Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Implicit atoms

For electronic transitions in electron-atom and heavy-particle collisions at high unpact energies, the major contribution to inelastic cross sections arises from scattering in the forward direction. The trajectories implicit in the action phases and set of coupled equations can be taken as rectilinear. The integral representation... [Pg.2056]

The problems that occur when one tries to estimate affinity in terms of component terms do not arise when perturbation methods are used with simulations in order to compute potentials of mean force or free energies for molecular transformations simulations use a simple physical force field and thereby implicitly include all component terms discussed earlier. We have used the molecular transformation approach to compute binding affinities from these first principles [14]. The basic approach had been introduced in early work, in which we studied the affinity of xenon for myoglobin [11]. The procedure was to gradually decrease the interactions between xenon atom and protein, and compute the free energy change by standard perturbation methods, cf. (10). An (issential component is to impose a restraint on the... [Pg.137]

The connectivity information can be given either implicitly by approximating bonding distances between the atoms, or explicitly by a connection table (bond list as shown in Figure 2-20 and 2-25. [Pg.93]

First, a quei y must be drawn using the MOL" ISIS/Draw program. By using this reaction query, a eurrent reaction search " can be performed. This type of reaction retrieval compares the starting material and the product of the reaction query with all the reactions in the CIRX database. Both query structures must match exactly, including the implicit hydrogen atoms not shown in the reaction query. In this case, one hit is found in the CIRX databases. [Pg.265]

In this model of electrostatic in teraction s, two atoms (i and j) have poin t charges tq and qj. The magnitude of the electrostatic energy (V[. , [ ) varies inversely with the distance between the atoms, Rjj. fh e effective dielectric constant is . For in vacuo simulations or simulation s with explicit water rn olecules, the den om in a tor equals uRjj, In some force fields, a distance-dependent dielectric, where the denominator is uRjj Rjj, represen is solvent implicitly. [Pg.27]

Hccausc of Ihc restricted availability of corn ptilation al resources, sorn e force fields use Un itcd. torn types, fli is type of force field represeri ts implicitly all hydrogens associated with a methyl, rn elli yieti e, or rn etii in e group. Th e van der Waals param eters for united atom carbons reflect the increased si/.e because of the implicit (included) hydrogens. [Pg.28]

The Eigenvector Following method is in some ways similar to the Newton-Raph son method. Instead of explicitly calculating the second derivatives, it uses a diagonalized Hessian matrix to implicitly give the second derivatives of energy with respect to atomic displacements. The initial guess is computed empirically. [Pg.60]

We have assumed so far, implicitly, that the interactions are strictly local between neighboring atoms and that long-ranged forces are unimportant. Of course the atom-atom interaction is based on quantum mechanics and is mediated by the electron as a Fermi particle. Therefore the assumption of short-range interaction is in principle a simplification. For many relevant questions on crystal growth it turns out to be a good and reasonable approximation but nevertheless it is not always permissible. For example, the surface of a crystal shows a superstructure which cannot be explained with our simple lattice models. [Pg.879]

In some force fields, especially those using the Lennard-Jones form in eq. (2.12), the /fg parameter is defined as the geometrical mean of atomic radii, implicitly via the geometrical mean rale used for the C and C2 constants. [Pg.22]

The entire formulation of a chemical question can involve a number of issues, some of which are often obscure to the user. Questions such as what components can be substituted at a given atom site, what types of bonds are favorable for a given chemical fragment query (single, double, ring, chain, aromatic, etc.), and should the query contain explicit or implicit substitution, are just a few of the issues facing a user. [Pg.103]


See other pages where Implicit atoms is mentioned: [Pg.94]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.503]    [Pg.846]    [Pg.1760]    [Pg.2223]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.583]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.448]    [Pg.453]    [Pg.753]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.420]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.76 , Pg.83 ]




SEARCH



Implicit

© 2024 chempedia.info