Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Fourth Service Command

In contrast to ASF activity at the depots, whose revised organizational structures were looked upon approvingly by key personnel in the CWS, the ASF decision to put Camp Sibert under the jurisdiction of the commanding general of the Fourth Service Command, was not viewed with favor by the Chief, CWS. General Somervell, nevertheless, stood by the ASF directive to make Sibert a Class I activity of the Fourth Service Command, as noted above. General Porter undoubtedly had that situation in mind when in September 1944 he set up the San Jose Project Division in his office to supervise all activities of the Panama installation. Porter was taking a precaution to insure that all responsibility for San Jose would remain under CWS control. [Pg.141]

After Gimp Sibert had been designated as a Class I activity of the Fourth Service Command in May 1943, CWS activities at the camp were limited to the promulgation of training doctrine, the establishment of student quotas, and the preparation of training programs. While this system was workable, it appears likely that had gas warfare materialized CWS control of the installation would have become necessary. [Pg.287]


See other pages where Fourth Service Command is mentioned: [Pg.128]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.310]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.310]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.514]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.186]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.289 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info