Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Energy surface deformation

The above models consider only one spatial variable which is the bonding distance. It is clear that, for a molecule anything more complex than diatomic, many parameters are needed to define even approximately the potential energy surface. The enormous advances in computational chemistry during the last few years have allowed quantum mechanical calculations on fairly large size molecules. The first attempt to apply quantum mechanics on deformed polymer chains was made... [Pg.107]

Onuma T. and Ohkawa S. Detection of surface deformation related to with C02 injection by DInSAR at In Salah, Algeria. 2009 Energy Procedia 1 2177-2184. [Pg.177]

In such cases, the MEHMC method could be employed in combination with an enhanced sampling method that deforms the effective energy surface (but preserves the location of the potential minima), such as that in [29, 97]. Likewise, it may be worthwhile to explore the use of a reversible multiple-time-scale molecular dynamics propagator [103] with MEHMC to accelerate the dynamical propagation. [Pg.298]

For a detailed discussion, and an attempt to construct an energy surface for amide deformations of this sort, see Dunitz (1979, pp. 328 ff.). [Pg.109]

Nuclei can be trapped in the secondary minimum of the fission barrier. Such trapped nuclei will experience a significant hindrance of their y-ray decay back to the ground state (because of the large shape change involved) and an enhancement of their decay by spontaneous fission (due to the thinner barrier they would have to penetrate.) Such nuclei are called spontaneously fissioning isomers, and they were first observed in 1962 and are discussed below. They are members of a general class of nuclei, called superdeformed nuclei, that have shapes with axes ratios of 2 1. These nuclei are all trapped in a pocket in the potential energy surface due to a shell effect at this deformation. [Pg.306]

So far a number of important conclusions can be summarised. The SFM signal (deflection of the cantilever) results from a combination of surface and deformation forces. The total surface force between a SFM tip and a polymer surface includes adhesion and capillary forces, Fs=Fadh+Fcap. For polymer surface, it can be estimated to Fs 15 nN. Lower values might be expected for nonwettable and lower energy surfaces. The surface force is balanced by forces from the surface deformation, Fd, and from the deflection of the cantilever, Fc. In order to monitor a signal in contact SFM, the deformation forces must exceed the total surface forces, Fc=Fd - Fs. E.g., a net repulsive force of 0.4 nN will be monitored by 1 nm deflection of a Si cantilever with the following parameters E=50 GPa, 1= 100 pm,b=30 pm, h=4 pm, k=0.4 N/m. [Pg.71]

Also adhesion between the tip and sample can cause deformation of the sample. Several theories have been developed to include the effect of adhesive forces. In the JKR theory adhesion forces outside the contact area are neglected and elastic stresses at the contact line are infinite [80]. Even under zero load, the adhesion force results in a finite contact radius a=(9jtR2y/2 E)1/3 as obtained from Eq. 7 for F=0. For example, for a tip radius R=10 nm, E=lGPa, typical surface energy for polymers y=25 mN/m, and typical SFM load F=1 nN, the contact radius will be about a=9.5 nm and 8=9 nm, while under zero load the contact radius and the deformation become a=4.5 nm and 8=2 nm, respectively. The experiment shows that under zero load the contact radius for a 10 nm tungsten tip and an organic film in air is 2.4 nm [240]. The contact radius caused only by adhesion is almost five times larger than the Hertzian diameter calculated above. It means, that even at very small forces the surface deformation as well as the lateral resolution is determined by adhesion between the tip and sample. [Pg.100]

This fact and the results of several experimental and theoretical studies suggest that the nuclei around A = 100 change their shapes rapidly but that they have complex potential energy surfaces. In particular, these nuclei are supposed to be soft with respect to y deformations. However, recent investigations on odd-mass nuclei revealed properties of classical symmetric rotors. A good example is Y6q, the isotone of 98Sr and 100Zr,... [Pg.206]

Data have been collected in recent years on the effects of He implantation in metals109-11 Gas re-emission measurements have shown that, at low doses, essentially all of the helium is retained in the lattice. At a critical dose, which depends on a number of variables (energy, temperature and material) the surface deforms and... [Pg.80]


See other pages where Energy surface deformation is mentioned: [Pg.163]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.1215]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.823]    [Pg.405]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.681]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.835]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.400]    [Pg.404]    [Pg.405]    [Pg.406]    [Pg.93]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.124 ]




SEARCH



Deformation energy

Deforming surface

Surface deformation

© 2024 chempedia.info