Excited electron correlation methods

Linear Scaling Techniques Semi-Empirical Methods 3.9.1 Neglect of Diatomic Differential Overlap Approximation (NDDO) 3.9.2 Intermediate Neglect of Differential Overlap Approximation (INDO) 80 81 82 83 4.13 Locahzed Orbital Methods 4.14 Summary of Electron Correlation Methods 4.15 Excited States References 5 Basis Sets 144 144 147 148 150... 

Two relevant topics have been ignored completely in this short chapter the treatment of electron correlation with more sophisticated methods than DFT (that remains unsatisfactory from many points of view) and the related subject of excited states. Wave function-based methods for the calculation of electron correlation, like the perturbative Moller-Plesset (MP) expansion or the coupled cluster approximation, have registered an impressive advancement in the molecular context. The computational cost increases with the molecular size (as the fifth power in the most favorable cases), especially for molecules with low symmetry. That increase was the main disadvantage of these electron correlation methods, and it limited their application to tiny molecules. This scaling problem has been improved dramatically by modern reformulation of the theory by localized molecular orbitals, and now a much more favorable scaling is possible with the appropriate approximations. Linear scaling with such low prefactors has been achieved with MP schemes that the... 

The PCM model contains the largest variety of extensions for the calculation of the properties for the ground and excites states of molecular systems in solution [44 9] and these extensions have been accomplished at HF level and at various QM electron correlation methods [27, 50-57]. There are also version based on semi-empirical QM methods we quote here only those based on ZINDO [58]. 

Coupled cluster with singles and doubles excitations (CCSD) is a size-consistent post-HF electron correlation method. The wavefunction, Y, in coupled cluster theory is formulated in terms of a cluster (exponential) expansion including the single and double excitation operators 7i and %. The effect of triple excitations (T) is calculated with perturbation theory. 

Accuracy of Electron Correlation Methods for Actinide Excited States WFT and DFT Methods... 

Each of these tools has advantages and limitations. Ab initio methods involve intensive computation and therefore tend to be limited, for practical reasons of computer time, to smaller atoms, molecules, radicals, and ions. Their CPU time needs usually vary with basis set size (M) as at least M correlated methods require time proportional to at least M because they involve transformation of the atomic-orbital-based two-electron integrals to the molecular orbital basis. As computers continue to advance in power and memory size, and as theoretical methods and algorithms continue to improve, ab initio techniques will be applied to larger and more complex species. When dealing with systems in which qualitatively new electronic environments and/or new bonding types arise, or excited electronic states that are unusual, ab initio methods are essential. Semi-empirical or empirical methods would be of little use on systems whose electronic properties have not been included in the data base used to construct the parameters of such models. 

There are two types of Cl calculations implemented in Hyper-Chem — singly excited Cl and microstate CL The singly excited Cl which is available for both ab initio and semi-empirical calculations may be used to generate UV spectra and the microstate Cl available only for the semi-empirical methods in HyperChem is used to improve the wave function and energies including the electronic correlation. Only single point calculations can be performed in HyperChem using CL... 

HyperChem supports MP2 (second order Mpller-Plesset) correlation energy calculationsusing afe mi/io methods with anyavailable basis set. In order to save main memory and disk space, the HyperChem MP2 electron correlation calculation normally uses a so called frozen-core approximation, i.e. the inner shell (core) orbitals are omitted. A setting in CHEM.INI allows excitations from the core orbitals to be included if necessary (melted core). Only the single point calculation is available for this option. 

The parameterization of MNDO/AM1/PM3 is performed by adjusting the constants involved in the different methods so that the results of HF calculations fit experimental data as closely as possible. This is in a sense wrong. We know that the HF method cannot give the correct result, even in the limit of an infinite basis set and without approximations. The HF results lack electron correlation, as will be discussed in Chapter 4, but the experimental data of course include such effects. This may be viewed as an advantage, the electron correlation effects are implicitly taken into account in the parameterization, and we need not perform complicated calculations to improve deficiencies in fhe HF procedure. However, it becomes problematic when the HF wave function cannot describe the system even qualitatively correctly, as for example with biradicals and excited states. Additional flexibility can be introduced in the trial wave function by adding more Slater determinants, for example by means of a Cl procedure (see Chapter 4 for details). But electron cori elation is then taken into account twice, once in the parameterization at the HF level, and once explicitly by the Cl calculation. 

---