Gases kinetic energy

This flow parameter is the square root of the ratio of liquid-kinetic-energy to gas-kinetic-energy. 

Gas molecules do not actually bounce off the wall of a container (or your skin) as if it were a uniform massive structure, the way we sketched it in Figure 7.2 they collide with individual atoms at the wall surface, which are also moving because of vibrations. If the temperature of the wall and the gas are the same, on average the gas kinetic energy is as likely to increase or decrease as a result of any single collision. Thus a more accurate statement of the assumption required to derive the ideal gas law is that the walls and gas molecules are at the same temperature, so there is no average energy flow between the two. 

The cohesive forces which hold molecules together in condensed states are electrical in nature, and are effective only over very small distances, perhaps 1 or 2 molecular diameters. When molecules are in the gaseous state, they are so far apart that cohesive forces have no effect on the properties of the gas. Even if two molecules were to collide, or approach very closely, their kinetic energy would be large enough to overcome any attractions, so that they would rebound and go on their separate ways. However, if the temperature, which is a measure of the gas kinetic energy, were continuously lowered, a point would be reached where the cohesive forces could overcome the kinetic forces, and the gas would condense to a liquid. 

Specchla and Baldi [70] proposed an alternate equation of the form first suggested by Turpin and Huntington [82] using the pressure drop as a function of a friction factor for gas-liquid flow in the bed which modifies a gas kinetic energy term, ... 

This flow parameter is the square root of the ratio of liquid kinetic energy to gas kinetic energy. The ordinate of this correlation includes the gas flow rate, the gas and liquid densities, the a/e ratio (which is characteristic of the particular tower packing shape and size), and a liquid viscosity term. Lobo et al proposed the use of a packing factor to characterize a particular packing shape and size [17]. They determined that the a/e ratio did not adequately predict packing hydraulic performance. Eckert further modified this correlation and calculated the packing factors from experimentally determined pressure drops [18]. 

If the gas is entering die column throuj a simple pipe, as it is presented in Fig. 63 [1] the initial flow under packing will be irregular because of the inertial forces and slow dissipation or d gas kinetic energy. 

In order to overcome drawback 1 several nebulisers and spray chambers have been developed. In this field, considerable effort has been dedicated to the design of new pneumatic devices able to efficiently take advantage of the gas kinetic energy. To solve drawback 2, two general choices are available (i) pneumatic concentric nebulisers with modified critical dimensions and (ii) pneumatic nebulisers in which the geometry of the liquid and gas interaction is not concentric. Other non-pneumatic nebulisers have also been designed that overcome either or both of these drawbacks. 

The classical Thomas-Fermi theory is a statistical theory which allows the electrons to move independently of each other. The one-electron wavefunctions are obtained using the classical electrostatic potential only. Corrections to the simple theory are obtained by introducing an exchange and a correlation correction. Also a gradient correction has been introduced to correct for the use of a free-electron gas kinetic energy in the original theory [203, 204]. 

---