Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Enantioselective comparative performances

Several asymmetric 1,2-additions of various organolithium reagents (methyllithium, n-butyllithium, phenyllithium, lithioacetonitrile, lithium n-propylacetylide, and lithium (g) phenylacetylide) to aldehydes result in decent to excellent ee% (65-98%) when performed in the presence of a chiral lithium amido sulfide [e.g. (14)], 75 The chiral lithium amido sulfides invariably have exhibited higher levels of enantioselectivity compared to the structurally similar chiral lithium amido ethers and the chiral lithium amide without a chelating group. [Pg.289]

Catalytic asymmetric hydrogenations have also been performed in supercritical carbon dioxide [79-81]. For example, a-enamides were hydrogenated in high enantioselectivities comparable to those observed in conventional solvents, using a cationic rhodium complex of the EtDuPHOS ligand (Fig. 7.24) [79]. More recently, catalytic asymmetric hydrogenations have been performed in scC02 with... [Pg.315]

The molecular imprinting method can be used to synthesize enantioselective solid materials for asymmetric organic synthesis. The first attempt to use a metal complex with an attached chiral ligand as a template was attempted by Lemaire [52]. The Rh complex, ((15,25)-V,V -dimethyl-l,2-diphenylethane diamine)-[Rh(CgHj2)Cl]2 coordinated with optically pure l-(5)-phenylethoxide or phenylethoxide (Rh 1-phenylethanolate) (template) was polymerized in the presence of isocyanate, and the polyurea-supported Rh complex is reacted with isopropanol to extract the template from the polymer backbone. They reported the influence of molecular imprinting on catalytic performance (conversion and enantiomeric excess) for the asymmetric transfer hydrogenation (Table 22.2). The imprinted polymer exhibited higher enantioselectivity compared to a nonimprinted... [Pg.479]

Diphosphine-rhodium catalysts bound to inorganic supports via isocyana-to-alkyl-trialkoxysilane linkers meet all requirements to be of practical use i. the preparation method is probably the most simple, general and efficient known so far, ii. immobilized cationic rhodium complexes with "molecular weights" as low as 5 kD exhibit a comparable performance in enantioselective catalytic... [Pg.113]

The Diels-Alder reaction of nonyl acrylate with cyclopentadiene was used to investigate the effect of homochiral surfactant 114 (Figure 4.5) on the enantioselectivity of the reaction [77]. Performing the reaction at room temperature in aqueous medium at pH 3 and in the presence of lithium chloride, a 2.2 1 mixture of endo/exo adducts was obtained with 75% yield. Only 15% of ee was observed, which compares well with the results quoted for Diels-Alder reactions in cyclodextrins [65d]. Only the endo addition was enantioselective and the R enantiomer was prevalent. This is the first reported aqueous chiral micellar catalysis of a Diels-Alder reaction. [Pg.179]

Similar asymmetric hydrosilylation reactions were also performed using Rh-(R,R)-f-Bu-MiniPHOS, and the enantioselectivities obtained (80-97% ee) [29] are comparable with those obtained by use of the most effective ligands [ 125]. [Pg.35]

The hydrosilylation of acetophenone by diphenylsilane in CH2CI2 at rt was used as a test reaction to compare the selectivity obtained with the carbene ligands (Scheme 36). The reactions were performed in the presence of a sUght excess of AgBp4 (1.2% mol). In these conditions, the N-mesityl-substituted catalyst 57c (1% mol) gave the highest selectivity (65% ee). The in situ formation of square-planar cationic rhodium species 58 as active catalysts appears to be crucial since the same reaction performed without silver salt gave both poor yield (53%) and enantioselectivity (13%). [Pg.213]

New organocatalysts prepared by the Jacobsen group showed that alkylation of the final amide bond increased the enantioselection (Scheme 38, compare R2 = Me, 98% ee to R2 = H, 91% ee). Thus, the reaction performed with N-allyl benzaldimine and with the dimethylamide-ending thiourea (Scheme 38 with Ri = R2 = Me) gave up to 99% ee. This compound is a structural analogue of the urea depicted in Scheme 36 [148,152,154]. [Pg.257]

In 2004, ruthenium-catalysed asymmetric cyclopropanations of styrene derivatives with diazoesters were also performed by Masson et al., using chiral 2,6-bis(thiazolines)pyridines. These ligands were prepared from dithioesters and commercially available enantiopure 2-aminoalcohols. When the cyclopropanation of styrene with diazoethylacetate was performed with these ligands in the presence of ruthenium, enantioselectivities of up to 85% ee were obtained (Scheme 6.6). The scope of this methodology was extended to various styrene derivatives and to isopropyl diazomethylphosphonate with good yields and enantioselectivities. The comparative evaluation of enantiocontrol for cyclopropanation of styrene with chiral ruthenium-bis(oxazolines), Ru-Pybox, and chiral ruthenium-bis(thiazolines), Ru-thia-Pybox, have shown many similarities with, in some cases, good enantiomeric excesses. The modification... [Pg.213]

Catalyst performance was far superior to the corresponding BINAP or Me-Du-Phos systems, with both conversions and selectivities being higher. The hydrogenation of enol ethers using Rh-PennPhos catalysts has been reported in a patent by Zhang [67d]. Under mild conditions, high enantioselectivities were obtained (73-94% ee) for 1-aryl-l-methoxy-ethene derivatives 121, compared to Me-DuPhos (40-73% ee) and BINAP (46-48% ee). [Pg.818]

Until now, only a few effective ligands of this type have been identified (Fig. 25.4). Kagan and co-workers [5] prepared one of the few chiral diphosphines with only planar chirality and obtained 95% ee for the hydrogenation of DM IT with LI (Table 25.1, entry 1.1.), but enantioselectivities for several enamide derivatives were below 82% ee (the best results were with the cyclohexyl analogue of LI). For the reactions with DM IT or MAC, the cationic Rh-kephos complex showed comparable or better performance than corresponding duphos catalysts. [Pg.835]


See other pages where Enantioselective comparative performances is mentioned: [Pg.157]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.393]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.850]    [Pg.777]    [Pg.812]    [Pg.814]    [Pg.816]    [Pg.1343]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.187 ]




SEARCH



Comparative performance

© 2024 chempedia.info