Hydrocarbons released into the atmosphere

Critics of waste incineration argue that these plants often create more environmental problems than they solve. They point out, for example, that incinerators are a major source of dioxin, mercury, and halogenated hydrocarbon release into the atmosphere. In addition, incinerators are very expensive to build and to maintain, and they provide fewer jobs to members of the surrounding community than other methods of solid waste disposal. Also, companies have a dismal record of siting incinerators in disadvantaged communities, where residents suffer the worst consequences of incinerator use. Finally, waste-to-energy incinerators are of little value in tropical and subtropical countries, where the cost of plants and the availability of additional energy sources make them impractical. 

Auto emissions have been closely monitored, and strict controls have been put Into place to minimize the amount of unbumed hydrocarbons released into the atmosphere. The Clean Air Act of 1990 was passed to help reduce hydrocarbon emissions from automobiles. The catalytic converter was developed to help react the unburned hydrocarbon and produce a less dangerous emission of carbon dioxide and water. (As a side benefit, lead had to be eliminated from gasoline because it poisoned the catalyst and made the catal3dic converter useless. The big campaign to get the lead out removed a major source of the deadly heavy metal from the environment.)... 

Water flashing in the pipestill and hydrocarbon release into the atmosphere... 

---