Ground-state XC energy

A more sophisticated ground-state approximate energy functional can be constructed using the frequency-dependent response function of linear response TDDFT. We now introduce the basic formula and then discuss some of the systems this method is being used to study. 

To construct the ground-state energy functional we use the long known adiabatic connection fluctuation-dissipation (ACFD) formula  

Note that when we set XC effects to zero in conventional DFT, we end up with the highly inaccurate Hartree method of 1928. However, when calculating the linear response, if the XC kernel is zero (i.e., if it is within the random phase approximation), the XC energy calculated by Eq. [63] still gives useful results. 

Eurther research is needed to find accurate XC kernels. One method ° that can be used to test these new kernels is to examine the uniform electron gas because the frequency-dependent susceptibility can be found easily with the well-known Lindhard function. Different approximate XC kernels may thus be tested, and their results can be compared to results from highly accurate Monte Carlo simulations. 

---

In this chapter, after a brief introduction to MBPT and Hedin s GW approximation, we will summarise some peculiar aspects of the Kohn-Sham xc energy functional, showing that some of them can be illuminated using MBPT. Then, we will discuss how to obtain ground-state total energies from GW. Finally, we will present a way to combine techniques from many-body and density functional theories within a generalised version of Kohn-Sham (KS) DFT. 

The advantage over the HF scheme is that whereas in conventional ah initio theory we must resort to costly perturbation theory or configuration interaction expansions, in DFT electron correlation is already included explicitly in the exchange-correlation functional. The key problem is instead to find an appropriate expression for xc. As stated above, when we have the correct functional we should be able to extract the exact energy, the exact ground state density, and all properties for our system. 

Below this boundary the recombination to the ground state is preferable above it, the excitation dominates. If = 1.6 eV, then at large Xc = 1.2 eV the border free energy, AG = 0.4 eV, is positive, while at small hc = 0.5 eV the border free energy is negative AG = —0.3 eV. These are cases (a) and (h) compared in Figure 3.54. Beyond the contact approximation the relative positions of the excitation and ionization layers in these cases are the opposite. 

In order to obtain the value of Xc from studying the eigenvalues of a finite-size Hamiltonian matrix, one has to define a sequence of pseudocritical parameters,. Although there is no unique recipe to define such a sequence, in this review we used three methods The first-order method (FOM) can be applied if the the threshold energy is known [8,76], In this method one defines as the value in which the ground-state energy in the iVth-order approximation, E UX), is equal to the threshold energy Ej,... 

The behavior of the ground-state energy, E as a function of X for different values of N is different from the state with 1=1. For 1 = 0 the energy curve goes smoothly to zero as a function of X, but the second derivative function develops a discontinuity in the neighborhood of the critical point, Xc 0.8399 and the critical exponent a = 2. For l = 1, the energy curve bends sharply to zero at the critical point Xc — 4.5409 with a critical exponent a = 1. As one should expect, there is a discontinuity in the first derivative as a function of... 

We will assume that the ground-state energy of the Hamiltonian (20) has a critical exponent a 2 (for example, a short-range potential V(r) and 2 < 6 / 3). The main hypothesis of the spatial finite-size scaling (SFSS) ansatz, which makes the different values of a compatible, is that the coefficient aR, analytical for finite values of R, has to develop a singularity at the exact critical value Xc when R > oo as... 

The many-body ground and excited states of a many-electron system are unknown hence, the exact linear and quadratic density-response functions are difficult to calculate. In the framework of time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) [46], the exact density-response functions are obtained from the knowledge of their noninteracting counterparts and the exchange-correlation (xc) kernel /xcCf, which equals the second functional derivative of the unknown xc energy functional ExcL i]- In the so-called time-dependent Hartree approximation or RPA, the xc kernel is simply taken to be zero. 

Figure 3 represents an opposite situation, with large steric effects and a low 7E-barrier (Case 2). Here the ground state has a large twist angle, and will approaeh 90 and 270 with decreasing xc-barrier. When the molecules pass from the energy minima near = 90 to those near = 270 , they have to pass the steric barrier. If A A and/or D, this process affects the shape of the resonances of prochiral nuclei and can thus be followed by DNMR. It is obvious that the steric barriers at = 0 and = 270 may be different if D and A A. ... 

---