rodents to gnaw through exposed membranes, although the conditions that would allow this (an exposed membrane) are uncommon. Where membranes are used in vertical in ground barriers they must be specified to resist root penetration if close to trees. 

Reduction in gas regime using in ground barriers to prevent... 

U.S. EPA, Permeable Reactive Subsurface Barriers for the Interception and Remediation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbon and Chromium (VI) Plumes in Ground Water, Technical Report EPA-600-F-97-008, U.S. EPA, Washington, 1997. 

Deep geological disposal is the most favored solution for the permanent disposal of nuclear wastes with long half-lives. Although the locations of the burial places are selected with outmost care to avoid migration of the wastes in nature over a very long period of time, no barrier can be safe forever, so, numerous studies are in progress to determine the main factors that could cause leaks of radioactive nuclides. Soluble compounds in ground water are likely to play a major role in the release of actinides. 

In this chapter we will pay most attention to the isolation function of the innermost of the barriers, the waste matrix, and its potential interactions with the contacting water. In addition, and because of the similarities in the processes involved, we will also discuss the key processes that control the mobility of some of the critical components of waste in ground-waters. These key processes are bentonite/ groundwater interactions, which can exert a large influence on the processes controlling the master pH/pe variables, iron corrosion processes responsible for poising the redox potential of the system and the interactions between the waste matrix itself and the contacting fluids, which produce radiolysis reaction processes. 

Energy Barriers in Ground-State Forbidden Reactions... 

Mackenzie K, Koehler R, Weiss H, Kopinke F-D. Dechlorination of chlorohydrocarbons in ground-water using novel membrane-supported Pd catalysts. In Wickramanayake GB, Gavaskar AR, Chen ASC, eds. Chemical Oxidation and Reactive Barriers Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds, Monterey, CA, 20-25 May 2000. Columbus, OH Battelle Press 2000 C2-6 331-338. 

Blowes DW, Mayer KU. An in situ permeable reactive barrier for the treatment of hexavalent chromium and trichloroethylene in ground water Volume 3, Mulitcomponent Reactive Transport Modeling, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/600/R-99/095c, Ada, OK, 1999. 

Benner SG, Blowes DW, Molson JWH. Modeling preferential flow in reactive barriers implications for performance and design. Ground Water 2001 39 371-379. 

Barriers to rotation and conformational states around sp2-sp3 play an important role in the determination of the steric requirement of a substituent. These barriers are predominantly composed by the difference in through-space nonbonding interactions in ground and transition states. They are typically free from electronic contributions, in contrast to the quantitative approach of steric effects, which proceeds through reaction rates or (a + n)-barriers to rotation, in which the steric part is only a perturbation of the energetic content. 

A dimethylamino group presents a steric effect which destabilizes the ground state compared to the steric-free pyrrolidino group (72JCS(P2)451). This is clearly shown in the large difference in experimental barriers in pyrimidine derivatives 91 and 92 (72JCS(P2)451) (Scheme 70). 

---