Ellipsometry generalized

As discussed above, the reflection of linearly polarized light from a surface generally produces elliptically polarized light, because the parallel and perpendicular components are reflected with different efficiencies and different phase shifts. These changes in intensity and phase angle can be analyzed to characterize the reflecting system. This approach is called ellipsometry. 

Spectroscopic Ellipsometry Porosimetry (EP). In general, ellip-sometry takes advantage of the change of polarization of a polarized light beam after reflection from a surface. From the parameters (T and A), obtained... 

ELLIPSOMETRY The structure of liquid surfaces with monomolecular films can be studied by measuring the light reflected from the surface. The range of thickness that one generally considers to be measured varies from 100 to 1000 A (10-100 nm). However, in monolayers in which the molecules are oriented and the thickness involved is 5-50 A, the methods have been not easily pursued. In a differential method in which two beams of light from the same incandescent lamp were directed... 

A number of special optical techniques such as the study of second harmonic generation by irradiation of non-centrosymmetric systems by high intensity laser light will be discussed in relation to particular materials and problems. However, one optical technique having a general applicability, namely ellipsometry, must be discussed here. It is one of the best techniques available to determine the thickness of a thin organic film. Such determinations are important as they allow one to have an independent check on the number of layers deposited, given that the thickness of one layer has been determined by X-ray diffraction. 

The main experimental technique applied in this chapter is SE. Several textbooks were written on SE [73,114-118], Therefore, only some basic concepts are described. SE examines the relative phase change of a polarized light beam upon reflection (or transmission) at a sample surface. In Fig. 3.4 the setup of an ellipsometry experiment is shown. Upon model analysis of the experimental data, the DFs and thicknesses of the sample constituents can be extracted. Two different experimental approaches have to be distinguished, standard and generalized ellipsometry. 

Ellipsometry and nonlinear optics have proven their sensitivity in studying monolayer thickness and molecular orientation, but generally the anisotropic nature of the interface makes results rather difficult to interpret [20-22], In many cases, these methods were limited in their potential to supply information about biophysical issues such as head group structure, enzyme secondary structure, and the orientation of ordered regions. 

Our approach to this problem involves a detailed mechanistic study of model systems, in order to identify the (electro)chemical parameters and the physicochemical processes of importance. This approach takes advantage of one of the major developments in electrochemical science over the last two decades, namely the simultaneous application of /ton-electrochemical techniques to study interfaces maintained under electrochemical control [3-5]. In general terms, spectroscopic methods have provided insight into the detailed structure at a variety of levels, from atomic to morphological, of surface-bound films. Other in situ methods, such as ellipsometry [6], neutron reflectivity [7] and the electrochemical quartz crystal microbalance (EQCM) [8-10], have provided insight into the overall penetration of mobile species (ions, solvent and other small molecules) into polymer films, along with spatial distributions of these mobile species and of the polymer itself. Of these techniques, the one upon which we rely directly here is the EQCM, whose operation and capability we now briefly review. 

Disappointingly, this promising work was not followed up, which casts doubt on both the efficacy and general utility of the imprinting technique utilised herein, as well as the applicability of ellipsometry for measuring the extent of binding. 

One criterion for the quality of SAMs is the respective layer thickness, which, for example, can be determined by ellipsometry. As becomes elear in Table 7.1, the thicknesses of the monolayers deposited from ethanol are generally more consistent with the expected values. Most of the thiols used in this study are new, so the tilt angles eould only be estimated based on experiences with other araliphatie systems [36]. Even if the estimated tilt angle for the molecules were to be lower, the ealculated layer thieknesses would still be too low for the values determined for the THF-derived layers. The reason for this behaviour might be the formation of physisorbates. These layers were nevertheless used for the deposition study. 

---