Forces also dipolar

The three intermolecular forces are dipolar attractions, van der Waals forces (also called London forces), and hydrogen bonding. The effects of dipoles (Section 13.5) are considered first, followed by discussions of van der Waals forces and hydrogen bonding. 

There are many parameters that have been used to describe the attractive forces (dispersive, dipolar and hydrogen bonding) present within a solvent or liquid. However, Hildebrand s solubility parameter (8) is probably the most commonly used. In general, two liquids are miscible if the difference in 8 is less than 3.4 units. Also, if a solid e.g. a polymer) has a 8 similar to the solvent, it will dissolve. However, there are exceptions to this rule especially with polar solvents and solutes. Therefore, it is often worth testing solubility or solvent miscibility on a small scale even if data are available. 

Dispersion Forces The dipolar interaction forces between any two bodies of finite mass, including the Keesom forces of orientation among dipoles, Debye induction forces, and London forces between two induced dipoles. Also referred to as Lifshitz—van der Waals forces. 

The added stability of secondary bonding in the crystallite is reflected in the increase in in the series 2(i) to 2(iii), as we move from simply van der Waals forces to dipolar and hydrogen-bond interactions. The hydrogen bonding is also sufficient to raise the of 2(iii) above that of 3(i) in spite of the extra flexible sequence present in the 2(iii) chain. 

The relatively high melting point indicates that it is unlikely that weak dispersion forces are the predominant forces present Dipolar forces are also quite weak and therefore are also unlikely to be the forces present. 

The structure formation in an ER fluid was simulated [99]. The characteristic parameter is the ratio of the Brownian force to the dipolar force. Over a wide range of this ratio there is rapid chain formation followed by aggregation of chains into thick columns with a body-centered tetragonal structure observed. Above a threshold of the intensity of an external ahgn-ing field, condensation of the particles happens [100]. This effect has also been studied for MR fluids [101]. The rheological behavior of ER fluids [102] depends on the structure formed chainlike, shear-string, or liquid. Coexistence in dipolar fluids in a field [103], for a Stockmayer fluid in an applied field [104], and the structure of soft-sphere dipolar fluids were investigated [105], and ferroelectric phases were found [106]. An island of vapor-liquid coexistence was found for dipolar hard spherocylinders [107]. It exists between a phase where the particles form chains of dipoles in a nose-to-tail... 

More realistic treatment of the electrostatic interactions of the solvent can be made. The dipolar hard-sphere model is a simple representation of the polar nature of the solvent and has been adopted in studies of bulk electrolyte and electrolyte interfaces [35-39], Recently, it was found that this model gives rise to phase behavior that does not exist in experiments [40,41] and that the Stockmeyer potential [41,42] with soft cores should be better to avoid artifacts. Representation of higher-order multipoles are given in several popular models of water, namely, the simple point charge (SPC) model [43] and its extension (SPC/E) [44], the transferable interaction potential (T1PS)[45], and other central force models [46-48], Models have also been proposed to treat the polarizability of water [49],... 

---