Filter gain

In a measurement of air pollution, air was drawn through a filter at the rate of 26.2 liters per minute for 48.0 hours. The filter gained 0.0241 grams in mass because of entrapped solid particles. Express the concentration of solid contaminants in the air in units of micrograms per cubic meter. 

Filter gain matrix with online measurements... 

The LC filter gain decreases at the rate of —2 at high frequencies. The phase also decreases providing a total phase shift of 180°. So we say we have a double-pole at the break frequency 2jt,v/(LC). 

Similarly, the denominator will have Mvalues of Z that make it zero, and these values cause the filter gain to be infinite at those values. These M values are called poles of the filter (like tent poles sticking up in the transfer function, with infinite height where the denominator is zero). Poles are important because they can model resonances in physical systems (weil see that in the next chapter). Zeroes model signal cancellations, as in the destructive interference discussed in Chapter 2. 

Figure 3.14 shows some superimposed frequency responses of a Biquad with g set to 0.1 set to 0.99 and 0.97 the zeroes set at special locations (+/-1 on the real axis) and Freq swept from 0 to 4000 Hz in 500 Hz steps (sampling rate is 8000 Hz). Locating the zeroes at those locations of frequency = 0 and frequency = SRATE/2 helps to keep the total filter gain nearly constant, independent of the frequency of the resonator. 

Correction The correction calculates the filter gain (Kjt), which corrects the prediction made by the model ... 

Where, K is the filter gain. Meanwhile, the critical frequency can be described as /c = III RC = fJ2mn (11). So, theof the low-pass filter module can be controlled by parameters X and m. 

Figure 1 shows a block diagram for the perturbed state of a robot, e, subject to both the process noise w and measurement noise y. The actually measured perturbed state is denoted as z. The Kalman filter is the best linear estimator in the sense that it produces unbiased, minimum variance estimates (Kalman and Bucy, 1961 Brown, 1983). Let (t) be the estimated perturbed state and 6eg(t) be the residual which is the difference between the true measured perturbed state, z(t), and the estimated perturbed state based on 6a (t), here denoted as (t). It has already been shown (Lewis, 1986) that Cx satisfies a differential equation which can be schematically represented by the block diagram shown in Fig. 2 where K(t) is a Kalman filter gain. K(t) is to be calculated according to the equation... 

---