Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Equivalency of mercury porosimetry and gas adsorption

Lowell and Shields have shown that vapor condensation-evaporation and mercury intrusion-extrusion into and out of pores are thermodynamically equivalent processes. [Pg.132]

A vapor will condense into pores of radius r according to the Kelvin equation, namely [Pg.132]

The molar free-energy change associated with the isothermal vapor-pressure change from Pq to P is given by [Pg.132]

The process of mercury intrusion requires the application of hydraulic pressure, P, to force mercury into pores for which the molar free-energy change is given by [Pg.133]

Equating the molar free-energy terms in (12.24) and (12.25) affords an expression which relates the hydraulic pressure P required to force mercury into pores to the relative pressure, PJPq, exerted by the liquid with radius of curvature, r. That is. [Pg.133]


A significant aspect of the equivalency of mercury porosimetry and gas adsorption is the implication that mercury can fill pores by either liquid or vapor transport. [Pg.135]


See other pages where Equivalency of mercury porosimetry and gas adsorption is mentioned: [Pg.132]   


SEARCH



Adsorption equivalent

Adsorption of gases

Adsorption of mercury

Gas adsorption

Mercury adsorption

Mercury and

Mercury porosimetry

Of mercury

Porosimetry

© 2024 chempedia.info