Enzyme kinetics activation energy

The Relationship Between Enzyme Kinetics and Apparent Activation Free Energy... 

B. Studies of Equilibria and Reactions.—N.m.r. spectroscopy is being increasingly employed to study the mode and course of reactions. Thus n.m.r. has been used to unravel the mechanism of the reaction of phosphorus trichloride and ammonium chloride to give phosphazenes, and to follow the kinetics of alcoholysis of phosphoramidites. Its use in the study of the interaction of nucleotides and enzymes has obtained valuable information on binding sites and conformations and work on the line-widths of the P resonance has enabled the calculation of dissociation rate-constants and activation energies to be performed. 

In conclusion, the steady-state kinetics of mannitol phosphorylation catalyzed by II can be explained within the model shown in Fig. 8 which was based upon different types of experiments. Does this mean that the mechanisms of the R. sphaeroides II " and the E. coli II are different Probably not. First of all, kinetically the two models are only different in that the 11 " model is an extreme case of the II model. The reorientation of the binding site upon phosphorylation of the enzyme is infinitely fast and complete in the former model, whereas competition between the rate of reorientation of the site and the rate of substrate binding to the site gives rise to the two pathways in the latter model. The experimental set-up may not have been adequate to detect the second pathway in case of II " . The important differences between the two models are at the level of the molecular mechanisms. In the II " model, the orientation of the binding site is directly linked to the state of phosphorylation of the enzyme, whereas in the II" model, the state of phosphorylation of the enzyme modulates the activation energy of the isomerization of the binding site between the two sides of the membrane. Steady-state kinetics by itself can never exclusively discriminate between these different models at the molecular level since a condition may be proposed where these different models show similar kinetics. The II model is based upon many different types of data discussed in this chapter and the steady-state kinetics is shown to be merely consistent with the model. Therefore, the II model is more likely to be representative for the mechanisms of E-IIs. 

Methods similar to those discussed in this chapter have been applied to determine free energies of activation in enzyme kinetics and quantum effects on proton transport. They hold promise to be coupled with QM/MM and ab initio simulations to compute accurate estimates of nulcear quantum effects on rate constants in TST and proton transport rates through membranes. 

The next step in formulating a kinetic model is to express the stoichiometric and regulatory interactions in quantitative terms. The dynamics of metabolic networks are predominated by the activity of enzymes proteins that have evolved to catalyze specific biochemical transformations. The activity and specificity of all enzymes determine the specific paths in which metabolites are broken down and utilized within a cell or compartment. Note that enzymes do not affect the position of equilibrium between substrates and products, rather they operate by lowering the activation energy that would otherwise prevent the reaction to proceed at a reasonable rate. 

Finally, it is necessary to record reaction kinetics as a function of temperature to determine whether the enzyme system follows the Arrhenius relationship, indicating that activation energies and, presumably, reaction mechanisms remain unchanged in the temperature range investigated. Once these investigations have been completed, low-temperature spectroscopy can be used to dissect the reaction mechanism by trapping normally unstable intermediates. 

Selected entries from Methods in Enzymology [vol, page(s)] Pepsin Activation energy, 63, 243-245 isotope exchange, 64, 10 kinetic constants, 63, 244 kinin-releasing enzyme, 80, 174 porcine, homology to cathepsin D, 80, 578 spectrokinetic probe,... 

Catalysts and enzymes also can vary significantly between batches and exhibit activation and deactivation, so that reaction rates may be expected to vary with time. Thus it is not unusual to find that a reaction activation energy increases with the time that a process has been onstream, which one might need to fit by assuming that E is a function of time. As you might expect problems such as these require careful consideration and caution. We win consider catalytic reactions and their kinetics in Chapter 7. 

Figure 8.1 Model energy diagrams for non-enzymic reactions (A), enzymic reaction following the rapid equilibrium mechanism (see Table 8.1) (B) and enzymic reaction following Briggs-Haldane kinetics (C). E represents the activation energy of transition and the positive and...

Dawes, E. A. Enzyme Kinetics (Optimum pH, Temperature and Activation Energy), in Comp. Biochem. (ed.) Florkin, M., Stotz, E. H., Vol. 12, p. 87, Amsterdam—London-New York, Elsevier Publishing Company 1964... 

Decarboxylase reaction Kinetic constants The optimum pH of the decarboxylase reaction was determined with the natural substrates of both enzymes, pyruvate (PDC) and benzoylformate (BFD). Both enzymes show a pH optimum at pH 6.0-6.5 for the decarboxylation reaction [4, 5] and investigation of the kinetic parameters gave hyperbolic v/[S] plots. The kinetic constants are given in Table 2.2.3.1. The catalytic activity of both enzymes increases with the temperature up to about 60 °C. From these data activation energies of 34 kj moT (PDC) and 38 kJ mol (BFD) were calculated using the Arrhenius equation [4, 6-8]. 

Although the hydrolysis of ATP is highly exeigonic (AG ° = -30.5 kJ/mol), the molecule is kinetically stable at pH 7 because the activation energy for ATP hydrolysis is relatively high. Rapid cleavage of the phosphoanhydride bonds occurs only when catalyzed by an enzyme. 

The fact that enzymes appear to bind their substrates in such a way as to surround and immobilize them means that something other than the kinetic energy of the substrate is needed to provide energy for the ES complex to pass over the transition state barrier. What is the source of this activation energy As with nonenzymatic reactions, it must come ultimately from... 

The rate of inactivation by chelators is strongly dependent on temperature, pH, and protein concentration (13). Between 16° and 30° the activation energy for the chelator-dependent loss of activity is 41 kcal at pH 8.2. At 30° the rate of inactivation is over 200-fold faster at pH 8.7 than at pH 7.2. The inactivation is much faster in dilute than in concentrated enzyme solutions as the protein concentration is increased, correspondingly more rigorous conditions must be employed to observe inactivation. The rate of inactivation appears to exhibit saturation kinetics with respect to chelator concentration. At high EDTA levels the inactivation rate approaches a maximum which is independent of chelator concentration (13). 

---