Experimental limited viscosity number

The limiting viscosity number for the 80 min. pattern with 50 zones is 2.50 dL/g as compared to an experimental value of 2.45 dL/g. The experimental limiting viscosity number was determined from the data of Table II. 

The experimental determination of polymer intrinsic viscosity is done through the measurement of polymer solution viscosity. The connotation of intrinsic viscosity [hi/ however, is very different from the usual sense of fluid viscosity. Intrinsic viscosity, or sometimes called the limiting viscosity number, carries a far more reaching significance of providing the size and MW information of the polymer molecule. Unlike the fluid viscosity, vdiich is commonly reported in the poise or centipoise units, the [h] value is reported in the dimension of inverse concentration xinits of dl/g, for exanple. The value of [hi for a linear polymer in a specific solvent is related to the polymer molecular weight (M) through the Mark-Houwink equation ... 

Unfortunately these experimental data show large variations, if limiting viscosity numbers determined by different investigators on the same polymer are compared. This... 

My is derived from solution viscosity measurements through the Mark-Houwiiik equation [ii] = K My, where [n] is the limiting viscosity number and K and I are constants which depend on the polymer, solvent, and experimental conditions, but not on M (p. 96). 

The fluid resistance experienced by a macromolecular solute moving in dilute solution depends on the shape and size of the molecule. A number of physical quantities have been introduced to express this. Typical ones are intrinsic viscosity [ry], limiting sedimentation coefficient s0, and limiting diffusion coefficient D0. The first is related to the rotation of the solute, while the last two are concerned with the translational motion of the solute. A wealth of theoretical and experimental information about these hydrodynamic quantities is already available for randomly coiled chains (40, 60). However, the corresponding information on non-randomly coiled polymers is as yet rather limited in number and in variety. 

The Stokes-Einstein equation predicts that DfxITa is independent of the solvent however, for real solutions, it has long been known that the product of limiting interdiffusion coefficient for solutes and the solvent viscosity decreases with increasing solute molar volume [401]. Based upon a large number of experimental results, Wilke and Chang [437] proposed a semiempirical equation,... 

The number of PPE particles dispersed in the SAN matrix, i.e., the potential nucleation density for foam cells, is a result of the competing mechanisms of dispersion and coalescence. Dispersion dominates only at rather small contents of the dispersed blend phase, up to the so-called percolation limit which again depends on the particular blend system. The size of the dispersed phase is controlled by the processing history and physical characteristics of the two blend phases, such as the viscosity ratio, the interfacial tension and the viscoelastic behavior. While a continuous increase in nucleation density with PPE content is found below the percolation limit, the phase size and in turn the nucleation density reduces again at elevated contents. Experimentally, it was found that the particle size of immiscible blends, d, follows the relation d --6 I Cdispersed phase and C is a material constant depending on the blend system. Subsequently, the theoretical nucleation density, N , is given by... 

---