Enantioselective reactions continued asymmetric addition

The asymmetric catalytic reduction of ketones (R2C=0) and imines (R2C=NR) with certain organohydrosilanes and transition-metal catalysts is named hydrosilylation and has been recognized as a versatile method providing optically active secondary alcohols and primary or secondary amines (Scheme 1) [1]. In this decade, high enantioselectivity over 90% has been realized by several catalytic systems [2,3]. Therefore the hydrosilylation can achieve a sufficient level to be a preparative method for the asymmetric reduction of double bond substrates. In addition, the manipulative feasibility of the catalytic hydrosilylation has played a major role as a probe reaction of asymmetric catalysis, so that the potential of newly designed chiral ligands and catalysts can be continuously scrutinized. 

In the course of the continuing study [9a,b] on the enantioselective addition of dialkylzincs to aldehydes by using chiral amino alcohols such as diphenyl(l-methyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)methanol (45) (DPMPM) [48] A. A -dibutylnorephedrine 46 (DBNE) [49], and 2-pyrrolidinyl-l-phenyl-1-propanol (47) [50] as chiral catalysts, Soai et al. reacted pyridine-3-carbaldehyde (48) with dialkylzincs using (lS,2/ )-DBNE 46, which gave the corresponding chiral pyridyl alkanols 49 with 74-86% ee (Scheme 9.24) [51]. The reaction with aldehyde 48 proceeded more rapidly (1 h) than that with benzaldehyde (16 h), which indicates that the product (zinc alkoxide of pyridyl alkanol) also catalyzes the reaction to produce itself. This observation led them to search for an asymmetric autocatalysis by using chiral pyridyl alkanol. 

This type of additive (or ligand) control of stereoselectivity has three advantages. First of all, after the reaction has been completed, the chiral additive can be separated from the product with physical methods, for example, chromatographically. In the second place, the chiral additive is therefore also easier to recover than if it had to be first liberated from the product by means of a chemical reaction. The third advantage of additive control of enantioselectivity is that the enantiomerically pure chiral additive does not necessarily have to be used in stoichiometric amounts catalytic amounts may be sufficient. This type of catalytic asymmetric synthesis, especially on an industrial scale, is important and will continue to be so. 

The major advantage of the use of CuHY as a catalyst for this reaction is the ease with which it can be recovered from the reaction mixture by simple filtration if used in. a batch reactor (alternatively it can be used in a continuous flow fixed bed reactor). We have carried out the heterogeneous asymmetric aziridination of styrene until completion, filtered and washed the zeolite then added fresh styrene, PhI=NTs and solvent, without further addition of chiral bis(oxazoline), for several consecutive experiments. The yield and the enantioselectivity decline slightly on reuse we have found that adsorbed water can build up within the pores of the zeolite on continued use and we believe that this is the cause of loss of activity and enantioselection. However, full enantioselectivity and yield can be recovered if the catalyst is simply dried in air prior to reuse, or alternatively the catalyst can be recalcined and fresh oxazoline ligand added. 

Experiments described by Corey constitute a noteworthy example of double asymmetric induction where neither participant in the reaction is chiral [95] As illustrated in Figure 4.18 two different catalysts are necessary to achieve the best results. Control experiments indicated that the nucleophile is probably free cyanide, introduced by hydrolysis of the trimethylsilylcyanide by adventitious water, and continuously regenerated by silylation of the alkoxide product. Note that the 82.5% enantioselectivity in the presence of the magnesium complex shown in Figure 4.18a is improved to 97% upon addition of the bisoxazoline illustrated Figure 4.18b as a cocatalyst. Note also that the bisoxazoline 4.18b alone affords almost no enantioselectivity, and that the enantioselectivity is much less when the enantiomer of the bisoxazoline (Figure 4.18b) when used as the cocatalyst. Thus 4.18a and 4.18b constitute a matched pair of co-catalysts and 4.18a and ent-A. %h are a mismatched pair (see Chapter 1 for definitions). The proposed transition structure... 

New protocols for the catalytic asymmetric monoallylation of aldehydes using the title reagent continue to be developed. For example, it has been shown (eq 10) that a range of aromatic and aliphatic aldehydes engage, in the presence of 5 mol % [(/ )-BlNOL]-Ti [OCH(CF3)2]2, in an enantioselective addition reaction with trimethyl 2-[(tributylstannyl)methyl]-2-propenyl -silane to give the expected addition products in >90% ee and 54—94% chemical yield. ... 

The introduction of the activated allylic bromides and Morita-Baylis-HiUman acetates and carbonates pioneered the development of a number of phosphine-catalyzed reactions in subsequent years [45]. Interestingly, the asymmetric variant of this type of transformation only appeared in the literature seven years later. In 2010, Tang, Zhou, and coworkers disclosed a highly enantioselective intramolecular ylide [3-1-2] annulation using spirobiindane-based phosphine catalyst 31 (Scheme 20.27). BINAP was found inactive in this reaction even at an elevated temperature (70°C). Notably, both optically active benzobicyclo[4.3.0] compounds 32 and 32 with three continuous stereogenic centers could be obtained as major products in high yields and stereoselectivities just by a choice of an additive [Ti(OPr )4], which can block the isomerization of the double bond [46]. 

---