Free radical polymerization advantages

Calcium Chelates (Salicylates). Several successhil dental cements which use the formation of a calcium chelate system (96) were developed based on the reaction of calcium hydroxide [1305-62-0] and various phenohc esters of sahcyhc acid [69-72-7]. The calcium sahcylate [824-35-1] system offers certain advantages over the more widely used zinc oxide—eugenol system. These products are completely bland, antibacterial (97), facihtate the formation of reparative dentin, and do not retard the free-radical polymerization reaction of acryhc monomer systems. The principal deficiencies of this type of cement are its relatively high solubihty, relatively low strength, and low modulus. Less soluble and higher strength calcium-based cements based on dimer and trimer acid have been reported (82). 

Continuous-flow stirred tank reactors are widely used for free-radical polymerizations. They have two main advantages the solvent or monomer can be boiled to remove the heat of polymerization, and fairly narrow molecular weight and copolymer composition distributions can be achieved. Stirred tanks or... 

Ring-opening polymerization of 2-methylene-l,3-dioxepane (Fig. 6) represents the single example of a free radical polymerization route to PCL (51). Initiation with AIBN at SO C afforded PCL with a of 42,000 in 59% yield. While this monomer is not commercially available, the advantage of this method is that it may be used to obtain otherwise inaccessible copolymers. As an example, copolymerization with vinyl monomers has afforded copolymers of e-caprolactone with styrene, 4-vinylanisole, methyl methacrylate, and vinyl acetate. 

In addition, Stansbury Brauer (1985), taking advantage of the fact that vanillates do not inhibit free-radical polymerization, incorporated... 

PVA/acrylamide blend membranes prepared on cheese cloth support by y-irradiation induced free radical polymerization can be used for urease entrapment. The enzyme urease is entrapped in the membrane during polymerization process and using glutaraldehyde as cross-linking agent. The main advantage of this blend to this process is that it can be reused a number of times without significant loss of urease activity [292],... 

Various a-methylenemacrolides were enzymatically polymerized to polyesters having polymerizable methacrylic methylene groups in the main chain (Fig. 3, left). The free-radical polymerization of these materials produced crosslinked polymer gels [10, 12]. A different chemoenzymatic approach to crosslinked polymers was recently introduced by van der Meulen et al. for novel biomedical materials [11]. Unsaturated macrolactones like globalide and ambrettolide were polymerized by enzymatic ROP. The clear advantage of the enzymatic process is that polymerizations of macrolactones occur very fast as compared to the chemically catalyzed reactions [13]. Thermal crosslinking of the unsaturated polymers in the melt yielded insoluble and fully amorphous materials (Fig. 3, right). 

Apart from ATRP, the concept of dual initiation was also applied to other (controlled) polymerization techniques. Nitroxide-mediated living free radical polymerization (LFRP) is one example reported by van As et al. and has the advantage that no further metal catalyst is required [43], Employing initiator NMP-1, a PCL macroinitiator was obtained and subsequent polymerization of styrene produced a block copolymer (Scheme 4). With this system, it was for the first time possible to successfully conduct a one-pot chemoenzymatic cascade polymerization from a mixture containing NMP-1, CL, and styrene. Since the activation temperature of NMP is around 100 °C, no radical polymerization will occur at the reaction temperature of the enzymatic ROP. The two reactions could thus be thermally separated by first carrying out the enzymatic polymerization at low temperature and then raising the temperature to around 100 °C to initiate the NMP. Moreover, it was shown that this approach is compatible with the stereoselective polymerization of 4-MeCL for the synthesis of chiral block copolymers. 

El-Aasser and coworkers [191-193] have used the miniemulsification process to create water dispersions of preformed polymers. In this technique, a polymer is dissolved in a volatile organic solvent. The polymer-solvent solution is then miniemulsified and the solvent is evaporated off. This leaves a submicron water dispersion of the polymer. This technology has some distinct advantages. First, it can be applied to any polymer that is insoluble in water, but soluble in an organic solvent. Second, the polymerization need not be via free radical polymerization, since it is accomplished previous to miniemulsification. For this reason, polymerizations that are not water-tolerant may be used to form the polymer. This technique has been applied to a number of commercial apphcations. 

The discussion of free-radical polymerizations in Chapters 6 and 7 focused primarily on homogeneous reaction systems, in which monomer, polymer, and any solvent were all miscible. This conventional presentation makes it much easier to grasp the fundamentals of free-radical polymerizations. In fact, however, many large-scale processes are carried out in heterogeneous systems, because these offer advantages over alternative procedures. Their overall importance is such as to justify this chapter describing the effects of process conditions on polymer properties. 

Polymers can be prepared by many different processes. Free radical polymerization can be accomplished in bulk, suspension, solution, or emulsion. Ionic and other nonradical polymerizations are usually produced in solution polymerizations. Each technique has characteristic advantages and disadvantages. 

---