Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Energy levels, particle

Calculate the value of the first three energy levels according to the wave mechanical picture of a particle in a one-dimensional box. Take the case of nitrogen... [Pg.672]

It should be mentioned that the single-particle Flamiltonians in general have an infinite number of solutions, so that an uncountable number of wavefiinctions [/ can be generated from them. Very often, interest is focused on the ground state of many-particle systems. Within the independent-particle approximation, this state can be represented by simply assigning each particle to the lowest-lying energy level. If a calculation is... [Pg.26]

It would appear that identical particle pemuitation groups are not of help in providing distinguishing syimnetry labels on molecular energy levels as are the other groups we have considered. However, they do provide very usefiil restrictions on the way we can build up the complete molecular wavefiinction from basis fiinctions. Molecular wavefiinctions are usually built up from basis fiinctions that are products of electronic and nuclear parts. Each of these parts is fiirther built up from products of separate uncoupled coordinate (or orbital) and spin basis fiinctions. Wlien we combine these separate fiinctions, the final overall product states must confonn to the pemuitation syimnetry mles that we stated above. This leads to restrictions in the way that we can combine the uncoupled basis fiinctions. [Pg.173]

The Boltzmann distribution is fundamental to statistical mechanics. The Boltzmann distribution is derived by maximising the entropy of the system (in accordance with the second law of thermodynamics) subject to the constraints on the system. Let us consider a system containing N particles (atoms or molecules) such that the energy levels of the... [Pg.361]

The Boltzmann distribution gives the number of particles n, in each energy level e, as ... [Pg.361]

Figure 6-1 Energy Levels E and Wave Functions tp for a Particle in a One-Dimensional Box,... Figure 6-1 Energy Levels E and Wave Functions tp for a Particle in a One-Dimensional Box,...
The uncertainty principle, according to which either the position of a confined microscopic particle or its momentum, but not both, can be precisely measured, requires an increase in the carrier energy. In quantum wells having abmpt barriers (square wells) the carrier energy increases in inverse proportion to its effective mass (the mass of a carrier in a semiconductor is not the same as that of the free carrier) and the square of the well width. The confined carriers are allowed only a few discrete energy levels (confined states), each described by a quantum number, as is illustrated in Eigure 5. Stimulated emission is allowed to occur only as transitions between the confined electron and hole states described by the same quantum number. [Pg.129]

Decay Schemes. Eor nuclear cases it is more useful to show energy levels that represent the state of the whole nucleus, rather than energy levels for individual atomic electrons (see Eig. 2). This different approach is necessary because in the atomic case the forces are known precisely, so that the computed wave functions are quite accurate for each particle. Eor the nucleus, the forces are much more complex and it is not reasonable to expect to be able to calculate the wave functions accurately for each particle. Thus, the nuclear decay schemes show the experimental levels rather than calculated ones. This is illustrated in Eigure 4, which gives the decay scheme for Co. Here the lowest level represents the ground state of the whole nucleus and each level above that represents a different excited state of the nucleus. [Pg.449]

The emitted P particles excite the organic molecules which, in returning to normal energy levels, emit light pulses that are detected by a photomultiplier tube, amplified, and electronically counted. Liquid scintillation counting is by far the most widely used technique in tritium tracer studies and has superseded most other analytical techniques for general use (70). [Pg.15]

The most complicated case is of no asymmetry, i.e., e = 0, and it is specially this problem that we shall investigate. At e = 0 the system, described by Hq, has two energy levels E = + 2 do. If the particle is initially put into the left well, the amplitudes of the particle being in the left and right wells oscillate, respectively, as... [Pg.21]

In a solution containing such particles, the conditions for equilibrium in all possible proton transfers must be satisfied simultaneously, In terms of these proton energy levels, we may say that this is made possible by the additivity of the J values. In Fig. 38 the values of J for the three proton transfers have been labeled J1, J2, and J3. From the relation J3 = Ji + Ji) we may obtain at once a relation between the values of Kx, and hence between the equilibrium constants K. In the proton transfer labeled Jt the number of solute particles remains unchanged, whereas in J4 and Jt the number of solute particles is increased by unity. [Pg.136]

Since the energy difference between translational energy levels is very small and the sum is over a large number of particles, we can assume the energy... [Pg.519]

The more sophisticated—and more general—way of finding the energy levels of a particle in a box is to use calculus to solve the Schrodinger equation. First, we note that the potential energy of the particle is zero everywhere inside the box so V(x) = 0, and the equation that we have to solve is... [Pg.142]

What does this equation tell us Because the mass, m, of the particle appears in the denominator, for a given length of box, the energy levels lie at lower values for heavy particles than for light particles. Because the length of the box appears in the denominator (as L2), as the walls become more confining (L smaller), the energy levels are squeezed upward. [Pg.143]

We see that, as L (the length of the box) or m (the mass of the particle) increases, the separation between neighboring energy levels decreases (Fig. 1.26). That is why no one noticed that energy is quantized until they investigated very small systems such as an electron in a hydrogen atom the separation between levels is so small for ordinary particles in ordinary-sized vessels that it is completely undetectable. We can, in fact, ignore the quantization of the motion of the atoms of a gas in a typical flask. [Pg.144]

An electron in an atom is like a particle in a box, in the sense that it is confined within the atom by the pull of the nucleus. We can therefore expect the electron s wavefunctions to obey certain boundary conditions, like the constraints we encountered when fitting a wave between the walls of a container. As we saw for a particle in a box, these constraints result in the quantization of energy and the existence of discrete energy levels. Even at this early stage, we can expect the electron to be confined to certain energies, just as spectroscopy requires. [Pg.145]

Solving the Schrodinger equation for a particle with this potential energy is difficult, but Schrodinger himself achieved it in 1927. He found that the allowed energy levels for an electron in a hydrogen atom are... [Pg.146]


See other pages where Energy levels, particle is mentioned: [Pg.451]    [Pg.3894]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.3894]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.402]    [Pg.1419]    [Pg.1689]    [Pg.2908]    [Pg.771]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.462]    [Pg.419]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.450]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.668]    [Pg.514]    [Pg.143]   


SEARCH



Electron energy levels of adsorbed particles

Energy Levels of Charged Particles in Condensed Phases

Energy levels for particle in a box

Energy levels of particle in a box

Particle energy

Particle in a box energy levels

Particle level

© 2024 chempedia.info