Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Error estimate algebraic models

The only drawback in using this method is that any numerical errors introduced in the estimation of the time derivatives of the state variables have a direct effect on the estimated parameter values. Furthermore, by this approach we can not readily calculate confidence intervals for the unknown parameters. This method is the standard procedure used by the General Algebraic Modeling System (GAMS) for the estimation of parameters in ODE models when all state variables are observed. [Pg.120]

Once we have estimated the unknown parameters that appear in an algebraic or ODE model, it is quite important to perform a few additional calculations to establish estimates of the standard error in the parameters and in the expected response variables. These additional computational steps are very valuable as they provide us with a quantitative measure of the quality of the overall fit and inform us how trustworthy the parameter estimates are. [Pg.177]

Selection of the form of an empirical model requires judgment as well as some skill in recognizing how response patterns match possible algebraic functions. Optimization methods can help in the selection of the model structure as well as in the estimation of the unknown coefficients. If you can specify a quantitative criterion that defines what best represents the data, then the model can be improved by adjusting its form to improve the value of the criterion. The best model presumably exhibits the least error between actual data and the predicted response in some sense. [Pg.48]

A consistent numerical scheme produces a system of algebraic equations which can be shown to be equivalent to the original model equations as the grid spacing tends to zero. The truncation error represents the difference between the discretized equation and the exact one. For low order finite difference methods the error is usually estimated by replacing all the nodal values in the discrete approximation by a Taylor series expansion about a single point. As a result one recovers the original differential equation plus a remainder, which represents the truncation error. [Pg.989]

The majority of quantum-chemistry calculations have been carried out by employing the independent particle model in the framework of the HF method. In the most widely used approach molecular orbitals are expanded in predefined one-particle basis functions which results in recasting the integro-differential HF equations into their algebraic equivalents. In practice, however, the basis set used is never complete and very often far too limited to describe essential features of HF orbitals, for example, their behaviour in the vicinity of nuclei. That is why such calculations always suffer from the so called basis set truncation error . This error is difficult to estimate and often leads to low credibility of the results. [Pg.4]

TABLE 3.17 Structure Activity Relationships for all Possible Correlation Models Considered from the Data in Table 3.16 Together with the Statistical (Simple Correlation Factor, Standard Error of Estimation SEE, Explained Variance EV, Student r-test, Fischer F-test) and Algebraic (Correlation Factor r ° and Norm-Length ) for each Considered Endpoint ... [Pg.319]


See other pages where Error estimate algebraic models is mentioned: [Pg.114]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.503]    [Pg.836]    [Pg.428]    [Pg.754]    [Pg.518]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.1093]    [Pg.1305]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.167 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.167 ]




SEARCH



Algebraic models

Error estimate

Error estimating

Error estimation

Error model

Estimated error

© 2024 chempedia.info