Euclidean distance , data processing

The choice of representation, of similarity measure and of selection method are not independent of each other. For example, some types of similarity measure (specifically the association coefficients as exemplified by the well-known Tanimoto coefficient) seem better suited than others (such as Euclidean distance) to the processing of fingerprint data [12]. Again, the partition-based methods for compound selection that are discussed below can only be used with low-dimensionality representations, thus precluding the use of fingerprint representations (unless some drastic form of dimensionality reduction is performed, as advocated by Agrafiotis [13]). Thus, while this chapter focuses upon selection methods, the reader should keep in mind the representations and the similarity measures that are being used recent, extended reviews of these two important components of diversity analysis are provided by Brown [14] and by Willett et al. [15]. 

Correspondence analysis is more direct in its approach, without imposing assumptions on the process of data manipulation. It deals strictly with the Euclidean distances between groups of -dimensional points without the restrictions of hierarchical classification of the samples. ... 

---