Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Fracture toughness versus Charpy impact energy

6 Fracture toughness versus Charpy impact energy [Pg.321]

Another correlation in Sokolov and Nanstad (1999) between CVN transition temperature shifts and yield strength increases shows the relationship  [Pg.321]

14 Comparisons of irradiation-induced shifts of fracture toughness and CVN energy for western-type RPV (a) weld metals and (b) base metals. As shown, the A74U and ATo (= T m) are essentially 1 1 for weld metals, but ATg is 1.16 x ATnj for base metals (Sokolov and Nanstad, 1999). [Pg.322]

The coefficient of 0.70 is the same as the value of 0.70 published in Odette et al. (1985) for AT41J and Actys- Moreover, Nanstad and Berggren (1993) published similar results specifically for low upper-shelf welds with coefficients ranging from 0.4-0.9 for seven different welds and an average value of 0.65, very close to the 0.70 value shown in Eq. 10.15. All such [Pg.322]

15 Comparison of CVN 41J transition temperature and the fracture toughness reference temperature To = Too) for the same western-type RPV materiais as in Fig. 10.14 (Sokoiov and Nanstad, 1999). [Pg.323]




SEARCH



Charpy

Energy Charpy impact

Impact energy

Impact fracture

Impact fracture toughness

Tough

Tough fracture

Toughness impact

© 2024 chempedia.info