Felkin-type additions

Addition of the lithium enolate of j5-(dimethylamino)propionate (597), an acrylate a-anion equivalent, to 658 leads ultimately to the formation of a-methylene-j -hydroxy-y-alkoxy esters 671 and 672 in a ratio of 83 17 [100]. The predominant formation of the anti isomer 671 is a direct result of Felkin-type addition. Ester 671 is a potentially useful synthon for the synthesis of long-chain antibiotics such as conocandin (596). 

However, even more gratifying was the observation that the simple S and R sugar aldehydes, gave single epimers at C7 of 42 and 43, respectively. These glyceraldehyde derivatives have been foimd to imdergo Felkin-type additions (ref 40), and the results in Scheme 8 show that the elements of stereocontrol in each of... 

Excellent diastereoselectivity is observed for 8-oxy allylic acetates. The stereoselectivity is attributed to a Felkin-type TS with addition anti to the oxy substituent. 

TS, which is usually based on the chair (Zimmerman-Traxler) model. This pattern is particularly prevalent for the allylic borane reagents, where the Lewis acidity of boron promotes a tight cyclic TS, but at the same time limits the possibility of additional chelation. The dominant factors in these cases are the E- or Z-configuration of the allylic reagent and the conformational preferences of the reacting aldehyde (e.g., a Felkin-type preference.)... 

A variety of Lewis acids have been used to promote the addition of an allylsilane or allylstannane to an aldehyde (or ketone or imine). The Lewis acid BF3-OEt2 is effective and promotes Cram (Felkin-Anh)-type addition (see Section 1.1.5.1). However, Lewis acids such as TiCU, SnCU or MgBr2 can co-ordinate to a neighbouring (normally a-) heteroatom and promote chelation-controlled addition. For example, allylation of the aldehyde 161 gave either the Cram-type product or the chelation-controlled product depending upon the nature of the Lewis acid (1.153). 

I-Oialkoxy carbonyl compounds are a special class of chiral alkoxy carbonyl compounds because they combine the structural features, and, therefore, also the stereochemical behavior, of 7-alkoxy and /i-alkoxy carbonyl compounds. Prediction of the stereochemical outcome of nucleophilic additions to these substrates is very difficult and often impossible. As exemplified with isopropylidene glyceraldehyde (Table 15), one of the most widely investigated a,/J-di-alkoxy carbonyl compoundsI0S, the predominant formation of the syn-diastereomer 2 may be attributed to the formation of the a-chelate 1 A. The opposite stereochemistry can be rationalized by assuming the Felkin-Anh-type transition state IB. Formation of the /(-chelate 1C, which stabilizes the Felkin-Anh transition state, also leads to the predominant formation of the atm -diastereomeric reaction product. 

The addition of lithium enolates to 2-alkoxyaldehydes occurs either in a completely non-stereoselective manner, or with moderate selectivity in favor of the product predicted by the Cram-Felkin-Anh model28 ( nonchelation control 3, see reference 28 for a survey of this type of addition to racemic aldehydes). Thus, a 1 1 mixture of the diastereomeric adducts results from the reaction of lithiated tert-butyl acetate and 2-benzyloxypropanal4,28. 

Addition of (TMS)3SiH to a-chiral ( )-alkene 7 was found to take place with a complete Michael-type regioselectivity (Reaction 5.8) [26]. A complete syn stereoselectivity was observed for R = Me, and it was rationalized in terms of Felkin-Ahn transition state 8, which favours the syn product similar to nucleophilic addition. 

As a Stereochemical Prohe in Nucleophilic Additions. Historically, the more synthetically available enantiomer, (4R)-2,2-dimethyl-l,3-dioxolane-4-carhoxaldehyde, has been the compound of choice to probe stereochemistry in nucleophilic additions. Nevertheless, several studies have employed the (45)-aldeh-yde as a substrate. In analogy to its enantiomer, the reagent exhibits a moderate si enantiofacial preference for the addition of nucleophiles at the carbonyl, affording anti products. This preference for addition is predicted by Felkin-Ahn transition-state analysis, and stands in contrast to that predicted by the Cram chelate model. Thus addition of the lithium (Z)-enolate shown (eq 1) to the reagent affords an 81 19 ratio of products with the 3,4-anti relationship predominating as a result of preferential si-face addition, while the 2,3-syn relationship in each of the diastere-omers is ascribed to a Zimmerman-Traxler-type chair transition state in the aldol reaction. ... 

The stereoselectivity of the aldol additions shown in Schemes 5.25 and 5.26 are obviously the result of a complex series of factors, among which are the Felkin-Anh preference dictated by the a-substituent on the aldehyde, the proximal stereocenters on the enolate, etc. Additionally, the more remote stereocenters, such as at the p-position of the aldehyde, may influence the selectivity of these types of reactions. Evans has begun an investigation into some of the more subtle effects on crossed aldol selectivity, such as protecting groups at a remote site on the enolate [131], and of P-substituents on the aldehyde component [132], and also of matched and mismatched stereocenters at the a and P positions of an aldehyde (double asymmetric induction) [133]. Further, the effect of chiral enolates adding to a,P-disubstituted aldehydes has been evaluated [134]. The latter turns out to be a case of triple asymmetric induction, with three possible outcomes fully matched, partially matched, and one fully mismatched trio. 

In reactions of a-methyl chiral aldehydes with (.. -enolates and Type (2)-crotylmetal reagents like 3, the anti-Felkin addition product is favored due to unfavorable syn-pentane interactions in the Felkin transition state. Thus, in the matched reaction, the (S,5)-3 reagent reacts with aldehyde 40a to provide the anh, syn-dipropionate 45 with 95 5 selectivity. The stereochemical outcome of the reaction can be rationalized by anti-Felkin transition state H, where the nucleophile must approach near the methyl substituent. The mismatched reaction between aldehyde 40b and (R,R)-3 provides a mixture of dipropionates where the syn,syn-dipropionate 46 is only modestly favored (64 36 = sum of all other diastereomers). Transition state I, that rationalizes the formation of the major product, is less favorable as the nucleophile must approach the carbonyl carbon past the larger R substituent. 

Other important molecules that are useful intermediates in the synthesis of natural products are chiral diols. anli-l,2-Diols of type 30 were obtained in good yields (75-85%) and moderate to good diastereoselectivity (76-96% de) by a nickel-catalyzed three-component addition of a-silyloxy aldehydes 27, alkynyl silanes 28a, and reduction with triisopropyl silane (29a) (Scheme 11.11) [31]. The diastereoselectivity of this process could be explained by the Felkin model. Alternatively, a chiral alkynyl derivative can control the outcome of the reaction. Thus, the coupling of optically active, oxazolidinone-derived ynamides, aldehydes, and silane as reducing agent led to the formation of y-siloxyenamide derivatives with diastereoselectivities up to 99% [32]. 

The stereochemical outcome in these additions can be understood by invoking Cram chelate [48] and Felkin-Anh-type [49] transition states for N-benzyl and N-sulfonyl aldimines, respectively (Figure 11.2 see also Chapter 2). The consequences of these results and their applications are noteworthy. Thus, selection of the appropriate N-protecting group can lead to preferential formation of either syn or anti 1,2-diamines at will [46]. 

---