Energy Born-Oppenheimer approximation

Pack R T and Hirschfelder J O 1970 Energy corrections to the Born-Oppenheimer approximation. The best adiabatic approximation J. Chem. Phys. 52 521-34... 

Hagedorn, G. A. Electron energy level crossing in the time-dependent Born-Oppenheimer approximation. Theor. Chim. Acta 67 (1990) 163-190... 

We have derived time-reversible, symplectic, and second-order multiple-time-stepping methods for the finite-dimensional QCMD model. Theoretical results for general symplectic methods imply that the methods conserve energy over exponentially long periods of time up to small fluctuations. Furthermore, in the limit m —> 0, the adiabatic invariants corresponding to the underlying Born-Oppenheimer approximation will be preserved as well. Finally, the phase shift observed for symmetric methods with a single update of the classical momenta p per macro-time-step At should be avoided by... 

Both inoleciilar and qiiantnin mechanics in ethods rely on the Born-Oppenheimer approximation. In qnantiinn mechanics, the Schrddmger equation (1) gives the wave function s and energies of a inolecii le. 

The quaniity, (R). the sum of the electronic energy computed 111 a wave funciion calculation and the nuclear-nuclear coulomb interaciion .(R.R), constitutes a potential energy surface having 15X independent variables (the coordinates R j. The independent variables are the coordinates of the nuclei but having made the Born-Oppenheimer approximation, we can think of them as the coordinates of the atoms in a molecule. 

Vhen calculating the total energy of the system, we should not forget the Coulomb inter-ction between the nuclei this is constant within the Born-Oppenheimer approximation Dr a given spatial arrangement of nuclei. When it is desired to change the nuclear positions,... 

The total energy in an Molecular Orbital calculation is the net result of electronic kinetic energies and the interactions between all electrons and atomic cores in the system. This is the potential energy for nuclear motion in the Born-Oppenheimer approximation (see page 32). 

The first basic approximation of quantum chemistry is the Born-Oppenheimer Approximation (also referred to as the clamped-nuclei approximation). The Born-Oppenheimer Approximation is used to define and calculate potential energy surfaces. It uses the heavier mass of nuclei compared with electrons to separate the... 

The Born-Oppenheimer approximation allows the two parts of the problem to be solved independently, so we can construct an electronic Hamiltonian which neglects the kinetic energy term for the nuclei ... 

The concept of a potential energy surface has appeared in several chapters. Just to remind you, we make use of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation to separate the total (electron plus nuclear) wavefunction into a nuclear wavefunction and an electronic wavefunction. To calculate the electronic wavefunction, we regard the nuclei as being clamped in position. To calculate the nuclear wavefunction, we have to solve the relevant nuclear Schrddinger equation. The nuclei vibrate in the potential generated by the electrons. Don t confuse the nuclear Schrddinger equation (a quantum-mechanical treatment) with molecular mechanics (a classical treatment). 

The Hamiltonian for this system should include the kinetic and potential energy of the electron and both of the nuclei. However, since the electron mass is more than a thousand times smaller than that of the lightest nucleus, one can consider the nuclei to be effectively motionless relative to the quickly moving electron. This assumption, which is basically the Born-Oppenheimer approximation, allows one to write the Schroedinger equation neglecting the nuclear kinetic energy. For the Hj ion the Born-Oppenheimer Hamiltonian is... 

Use of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation is implicit for any many-body problem involving electrons and nuclei as it allows us to separate electronic and nuclear coordinates in many-body wave function. Because of the large difference between electronic and ionic masses, the nuclei can be treated as an adiabatic background for instantaneous motion of electrons. So with this adiabatic approximation the many-body problem is reduced to the solution of the dynamics of the electrons in some frozen-in configuration of the nuclei. However, the total energy calculations are still impossible without making further simplifications and approximations. 

When the Drude particles are treated adiabatically, a SCF method must be used to solve for the displacements of the Drude particle, d, similarly to the dipoles Jtj in the induced dipole model. The implementation of the SCF condition corresponding to the Born-Oppenheimer approximation is straightforward and the real forces acting on the nuclei must be determined after the Drude particles have attained the energy minimum for a particular nuclear configuration. In the case of N polarizable atoms with positions r, the relaxed Drude particle positions r + d5CF are found by solving... 

Central to the modern approach to chemical reactivity as dynamics on a potential energy surface, is the Born-Oppenheimer approximation.9... 

Chemical reactions of molecules at metal surfaces represent a fascinating test of the validity of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation in chemical reactivity. Metals are characterized by a continuum of electronic states with many possible low energy excitations. If metallic electrons are transferred between electronic states as a result of the interactions they make with molecular adsorbates undergoing reaction at the surface, the Born-Oppenheimer approximation is breaking down. 

It should also be mentioned that a theoretical model using an empirical LEPS potential energy surface has successfully been used to reproduce the vibrational population distribution of the products of this surface reaction.40 This approach confines itself to the assumptions of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation and underscores one of the major questions remaining in this field do we just need better Born Oppenheimer potential surfaces or do we need a different theoretical approach ... 

Fig. 3. Vibrational population distributions of N2 formed in associative desorption of N-atoms from ruthenium, (a) Predictions of a classical trajectory based theory adhering to the Born-Oppenheimer approximation, (b) Predictions of a molecular dynamics with electron friction theory taking into account interactions of the reacting molecule with the electron bath, (c) Born—Oppenheimer potential energy surface, (d) Experimentally-observed distribution. The qualitative failure of the electronically adiabatic approach provides some of the best available evidence that chemical reactions at metal surfaces are subject to strong electronically nonadiabatic influences. (See Refs. 44 and 45.)...

Fig. 5.2 Radial distribution curves, Pv

---