Exchange reactions experimental data

Yet the view that the rates of electron transfer in simple reactions are principally independent of the electrode metal (which for some time had been current in the electrochemical literature) cannot be maintained in this strict form. Many experimental data relating to the exchange current densities of reactions involving simple cations (such as Fe and Fe ) provide evidence that the electrode metal does exert a rather strong influence on the reaction rates. 

Following the Second World War, hydrogen very highly enriched in the isotope of mass 2 became available, and the mass spectrometer appeared as an analytical tool for the chemist the time was ripe for very detailed studies of catalyzed isotope exchange in hydrocarbons. The technique of continuously monitoring the reaction by means of a mass spectrometer linked directly to the reaction vessel has been used for many of the studies now to be described. The method by which the experimental data are treated is well known (84) it is reproduced briefly in the footnote (p. 136). 

The pressure P is contained in formula (62) not only in an explicit form but also in terms of the parameters e8 and e8+, as seen from (5), because s and e8+ are, generally speaking, functions of pressure. In our model, however, 8- and e8+ may be regarded as independent of P since the surface is supposed to be saturated with hydrogen and deuterium atoms (all the adsorption centers are assumed to be occupied). Thus, the hydrogen-deuterium exchange proves, in accordance with (63), to be a reaction of the first order with respect to hydrogen (deuterium), which is consistent with numerous experimental data (see Section III.A). 

The great majority of experimental data (see Section III.A) indicate that the hydrogen-deuterium exchange reaction belongs to the class of acceptor reactions (i.e., reactions that are accelerated by electrons and decelerated by holes). This means that the experimenter, as a rule, remains on the acceptor branch of the thick curve in Fig. 8a, on which the chemisorbed hydrogen and deuterium atoms act as donors. Here a donor impurity must enhance the catalytic activity, while an acceptor impurity must decrease it. This is what actually occurs, as we have already seen (see Section III.A). 

In the IPCM calculations, the molecule is contained inside a cavity within the polarizable continuum, the size of which is determined by a suitable computed isodensity surface. The size of this cavity corresponds to the molecular volume allowing a simple, yet effective evaluation of the molecular activation volume, which is not based on semi-empirical models, but also does not allow a direct comparison with experimental data as the second solvation sphere is almost completely absent. The volume difference between the precursor complex Be(H20)4(H20)]2+ and the transition structure [Be(H20)5]2+, viz., —4.5A3, represents the activation volume of the reaction. This value can be compared with the value of —6.1 A3 calculated for the corresponding water exchange reaction around Li+, for which we concluded the operation of a limiting associative mechanism. In the present case, both the nature of [Be(H20)5]2+ and the activation volume clearly indicate the operation of an associative interchange mechanism (156). 

In the following sections, we shall explore the applicability of such relationships to experimental data for some simple outer-sphere reactions involving transition-metal complexes. In keeping with the distinction between intrinsic and thermodynamic barriers [eq 7], exchange reactions will be considered first, followed by a comparison of driving force effects for related electrochemical and homogeneous reactions. 

Table 3.5 Comparison of simple additivity of oxide constituents (column II) and exchange method of Helgeson et al. (1978) (column I), as methods of estimating heat capacity for crystalline components. Experimental values are shown for comparison in column III. Lower part of table adopted exchange reactions (for which it is assumed that ACp reaction = 0). Data in J/(mole X K) (adapted from Helgeson et ah, 1978).

This order of reactivity was observ for add dedeuteration, but for acetylation, formylation, and chlorination it was slightly different thieno[3,2-h]thiophene (2) > thieno[2,3-h]thiophene (1) > thiophene thieno[3,4-6]thiophene (3) was not studied. A substantially greater discrepancy between theoretical and experimental data was observed for nucleophilic substitution from the data on base dedeuteration and competitive metalation reactions/ the order of decreasing reactivity was as follows thieno[2,3-h]thiophene (1) > thieno[3,2-h]thiophene (2) > thiophene. To a certain extent this may be explained by differences in the mechanism of metalation and deuterium exchange with a base. A discrepancy between calculation and experiment was also found for free-radical substitution. ... 

Since then, the group of structure-insensitive reactions has been very well documented by experimental data. This can be seen in several reviews (181, 223-225). It seems to be reliably established that reactions of simple molecules such as H2, CO, or S02 oxidations, HC/D2 exchange, and others, are mostly structure insensitive. Sometimes, the insensitivity is quite surprising, as with di-tm-butylacetylene hydrogenation (226). 

As there are a number of features which are common to all exchange reactions, it is of value to consider these in some detail before discussing the results which have been obtained for the exchange of individual hydrocarbons. Exchange reactions are a unique class of chemical reactions, and attention will be directed to the methods of interpretation of experimental data which are relevant to the study of exchange reactions and to the ways in which these may be classified. 

---