Hydrogen-electron interaction

In the case of the retro Diels-Alder reaction, the nature of the activated complex plays a key role. In the activation process of this transformation, the reaction centre undergoes changes, mainly in the electron distributions, that cause a lowering of the chemical potential of the surrounding water molecules. Most likely, the latter is a consequence of an increased interaction between the reaction centre and the water molecules. Since the enforced hydrophobic effect is entropic in origin, this implies that the orientational constraints of the water molecules in the hydrophobic hydration shell are relieved in the activation process. Hence, it almost seems as if in the activated complex, the hydrocarbon part of the reaction centre is involved in hydrogen bonding interactions. Note that the... 

For XH bonds, where X is any heavy atom, the hydrogen electron density is not thought to be centered at the position of the hydrogen nucleus but displaced along the bond somewhat, towards X. The MMh- force field reduces the XH bond length by a factor of 0.915 strictly for the purposes of calculating van der Waals interactions with hydrogen atoms. 

Imagine a model hydrogen molecule with non-interacting electrons, such that their Coulomb repulsion is zero. Each electron in our model still has kinetic energy and is still attracted to both nuclei, but the electron motions are completely independent of each other because the electron-electron interaction term is zero. We would, therefore, expect that the electronic wavefunction for the pair of electrons would be a product of the wavefunctions for two independent electrons in H2+ (Figure 4.1), which I will write X(rO and F(r2). Thus X(ri) and T(r2) are molecular orbitals which describe independently the two electrons in our non-interacting electron model. 

In the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images, the starch nanoplatelets (SNPs) are believed to aggregate as a result of hydrogen bond interactions due to the surface hydroxyl groups [13] (Fig. lA). Blocking these interactions by relatively large molecular weight molecules obviously improves the individualization of the nanoparticles. The acetylated starch and cellulose nanoparticles (SAcNPs and CelAcNPs) appeared more individualized and monodispersed than their unmodified counterparts with a size of about 50 nm (Fig. IB C). 

A hydrogen atom or a helium cation contains Just one electron, but nearly all other atoms and ions contain collections of electrons. In a multielectron atom, each electron affects the properties of all the other electrons. These electron-electron interactions make the orbital energies of eveiy element unique. 

Santos E, Schmickler W. 2008. Electronic interactions decreasing the activation harrier for the hydrogen electro-oxidation reaction. Electrochim Acta 53 6149-6156. 

The spin magnetic moment Ms of an electron interacts with its orbital magnetic moment to produce an additional term in the Hamiltonian operator and, therefore, in the energy. In this section, we derive the mathematical expression for this spin-orbit interaction and apply it to the hydrogen atom. 

To summarize the key points, D-A reactions are usually concerted processes. The regio- and stereoselectivity can be predicted by applying FMO analysis. The reaction between electron donor dienes and electron acceptor dienophiles is facilitated by Lewis acids, polar solvents, and favorable hydrogen-bonding interactions. The D-A reaction is quite sensitive to steric factors, which can retard the reaction and also influence the stereoselectivity with respect to exo or endo approach. 

Obviously, this cannot be dynamical correlation because at rHH — °o we have two independent hydrogen atoms with only one electron at each center and no electron-electron interaction whatsoever (because l/rHH —> 0). To understand this wrong dissociation behavior... 

This, at first glance innocuous-looking functional FHK[p] is the holy grail of density functional theory. If it were known exactly we would have solved the Schrodinger equation, not approximately, but exactly. And, since it is a universal functional completely independent of the system at hand, it applies equally well to the hydrogen atom as to gigantic molecules such as, say, DNA FHK[p] contains the functional for the kinetic energy T[p] and that for the electron-electron interaction, Eee[p], The explicit form of both these functionals lies unfortunately completely in the dark. However, from the latter we can extract at least the classical Coulomb part J[p], since that is already well known (recall Section 2.3),... 

There is one more problem which is typical for approximate exchange-correlation functionals. Consider the simple case of a one electron system, such as the hydrogen atom. Clearly, the energy will only depend on the kinetic energy and the external potential due to the nucleus. With only one single electron there is absolutely no electron-electron interaction in such a system. This sounds so trivial that the reader might ask what the point is. But... 

---