Fluid-solid interfaces shear rate

It is well known that the continuum theory in the Navier-Stokes equations only validates when the mean free path of the molecules is smaller than the characteristic length scale of the gas flow. Otherwise, the fluid will no longer be in thermodynamic equilibrium and the linear relationship between the shear stress and rate of shear strain cannot be applied. The commonly used no-slip boundary condition at the fluid-solid interface is not fully valid, and a slip length has to be introduced. 

Indeed, the shear stress at the solid surface is txz=T (S 8z)z=q (where T (, is the melt viscosity and (8USz)z=0 the shear rate at the interface). If there is a finite slip velocity Vs at the interface, the shear stress at the solid surface can also be evaluated as txz=P Fs, where 3 is the friction coefficient between the fluid molecules in contact with the surface and the solid surface [139]. Introducing the extrapolation length b of the velocity profile to zero (b=Vs/(8vy8z)z=0, see Fig. 18), one obtains (3=r bA). Thus, any determination of b will yield (3, the friction coefficient between the surface and the fluid. This friction coefficient is a crucial characteristics of the interface it is obviously directly related to the molecular interactions between the fluid and the solid surface, and it connects these interactions at the molecular level to the rheological properties of the system. 

Assuming that there is no slip at the solid/liquid interfaces, the velocity of movement, v, of an clement of fluid relative to the lower plate increases linearly from zero at z = 0 to V at z-= h, as shown in Figure 8.1(b). The ratio V/h is called the shear rate, or the rate of shear strain, and is denoted by D. The force needed to maintain the steady motion is proportional to the area, A, of the plates (ignoring edge effects), and the ratio F/A is called the shear... 

The double integral represents the nonzero terms of the dissipation rate tensor as adapted by Middleman [61] and Bernhardt and McKelvey for adiabatic extrusion [62]. The nontensorial approach was adopted by Tadmor and Klein in their classical text on extrusion [9]. In essence these are the nonzero terms of the dissipation rate tensor when it is applied to the boundary of the fluid at the solid-fluid interface. In the following development this historic analysis was adopted for energy dissipation for a rotating screw. In this case the velocities Ui are evaluated at the screw surface s and calculated in relation to screw rotation theory. The work in the flight clearance was previously described in the literature [9]. The shear... 

Unlike creeping flow about a solid sphere, the r9 component of the rate-of-strain tensor vanishes at the gas-liquid interface, as expected for zero shear, but the simple velocity gradient (dvg/dr)r R is not zero. The fluid dynamics boundary conditions require that [(Sy/dt)rg]r=R = 0- The leading term in the polynomial expansion for vg, given by (11-126), is most important for flow around a bubble, but this term vanishes for a no-slip interface when the solid sphere is stationary. For creeping flow around a gas bubble, the tangential velocity component within the mass transfer boundary layer is approximated as... 

Conflicting results on tlie effect of flow rate or fluid velocity on scale deposition have been reported by Andritsos and Karabelas [21]. They showed that the flow rate either increased or decreased the mass of scale deposited over a certain period of time. Clearly, this is due to the nature of the solid-fluid interface layer and the shear sti ess induced to the scale by the flow. These two incompatible forces are further complicated by other parameters such as the presence of additives, which may exert a significant effect on the nature of the interface layer as well as on the characteristics of the scale deposited [26]. Fluid velocity also affects the orientation of the growing scale or crystals [2, 27, 28]. The tendency is that the scale to orient to the direction of the fluid flow [2]. A rather recent study on gypsum and calcium carbonate scaling of membrane desalination by He and co-workers [29] shows that a faster flow rate increases more deposition of gypsum scale. 

---