Host-guest complex structure

Consistency with the host structure and available information on the host-guest complex structure. 

A polyrotaxane with a dendrimer-like structure is known [60]. Based on the observation that [3-CD and sodium deoxycholate (NaDC) 54 forms a 2 1 host guest complex in water, Tato et al. constructed hyperbranched polyrotaxanes 55 by slowly reacting triply branched receptor 53 containing P-CD and NaDC... 

Macrocyclic receptors made up of two, four or six zinc porphyrins covalently connected have been used as hosts for di- and tetrapyridyl porphyrins, and the association constants are in the range 105-106 M-1, reflecting the cooperative multipoint interactions (84-86). These host-guest complexes have well-defined structures, like Lindsey s wheel and spoke architecture (70, Fig. 27a), and have been used to study energy and electron transfer between the chromophores. A similar host-guest complex (71, Fig. 27b) was reported by Slone and Hupp (87), but in this case the host was itself a supramolecular structure. Four 5,15-dipyridyl zinc porphyrins coordinated to four rhenium complexes form the walls of a macrocyclic molecular square. This host binds meso-tetrapyridyl and 5,15-dipyridyl porphyrins with association constants of 4 x 107 M-1 and 3 x 106 M-1 respectively. 

Siderophore-ionophore supramolecular assembly formation via host-guest complexation of the pendant protonated amine arm of ferrioxamine B has been confirmed by X-ray crystallography (Fig. 28) (203). The stability and selectivity of this interaction as a function of ionophore structure, metal ion identity, and counter anion identity were determined by liquid-liquid extraction, isothermal calorimetry, and MS (204 -211). Second-sphere host-guest complexation constants fall in the range 103— 106M-1 in CHC13 and methanol depending on ionophore structure. 

We chose to show the application of techniques employed to study supramolecular dynamics to host systems that have defined binding sites and, therefore, form host-guest complexes with defined stoichiometries. CDs were chosen because they represent a host with only one binding site, and therefore can be viewed as a model system for hosts with the lowest degree of complexity. DNA was chosen because it provides multiple binding sites for small molecules, i.e. intercalative and groove binding, while the DNA is structurally fairly well defined. 

Loeb has reported a series of pseudorotaxanes [84,85] and rotaxanes [86,87] where C-H- 0 hydrogen bonding interactions (together with N+- -O attractive forces) play an important contribution in templating the formation of the interlocked species. In particular, the formation of a pseudorotaxane was observed when equimolar amounts of [pyCH2CH2py]2+ and the crown ether 20 were mixed. The structural characterization of the resulting host-guest complex... 

There are three main types of CDs a-cyclodextrin (a-CD), -cyclodexlrin (p-CD), and y-cyclodextrin (y-CD), which are macrocycles formed by six, seven, and eight sugar ring molecules, respectively. The spatial structure of p-CD is shown on Fig. 3. Review [19] generalizes data on the synthesis, modification, physicochemical and theoretical investigations of CDs, and certain applications particularly for enantio-separation and pharmaceutical applications. CDs are able to form host-guest complexes (pseudorotaxanes) with hydrophobic molecules such as aza-dyes... 

Figure 2. The formation and structure of the OD cationic cage of 5 and its host-guest complex.

Three molecules of the host-guest complex can associate in three-molecular associate (Figure 9.10). This structure was confirmed by light scattering measurements. When free matrix was added to the associated system, dissociation occurs (Figure 9.11). 

---