Full development sequential

A more systematic approach was developed by Romagnoli and Stephanopoulos (1981) and Romagnoli (1983) to analyze a set of measurement data in the presence of gross errors. The method is based on the idea of exploiting the sequential processing of the information (constraints and measurements), thus allowing the computations to be done in a recursive way without solving the full-scale reconciliation problem. 

Sequential combinations complete chemotherapy first and then follow it with radiation therapy. The advantages of this schedule are decreased toxicity and increased ability to deliver full doses of chemotherapy. The disadvantage is that there is an increased chance of developing therapy-resistant tumors (36). 

The advantage of the swelling method is that it is not limited by the crosslinking reactions of each phase so any interference from these will be limited. A good representative example is the synthesis developed by Hamurcu and Baysal [75]. They synthesized a bimodal PDMS (15 000 gmoD1)/ PDMS (75 000 g mol ) IPN with the same condensation curing system. First, the 75 000 g mol 1 PDMS network was formed from the corresponding a, tw-dihydroxypolydimethylsiloxane and tetraethylorthosilicate catalyzed by stannous 2-ethylhexanoate. It was then swollen in a 15 000 g mol 1 a,a>-dihydroxy-poly(dimethylsiloxane) monomer. The second monomer was then crosslinked via the same condensation cure. The sequential full IPN structure... 

There is a lack of consensus on the best re-treatment protocol for patients who develop hepatotoxicity during treatment with standard antituberculosis agents. Investigators from Turkey have reported a high risk of recurrence of hepatitis (in six of 25 patients) on re-introduction of all drugs in full doses after recovery from hepatitis (31). This risk was less when rifampicin and isonia-zid were re-introduced sequentially in increasing doses and when pyrazinamide was replaced by streptomycin. 

Since this paper will be restricted to sequential IPN s based on cross-poly butadiene-inter-cross-polystyrene. PB/PS, it is valuable to examine the range of possible compositions, see Figure 2 ( ). The PB/PS IPN polymer pair models high-impact polystyrene, and in fact, many of the combinations made are actually more impact resistant than the commercial materials. In general, with the addition of crosslinks, especially in network I, the phase domains become smaller. The impact resistance of high-impact polystyrene, upper left, is about 80 J/ra. In the same experiment, the semi-I IPN, middle left is about 160 J/m, and the full IPN, lower left, is about 265 J/m (g). Since the commercial material had perhaps dozens of man-years of development, and the IPN composition was made simply for doctoral research with substantially no optimization, it was obvious that these materials warranted further study. 

---