Hermitian inner product

This expression now defines the dot or inner product (Hermitian inner product) for vectors which can have complex valued components. We use this definition so the dot product of a complex valued vector with itself is real. 

We start with the definition of a complex scalar product (also known as a Hermitian inner product, a complex inner product or a unitary structure on a complex vector space. Then we present several examples of complex scalar product spaces. 

Where the usual Hermitian inner product is denoted with<.,. >, and II. II is used for the associated norm. When A=B, then the tight fi ames and unit norm tight fi ames can be achieved, if 110 11 = 1. 

Appendix Proof of the inner product hermiticity of a subspace of an hermitian space... 

Our first way of answering the last question will be based on the fundamental theorems on Hilbert space [14], Indeed, the theorem on separability tells us that any subspace of h is also a separable Hilbert space. As a consequence, the inner product defined on, say, the occupied subspace is hermitian irrespectively of the choice of the basis x f (/)], as long as this latter satisfies the fundamental requirements of Quantum Mechanics. One should therefore not have to impose this property as a constraint when counting the number of conditions arising from the constraint CC+ =1 but, on the contrary, can take it for granted. 

As a conclusion to this part, when counting the number of conditions arising from CC+ = kv, one does not have to impose the inner product to be hermitian but can take it for granted. 

The quantity f g is called the inner product (or scalar product) of the column vectors f and g. The inner product is a generalization of the dot product (1.55) to vectors with an arbitrary number of complex components. Since a Hermitian operator satisfies (1.13), then (2.63) shows that for a Hermitian matrix A... 

In the lagrangian formulation of quantum theory. S only enters as a phase factor in propagators, but disappears from squared modulus expressions such as transition probabilities [9], This already suggests the invariance of the physical predictions of the theory against different choices of the field G(x). One can also see this directly in the Hamiltonian formulation of quantum theory. If F is hermitian with respect to some inner product. 

Since the eigenfunction n) is not in the Hermitian domain of the Hamiltonian the definition of the inner product that we should use should be questioned. If we will keep the usual definition of the scalar product in quantum mechanics the coefficients an in Eq. 33 will get real positive values only (as well as a(e) in Eq. 32) and the possibility of interference among different resonance states which leads to the trapping of an electron due to the molecular vibrations will be eliminated. As was mentioned before the generalized definition of the inner product (.... ..) rather than the usual scalar product has to be used since the Hamiltonian is... 

The large amplitude of the continuum resonance states is a direct result of the non Hermitian properties of Hamiltonian (i.e. the resonance eigenfunctions which are associated with complex eigenvalues are not in the Hermitian domain of the molecular Hamiltonian). Let us explain this point in some more detail. As was mentioned above Moiseyev and Priedland [7] have proved that if two N x N real symmetric matrices H and H2 do not commute, there exists at least one value of parameter A = such that matrix H + XH2 possesses incomplete spectrum. That is at A A there are at least two specific eigenstates i and j for which ]imx j ei — ej) =0 and also lim ( i j) — 0- Since and ipj are orthogonal (within the general inner product definition i.e., i/ il i/ j) = = 0 not in the... 

For derivation of this equation see the previous section. The notation stands for the generalized inner product which is used in non-Hermitian QM, where (f g) = f g) Note that the eigenenergies,, and eigenstates, Xn(y) > complex due to the complex effective resonance potential. This formula can be generalized for any initial and final states by replacing... 

The creation operators aj, for nonorthogonal spin orbitals are defined in the same way as for orthonormal spin orbitals (1.2.5). As for orthonormal spin orbitals, the anticommutation relations of the creation operators and the properties of their Hermitian adjoints (the annihilation operators) may be deduced from the definition of the creation operators and from the inner product (1.9.2). However, it is easier to proceed in the following manner. We introduce an auxiliary set of symmetrically orthonormalized spin orbitals... 

---