Geometry errors

Geometry errors increase with the size of a system when the number of nonbonded interactions increases, and folded conformations are differently affected than extended ones. That is, MP2-energies calculated at HF-geometries can be inaccurate, because geometry errors are not necessarily the same in different conformations of the same molecule. Regarding the molecular structures it can be shown that, even when differences between MP2 geometries and the HF equivalents are small, they can be significant. 

Geometries converge relatively fast, already at the HF level with a DZP type basis the geometry error is often 1 kcal/mol or less, and a MP2/DZP optimzed geometry is normally sufficient for most applications. The translational and rotational contributions are trivial to calculate, they depend only on the molecular mass and the geometry... 

These calculated geometries do not satisfy even our fairly good criterion and are well short of being accurate the bond lengths are particularly bad. Using the 6-311-i-i-G basis (for FOOF, 88 vs. 60 basis functions for O3, 66 vs. 45 basis functions) we get for calculated geometries (errors) using HF/6-311 + -i-G ... 

Geometry errors for 108 molecules were reported by Scheiner et al. [55], comparing several ab initio and DFT methods. They found that Becke s original three-parameter function (which they denote ACM, for adiabatic connection method B3LYP was developed as a modification of this [49]), with a 6-31G -type and with the 6-3IG ... 

Rivera, M., Lee, W., Ke, G., Marszalek, R E., Cole, D. G., and Clark, R. L. 2008. Minimizing pulling geometry errors in atomic force microscope single molecule force spectroscopy, Biophys J 95, 3991-3998. 

Accurate absolute position control is virtually impossible to achieve with a smoothing system because track geometry errors, ahead of the maintenance machine, will feed into the front reference (ie. the front of the chord) and influence subsequent slues and lifts. This may be a particular problem when attempting to negotiate tied points. 

By means of a suitable software it is quite possible to qualify each drilling. At first a geometry check examines whether the drillings are present and in that case if they are positioned correctly. Furthermore each hole is examined whether the reached temperature level lies within a given threshhold. A typical error is shown in illustration 7. In both filmcooling rows locked holes are to be recognized. 

Abstract. A smooth empirical potential is constructed for use in off-lattice protein folding studies. Our potential is a function of the amino acid labels and of the distances between the Ca atoms of a protein. The potential is a sum of smooth surface potential terms that model solvent interactions and of pair potentials that are functions of a distance, with a smooth cutoff at 12 Angstrom. Techniques include the use of a fully automatic and reliable estimator for smooth densities, of cluster analysis to group together amino acid pairs with similar distance distributions, and of quadratic progrmnming to find appropriate weights with which the various terms enter the total potential. For nine small test proteins, the new potential has local minima within 1.3-4.7A of the PDB geometry, with one exception that has an error of S.SA. 

The results of the optimization for 9 small test proteins, both for the potential with constant weights 1 and with the optimized weights, are given in Table 1. The optimized weights lead to smaller errors the resulting potentials have minima within 1.3-4.7A of the PDB geometry, with one exception that has an error of 8.5A. 

The parameters in the original parameterization are adjusted in order to reproduce the correct results. These results are generally molecular geometries and energy differences. They may be obtained from various types of experimental results or ah initio calculations. The sources of these correct results can also be a source of error. Ah initio results are only correct to some degree of accuracy. Likewise, crystal structures are influenced by crystal-packing forces. 

The next step is to obtain geometries for the molecules. Crystal structure geometries can be used however, it is better to use theoretically optimized geometries. By using the theoretical geometries, any systematic errors in the computation will cancel out. Furthermore, the method will predict as yet unsynthesized compounds using theoretical geometries. Some of the simpler methods require connectivity only. 

---