Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Hydrophobic solutes, trends solutions

This model was shown to account for the observed trends of enthalpies, volumes, compressibilities and heat capacities of many types of hydrophobic solutes (hydrocarbons, alcohols and surfactants) In micellar solutions and also for the observed trends for the transfer of hydrophobic solutes to some alcohol-water mixtures. This latter observation supports the view that some alcohol-water mixtures exist as microphases which In many respects resemble micellar systems (11-12). [Pg.80]

The experiments which yielded the diffusion coefficients for acetaminophen in PNIPAAm gel in Fig. 16 also yielded the corresponding partition coefficients. While the diffusion coefficients fit theory, the partition coefficients as plotted in Fig. 18 do not at all. In fact, a trend opposite to theory is observed as the partition coefficients are seen to increase as the gel swelling decreases. In fact, above the transition temperature of the gel, at 35 °C, the partition coefficient is seven times the maximum possible size exclusion coefficient, 1. This implies the dominance of hydrophobic effects over steric effects, since acetaminophen is a relatively small, nonionic but hydrophobic solute, and while the gel mesh size shrinks with increasing temperature, its level of hydrophobicity increases with temperature. [Pg.131]

The classification of solute/cosolvent/water systems based on their relative polarity was suggested by Yalkowsky and Roseman. Solutes which are less polar than both water and the cosolvent are considered as nonpolar , those which have a polarity between those of water and the cosolvent as semipolar , and those which are more polar than both water and cosolvent as polar . Figure 13.21.2.1-a illustrates the behavior of relatively hydro-phobic compounds, which tend to have monotonically increasing solubilization curves. The solubility enhancement is greater for the more hydrophobic solutes. Curves with opposite trends were mostly observed for polar solutes. The monotonical desolubilization... [Pg.191]

The most common location for an a helix in a protein structure is along the outside of the protein, with one side of the helix facing the solution and the other side facing the hydrophobic interior of the protein. Therefore, with 3.6 residues per turn, there is a tendency for side chains to change from hydrophobic to hydrophilic with a periodicity of three to four residues. Although this trend can sometimes be seen in the amino acid sequence, it is not strong enough for reliable stmctural prediction by itself, because residues that face the solution can be hydrophobic and, furthermore, a helices can be either completely buried within the protein or completely exposed. Table 2.1 shows examples of the amino acid sequences of a totally buried, a partially buried, and a completely exposed a helix. [Pg.17]

The next two series of experiments were conducted at a much higher di monosulfonate ratio, approximately 40 60 by weight. The results in entries 10 and 11 and 12-14 (Table 10) indicate that the IFT between saline AOS surfactant solutions and Kern River stock tank oil follow the same trend of decreasing IFT value with increasing hydrophobe carbon number. [Pg.386]

It largely obeys the trend predicted by Equation 1.4. Maximal retention may be expected when both selector and analyte are dissociated to a high degree (i.e., where the product of and reaches a maximum value). For carboxylic acids, this retention maximum is usually found between pH 5 and 6, where the enantiose-lectivity also adopts its optimum (see Figure 1.5). Above this pH, the retention is decreased because (i) the dissociation of the selector becomes increasingly reduced, (ii) the effective counterion concentration may be increased, and (iii) the superimposed hydrophobic retention increment of the solute on the bonded phase loses its... [Pg.10]

The changes in pKa between the aqueous solutions and the micelles must therefore arise from the hydrophobic interactions inside the micelle [27, 31]. In general, the pKa in the micelle is lower than that in its absence, implying that the water molecule inside the micelle is more acidic than that outside. The effect of the hydrophobic interaction of the micellar cavity is further evident in the trend of variation of the pKa with micelle (see Table 1). For all the complexes, the pKa increases in the order anionic SDS > neutral TX-lOO > cationic CTAB. The trend is consistent with the expectation based on consideration of the electrostatic charges in the Stem layer. The anionic SDS micelle, in comparison with CTAB and TX-lOO, stabilizes positive charge on the cationic aqua (pyridinato) ferric heme complexes, and therefore exhibits higher pKa. [Pg.122]

The effect of the micelles on the paramagnetic shifts of the heme was very clearly demonstrated [22] in NMR of labelled cyanide in [Fe(PP)(Ci"N)2]- and [Fe(PP)(py)(Ci N)] in different micelles as well as in the absence of micelles (Fig. 9). A pronounced systematic downfield shift of the bound cyanide signals is observed on going from a solution without micelles to SDS, to TX-lOO and to CTAB micellar solutions which is also the trend in increasing hydrophobicity. The signal is known to be extremely sensitive... [Pg.130]

Similar dependencies on concentration are observed for the osmotic pressure or the electrical conductance of the solution. If we look at the optical turbidity of the solution the trend is opposite. At low concentration the solution is transparent. When the concentration reaches the CMC many solutions become opaque. In parallel, a property, which is of great practical relevance, changes the capacity to solubilize another hydrophobic substance. At concentrations below the CMC of the surfactant, hydrophobic substances are poorly dissolved. At the CMC they start being soluble in aqueous solution. This capability increases with increasing surfactant concentration. There may be small systematic differences in the concentration at which the specific property abruptly changes and the CMC determined by different methods may be different. However, the general trend and the dependency on external parameters such as temperature or salt concentration is always the same. [Pg.251]

Using SFS, Davies and co-workers [77-79] reported enhanced adsorption and competitive adsorption at the hydrophobic surface, reminiscent of that seen at the air-solution interface. For the SDS/PEO mixture [79], competitive adsorption was observed at low concentrations, whereas at higher SDS concentrations, PEO was depleted from the surface. Similar observations were made from IR-ATR measurements by Poirier et al. [80] on CieTAB/PSS mixtures at the silica-solution interface. However, the technique could not distinguish between depletion or surface complex formation. Similar trends were also reported by Fielden et al. [76] for SDS/AM-MAPTC mixtures on mica. For the PEI/SDS mixture at the hydrophobic interface [76], the SFS measurements indicated a higher degree of order and hence adsorption due to complexation at the interface. This was also shown to be strongly pH dependent [81],... [Pg.111]

Aznar et al. (2004) used static headspace-APCI-MS to study the release of volatiles from water and hydroalcoholic systems (12 vol.%). They found a decrease in the headspace concentration of volatile compounds with an increase in the log P values (hydrophobicity values) until log P = 3. Nevertheless, for very non-polar compounds (log P > 3), they did not find this trend this could be due to changes in hydrophobic interactions in the solution. [Pg.423]


See other pages where Hydrophobic solutes, trends solutions is mentioned: [Pg.288]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.1002]    [Pg.1002]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.472]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.476]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.1068]    [Pg.1069]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.412]    [Pg.455]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.343]    [Pg.497]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.571]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.571]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.450]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.234]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.80 ]




SEARCH



Hydrophobic solutes

Hydrophobic solutes, trends

Hydrophobic solutes, trends

Hydrophobicity solutes

Solution hydrophobic

© 2024 chempedia.info