Empirical kinetic equations definition

Empirical kinetic equations for dynamic processes such as reaction rates very often form the basis of theoretical developments that show the fine details of the mechanisms of reactions. Perhaps the most classical example of an empirical kinetic equation is Equation 7.8, which was discovered experimentally in 1878. But a satisfactory theoretical justification for Equation 7.8 was provided by Eyring in 1935, which provides the physicochemical meanings of the empirical constants, A and B, of Equation 7.8. Empirical kinetic equations, such as Equation 7.47 to Equation 7.55, obtained as the functions of concentrations of reactants, catalysts, inert salts, and solvents, provide vital information regarding the fine details of reaction mechanisms. The basic approach in using kinetics as a tool for elucidation of the reaetion mechanism consists of (1) experimental determination of empirical kinetic equation, (2) proposal of a plausible reaction mechanism, (3) derivation of the rate law in view of the proposed reaction mechanism (such a derived rate law is referred to as theoretical rate law), and (4) comparison of the derived rate law with experimentally observed rate law, which leads to the so-called theoretical kinetic equation. The theoretical kinetic equation must be similar to the empirical kinetic equation with definite relationships between empirical constants and various rate constants and equilibrium constants used in the proposed reaction mechanism. 

In the 1-substrate case one can at least say that the dissociation constant may not exceed K -, there is therefore a formal mathematical relationship between the two constants. For some mechanisms involving more than one reactant, not even this limited degree of linkage exists. Michaelis constants are empirical kinetic parameters. They have an entirely adequate definition in kinetic terms and should not be equated with thermodynamic constants without sound theoretical or experimental justification. 

Case study C modified reaction model. As mentioned above, three additional experiments at 30°C were carried out using less hydroperoxide. They were considered together with the three standard measurements at 30°C. Thus, the dependence of the reaction kinetics on the hydroperoxide concentration could be analysed, and the definitions of the reaction rates r and r2 in Equations 8.24 were replaced by those for a modified empirical reaction model shown in Equations 8.25 ... 

Equations. State the nature or origin of each equation that you use (definition, balance, kinetic expression, or empirical correlation) to take the mystery out of your development. For example, The rate of heat transfer in a heat exchanger is frequently reported as follows ... 

To facilitate the discussion below, we need, once again, to define the terminology first. By our definition, the isotherm-based reactive transport models are not coupled models because only one set of equations, namely partial differential equations for transport, is solved. The chemical processes are simulated according to empirical parameters rather than according to thermodynamics and chemical kinetics. 

In a later article [74], Ferraris et al. again used the data by Nielsen et al. to test 23 different rate equations for ammonia synthesis. Some of the rate equations considered both associative and dissociative mechanisms. Others were purely empirical. They concluded that a large number of the models represented the data equally well, in fact better than the Temkin-Pyzhev equation. This again proves that it is extremely difficult, and in fact usually impossible, to draw definite conclusions about the mechanism from kinetic data alone. 

---