First-generation methods

As described in chapter 4, virtually all the known mediods of asymmetric synthesis are ultimately based on die pool of naturally 

---

The auxiliary-controlled reaction (Fig. 1-30, 2) is referred to as the second generation of asymmetric synthesis. This approach is similar to the first-generation method in which the asymmetric control is achieved intramolecu-larly by a chiral group in the substrate. The difference is that the directing... 

Since first generation methods for intact PTH measure N-terminal-truncated PTH, they overestimate the concentration of biologically intact hormone. The degree of overestimation will be method-dependent, but intact PTH is 50% higher on average than PTIT(l-84) in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism or end-stage renal disease. ... 

The first generation methods that were proposed involved interface reconstruction and approximation of the singular interfacial term from the 2D interface properties. These models thus rely on a proper numerical procedure to locate the interface within the mesh based on the volume fraction field. The local curvature may then be calculated in each surface grid cell. 

An important development in recent years has been the introduction of more sophisticated methods which, on the face of it, combine elements of the first-, second-, third- and fourth-generation methods described in the last section. Thus we can, for example, react a chiral substrate with a chiral reagent. This approach, pioneered by Masamune,Pi is described as multiple asymmetric induction and is particularly valuable in reactions where two new stereogenic units are formed simultaneously. In the example which follows, the aldol reaction between chiral aldehyde (51) and a boron enolate to give (53) and (54) is considered. As it stands this is a first-generation method since the chiral substrate (51) reacts with the achiral enolate to give... 

The bulk of this chapter is concerned with second-generation methods, subdivided according to whether the reactant bearing the chiral auxiliary reacts as a nucleophile, an electrophile, or neither. We begin, however, by considering a few examples of non-stereodifferentiating and first-generation methods. 

The first-generation method DFT-Dl was developed by Grimme to overcome the well-known deficiencies of GGA and hybrid functionals in the treatment of dispersion interactions [38] this was followed by the more general DFT-D2 [39]. 

To obtain this matrix by the multivariate method, we first generate two absorptivity vectors ap and a2j from a known concentration matrix in parts per million... 

Three generations of latices as characterized by the type of surfactant used in manufacture have been defined (53). The first generation includes latices made with conventional (/) anionic surfactants like fatty acid soaps, alkyl carboxylates, alkyl sulfates, and alkyl sulfonates (54) (2) nonionic surfactants like poly(ethylene oxide) or poly(vinyl alcohol) used to improve freeze—thaw and shear stabiUty and (J) cationic surfactants like amines, nitriles, and other nitrogen bases, rarely used because of incompatibiUty problems. Portiand cement latex modifiers are one example where cationic surfactants are used. Anionic surfactants yield smaller particles than nonionic surfactants (55). Often a combination of anionic surfactants or anionic and nonionic surfactants are used to provide improved stabiUty. The stabilizing abiUty of anionic fatty acid soaps diminishes at lower pH as the soaps revert to their acids. First-generation latices also suffer from the presence of soap on the polymer particles at the end of the polymerization. Steam and vacuum stripping methods are often used to remove the soap and unreacted monomer from the final product (56). 

This technique is based in the fact that when cellulose is oxidized by ceric salts such as ceric ammonium nitrate Ce(NH4)2(N03)6 free radicals capable of initiating vinyl polymerization are formed on the cellulose. However, the possibility remains that the radical formed is an oxygen radical or that the radical is formed on the C-2 or C-3 instead of the C-6 carbon atom. Another mechanism, proposed by Livshits and coworkers [13], involves the oxidation of the glycolic portion of the an-hydroglucose unit. Several workers [14,15], however, have found evidence for the formation of some homopolymer. In the ceric ion method free radicals are first generated and are then capable of initiating the grafting process [16-18]. 

In the earliest SFG experiments [Tadjeddine, 2000 Guyot-Sionnest et al., 1987 Hunt et al., 1987 Zhu et al., 1987], a first-generation data acquisition method was used, and, because of the limited signal-to-noise ratios, IR attenuation by the electrolyte solution was a substantial handicap. So, in earlier SFG studies, as in IRAS studies, measurements were performed with the electrode pressed directly against the optical window [Baldelli et al., 1999 Dederichs et al., 2000]. With the in-contact geometry, the electrolyte was a thin film of uncertain and variable depth, probably of the order of 1 p.m. However, the thin nonuniform electrolyte layers can strongly distort the potential/coverage relationship and hinder the ability to study fast kinetics. 

In 1968 Wilkinson discovered that phosphine-modified rhodium complexes display a significantly higher activity and chemoselectivity compared to the first generation cobalt catalyst [29]. Since this time ligand modification of the rhodium catalyst system has been the method of choice in order to influence catalyst activity and selectivity [10]. 

---