Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Favorable Good Interactions

Now, examine the orbital on cyclohexanone lithium enolate most able to donate electrons. This is the highest-occupied molecular orbital (HOMO). Identify where the best HOMO-electrophile overlap can occur. Is this also the most electron-rich site An electrophile will choose the best HOMO overlap site if it is not strongly affected by electrostatic effects, and if it contains a good electron-acceptor orbital (this is the lowest-unoccupied molecular orbital or LUMO). Examine the LUMO of methyl iodide and trimethylsilyl chloride. Is backside overlap likely to be successful for each The LUMO energies of methyl iodide and trimethylsilyl chloride are 0.11 and 0.21 au, respectively. Assuming that the lower the LUMO energy the more effective the interaction, which reaction, methylation or silylation, appears to be guided by favorable orbital interactions Explain. [Pg.168]

The expansion of a polymer coil is determined by its interaction with the solvent. The more favorable the interaction between the polymer segments and the solvent molecules (good solvent), the better the polymer dissolves and the more the coil expands. [Pg.101]

Hard and soft can be explained in terms of the HOMO and LUMO energies and their separation (Fig. 2.13). Soft species have high-energy HOMOs and a small energy separation between the HOMO and LUMO. The soft-soft interaction, a covalent bond, is favored by a good interaction between the HOMO of the base and the LUMO of the acid. The closer in energy these two orbitals are, the larger the interaction, and the more stable the covalent bond formed is. [Pg.42]

Very recently, cerium(IV)-mediated C-C bond formations were applied for the first time in carbohydrate chemistry [9]. Again, radicals are generated from malo-nates la at low temperatures, and even sensitive glycals 16 are stable under such conditions. The regioselectivity of the additions is controlled by favorable orbital interactions and the adduct radicals are oxidized to cations, which are trapped by the solvent or CAN to afford the carbohydrate C-analogs 17 in good yields (Scheme... [Pg.221]

Sulfidation of the brass surface is not due to its interaction with elemental sulfur, but it is the result of the interaction between the brass surface and accelerator-sulfur reaction products, which can be represented by the general structure, Ac-S -Ac and Ac-Sy-H, where Ac is an accelerator-derived moiety (e.g., benzothiazolyl group). The value of the subscript, y, increases with the ratio of the concentration of sulfur to the concentration of accelerator used in the curing system. Generally, high sulfur levels and high ratios of sulfur concentration to accelerator concentration favor good rubber-to-brass adhesion. [Pg.358]

The other major energetic contributions to macromolecular solvation are from the VDW interactions and the hydrophobic effect. The former favors good solvent packing around a molecule, and will tend to oppose the effect of intramolecular VDW interactions. The hydrophobic effect drives nonpolar groups away from the solvent. These two interactions are combined in continuum solvent models into a surface free energy description, where the exposure of a certain solvent accessible area A of a molecule requires an energy = yA. The... [Pg.573]

A good solvent is the technical as well as descriptive term used to identify a solvent which tends to increase coil dimensions. Since this is a consequence of thermodynamically favorable polymer-solvent interactions, good solvents also dissolve polymers more readily in the first place. [Pg.60]

In pyridine, as in 2-propanol, the selectivity of reduction favors the A" -3-ketone over the 17- and 20-ketones.Kupfer suggests that resonance interactions between the double bond and the 3-ketone are smaller in pyridine and in 2-propanol than in methanol. However, by slow addition (1 hour) of one equivalent of NaBH4 in pyridine to a solution of androst-4-ene-3,17-dione i n methanol, testosterone has been obtained in good yield (72 %). Similarly,... [Pg.83]


See other pages where Favorable Good Interactions is mentioned: [Pg.19]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.430]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.511]    [Pg.570]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.1035]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.2048]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.519]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.652]    [Pg.800]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.412]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.2063]    [Pg.31]   


SEARCH



Favorable interactions

Favored

© 2024 chempedia.info