Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Exitance graphs

Using Lemma 4.1 and the "duality principle" (i.e. that domination and back domination can be exchanged by reversing the directions of all the arrows on a single entry single exit graph) we have the following lemma. [Pg.121]

To reverse Lemma 4.10, we need a few additional. implications of our definitions. First, we have a result true for any single entry single exit graph G. ... [Pg.125]

LEMMA 4.11 Let G be a single entry single exit graph with entry e and exit... [Pg.125]

DEFINITION For nodes n and in in a single entry single exit graph, let... [Pg.126]

LEMMA. 4.13 Let P be a flow diagram whose graph S is a line-like single entry single exit graph with entry node e and exit node d, such that either d is labeled with a STOP statement or d has exactly one arc leading out of G. Then P is a well-structured graph. [Pg.127]

An opacity monitor is set so that the incident light is 100 units. Prepare a graph of the percentage of opacity versus the light flux leaving the plume (opacity, 0-100% exiting light flux, 0-100 units). [Pg.553]

It is seen that the two curves are quite different and, if the results are fitted to the HETP equation, only the data obtained by using the exit velocity gives correct and realistic values for the individual dispersion processes. This point is emphasized by the graphs shown in Figure 5 where the HETP curve obtained by using average velocity data are deconvoluted into the individual contributions from the different dispersion processes. [Pg.272]

For bundle entrance and exit losses, refer to copyrighted graph of Donohue. ... [Pg.142]

DEFINITION A single entry single exit subgraph of a graph G is a single entry subgraph G with a single exit node d such that ... [Pg.115]

The concept of "back dominates" is really the reverse or "dual" of the concept of "dominates" or "is an ancestor of" in the sense that in graph G with single entry e and single exit d, n hack dominates m if and only if m dominates... [Pg.121]

Finally the two compositions in (4) are graphically similar, and so we discuss only the first. Graph is formed by connecting a query node q a branch node - to two nodes, the entry node e of B and the NULL node p which is the exit for the exit node d of B is directly connected back to q. We can only... [Pg.124]

The table and the graph show that the exit point condition is satisfied when 7(0) - -46.515. [Pg.40]

Calculate the compositions of the exiting raffinate and extract streams. Replot (or trace) Fig. 9.1 without the tie lines (Fig. 9.3). On Fig. 9.3, plot the mean-concentration point M. Now from mass-balance considerations, the exit concentrations must lie on the two phase-boundary lines and on a straight line passing through the mean concentration point. We know we want the water phase to have an exit concentration of 3 wt % alcohol. Such a concentration corresponds to point Ln on the graph. At point LN. the ether concentration is seen to be 7.6 wt % (this can be found more accurately in the present case by numerical extrapolation of the water-phase data in Table 9.1). Therefore, the composition of the raffinate stream is 3% alcohol, 7.6% ether, and (by difference) 89.4% water. [Pg.386]

Equation 3.2.6 gives the concentration of water vapor in the inlet air as function of tjw, yiw, and Ahyw, where the subscript, w, means wet bulb. The equations are in functional notation to indicate that these data may be available in tables, graphs or equations. The wet-bulb temperature, tiw, will be discussed later. Equation 3.2.7 expresses the mole fraction of water vapor in the exit air in terms of the vapor pressure at saturation. The air leaving the tower is assumed to be 90% saturated, a value recommended by Walas [12]. [Pg.114]

Fifjure 6. Angular and kinetic energy distribution of the outgoing hydrogen atoms. Graphs a) and c) corresponds to the H + I exit channel, while b) and d) ndth the H + I channel. In the case a) and b) the dopant is placed in the second shell, while in the case c) and d) the dopant is on the surface, c) Simulation of the phorodissociation of the dopant on the surface (histogram) compared with a pick-up photodissociation experiment (line with error bars), f) Simulation of the photodissociation of the dopant in the sub-surface shell (histogram) compared with a pick-up photodissociation experiment (lino with error bars). [Pg.486]


See other pages where Exitance graphs is mentioned: [Pg.373]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.484]    [Pg.419]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.372]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.521]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.458]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.419]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.248]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.39 , Pg.40 , Pg.41 ]




SEARCH



Exitation

Exiting

Exits

© 2024 chempedia.info